Abstract:On the premise that the expropriation of corporate assets by controlling shareholders would generate a residual loss, we studied how the laws of investor protection influenced on the decentralization of corporate ownership and what role the litigation cost play in this story by continuous time finance model. There are several interested conclusions we reached. At first, the decentralization of ownership is the result of the effective legal protection of minority shareholders’ rights and interest, and this result is irrelevant to whether there is a litigation cost or who pays for this cost. Second, effective investor protection leads to lower private benefits of control. Third, our results demonstrated that an efficient investor protection system would evolve through a self-reinforcing pathway. This means that if the law can effectively protect the minority shareholders, then this protection will become increasingly strong. In contrast, if the investor protection system is ineffective, then this protection system will be practically dead in the end. Fourth, the conclusions about the judicial procedure of how to share the litigation cost means that if penalty remain unchanged, an effective investor protection would lead to the increase of litigation costs over time, while an ineffective investor protection would lead to a decrease over time. This result is independent of who will pay the cost. Finally, our results showed that if the minority shareholders within the legal timeliness of the investor protection law pay the litigation cost, an increase in the penalty rate would lead to an increase in litigation costs. The opposite result we obtain if the controlling shareholders pay the litigation cost; this will lead to a negative correlation between the penalty rate and litigation costs.

Shareholder Litigation Rights and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Derivative Lawsuits

The Dark Side of Shareholder Litigation: Evidence from Corporate Takeovers

National Culture and Governance on Bondholder Wealth: Evidence from Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances Around the World

Shareholder Litigation and Bank Risk

Green innovation and shareholder litigation rights

Why Are Corporate Investment Horizons Shrinking? Uncovering the Spillover Effects of Shareholder Litigation

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

Stakeholder Orientation and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Shareholder litigation risk, managerial risk aversion, redeployable assets, and sustainability: A quasi-natural experiment

Creditor Protection, Ease of Repossession, and the Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from Quasi-natural Experiments

Investor Protection and Ownership Decentralization

Stakeholder Orientation and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from State-Level Adoption of Constituency Statutes

Insider Stock Pledges and Shareholder Wealth

Does shareholder litigation risk promote or hinder corporate social responsibility? A quasi‐natural experiment

Investor Protection and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Dividend Commitment in Firm Bylaws

Do Banks Price Litigation Risk in Debt Contracting? Evidence from Class Action Lawsuits

The effect of shareholder litigation rights on female board representation: A quasi-natural experiment

Disproportional Control Rights and the Governance Role of Debt

Corporate Ownership, Debt, and Expropriation: Evidence from China

The Effect of Shareholder Litigation Risk on the Information Environment: The Case of Cross-Listed Firms

Institutional Investor Attention, Agency Conflicts, and the Cost of Debt