Comment on "First-Order Superconducting Phase Transition in CeCoIn5"

N.A. Fortune,H.A. Radovan,S.T. Hannahs,T.P. Murphy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0305390
2003-05-16
Superconductivity
Abstract:The Clogston estimate for the Pauli limit used in the original comment (and the paper to which it referred) neglects important effects that lead to a significant enhancement of the Pauli limit in CeCoIn5. The discussion in the original comment is therefore moot and the comment has been withdrawn.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?