Abstract:Compared with financial information, whether corporate social responsibility disclosure has impacts on debt financing cost has obviously become a heated topic in the academic. This paper selects A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets of China from 2013 to 2017 as sample to study the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost, including bond financing cost and bank loan cost. In addition, this paper divides the sample into voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure group and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure group and studies whether the effects of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost and bank loan cost are different. The empirical results are presented as follows: Firstly, enterprise disclosing high-quality corporate social responsibility report is more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost. Specifically, corporate social responsibility disclosure significantly lowers both the bond financing cost and bank loan cost. Moreover, the reduction impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost is greater than that of bank loan cost. Secondly, enterprises voluntarily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than that of enterprises mandatorily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports. Thirdly, non-state-owned enterprises are more conducive to reducing debt financing cost than that of state-owned enterprise. The enterprises with more market competition are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than the oligopolistic enterprises. Finally, this paper concludes and gives policy implications. This paper amplifies the literature regarding the economic consequences of corporate social responsibility disclosure and improves the understanding of the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost.

Stakeholder Orientation and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from State-Level Adoption of Constituency Statutes

Stakeholder Orientation and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Corporate Hedging and the Cost of Debt

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

Ownership Structure and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Bond Market

Shareholder Litigation Rights and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Derivative Lawsuits

Can't Debt Come into Play Governance Effect Really?The New Evidence Based on the Listed Real Estate Companies in China

The Impact of Mandatory CSR Disclosure on the Cost of Debt Financing: Evidence from China

Investor Protection and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Dividend Commitment in Firm Bylaws

Institutional Investor Attention, Agency Conflicts, and the Cost of Debt

Corporate social responsibility and debt financing cost: evidence from China

Do Constituency Statutes Really Benefit Customers?

Corporate Political Transparency and the Cost of Debt

Social capital and cost of debt: Evidence from Chinese CEO network centrality

The effect of shareholder-debtholder conflicts on corporate tax aggressiveness: Evidence from dual holders

Tax avoidance and cost of debt: evidence from a natural experiment in China

The effect of corporate governance on debt financing cost of listed companies

Governance structure and cost of debt

Share‐pledging and the cost of debt