Abstract:Solar energy is abundantly present in most parts of the world where there are human activities. The vast abundance and inexhaustibility of solar energy, when coupled with low carbon footprint of its utilization in comparison to fossil fuels, makes solar energy a very compelling energy source in solving our grand challenges especially in the contemporary context of global warming. Studies have projected life-cycle emissions from solar power to be 4–12 gCO2eq/kWh, which is in a sharp contrast to 400–1000 gCO2eq/kWh of fossil fuels. Recent rise of solar thermal energy conversion and utilization is fueled by the re-emergency and also by our recognition of the importance of many low-grade heat driven processes and is exemplified by an almost exponential growth of research efforts on the photothermal material-assisted solar thermal based water evaporation and distillation in the past 8 years. Satisfactory photothermal materials, when combined with proper structural design, are able to effectively capture light and efficiently convert light energy to heat. Various photothermal materials with strong absorbance in the entire solar spectrum (250–2500 nm) have been intensively investigated in the past, including carbon-based materials, metals, metal oxides, and polymers. The absorbed light induces an electric field inside the crystals of the photothermal materials, which in turn drives mobile carries to generate heat. In comparison to light absorption, the light-to-heat conversion performance of most photothermal materials receives much less attention, not due to the lack of efforts but to the fact that most photothermal materials possess very high light-to-heat efficiency. As a matter of fact, the past research efforts have pushed the solar photothermal conversion efficiency close to the theoretical limit in many reported works. The generated solar heat has been utilized to many kinds of exciting applications, such as clean water production by advanced solar distillation, solar electricity generation, atmospheric water harvesting (AWH), and so forth. For instance, for both solar distillation and solar powered AWH processes, they need not any moving parts, electronic devices, and high-pressure operations, which make them low-cost and attractive especially for decentralized freshwater production from unconventional water sources for point-of-consumption (POC). Thanks to the development in photothermal materials/structures and advanced heat loss management strategies, the energy efficiency of solar evaporation and distillation has been drastically improved, leading to some unprecedented clean water production rates being reported in small-scale solar distillation devices. However, like all other renewable energy (e.g., hydropower, wind, geothermal energy, bioenergy), solar energy has its own inherent shortcoming: limited and fluctuated power. It is therefore understandable that the complaint against solar energy is often for its low areal energy intensity in addition to its intermittency, which necessitates the use of large land areas in any form of its utilization. While solar irradiance of 1000 W/m2 is used as a typical standard the real solar irradiance is typically below this value, varying significantly within daily cycle and affected considerably by local weather conditions. Therefore, there are always well-justified reasons to further improve the energy efficiency of any solar energy utilization process. From solar thermal energy conversion and utilization perspective, heat management and waste energy recycling are currently among the most pursued strategies. On the other hand, the applications of many solar thermal conversion processes are still at an infant stage and there are significant barriers standing between the status quo and large scale and practical applications, which call for efforts to investigate the practical issues, such as material cost and stability and longevity of the operation. Last but not the least, identifying new and niche applications for the painstakingly generated solar heat that maximizes its value and that outperforms its conventional counterparts is a new research horizon. With this general background, we are pleased to present to you this special issue on Solar Thermal Energy Conversion and Utilization, which assembles 8 research articles and 4 reviews. These papers cover topics from the effective and/or low-cost photothermal functional materials/structures (Alketbi, S. et al.; Wang, Y. et al.; Guo, S. et al.; Hu, Y. et al.; Singh and Guo) to advanced and forward looking applications: autonomous solar ocean farm (Guo, S. et al.), freshwater production from soil moisture (Zhang, M. et al.), volatile organic compound (VOC) removal during solar distillation (M, J. et al.), photothermal hydrogen production (Zhang, T. et al.), solar-driven soil decontamination (Wu, P. et al.), stable solar evaporation of brine (Kunjaram, U. et al.), brine treatment with controlled salt excretion (Xia, Y. et al.), and solar receivers for concentrated solar power generation (Nie, F. et al.). It is our sincere hope that this special issue can be of help to our readers for them to gasp the latest developments in the field and it would inspire more passions in them to devote themselves to this important endeavor. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Peng Wang is a faculty member at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) in Saudi Arabia. His research interest is in advanced technologies for sustainable water-energy-food nexus. He has published three academic books and more than 110 peer-reviewed papers in prestigious journals, including Nature Sustainability, Nature Communications, Joule, Energy and Environmental Science, ES&T, JACS, Angew Chemie, and so forth. Dr. Wang obtained his bachelor in Environmental Science at Nanjing University, received his MS from Sun-Yat Sen University, and PhD from University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). He joined KAUST in 2009 as a founding faculty member and was the program chair of Environmental Science and Engineering at KAUST from 2013 to 2017. He currently serves as a member of Advisory Committee to Water Supply of Hong Kong. Dr. Wang is the Fellow of Royal Society of Chemistry (FRSC). He received “Distinguished Alumni Award” from Zijin Quanxing Environmental Foundation of Nanjing University in 2021. He was the recipient of the 9th Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz International Prize for Water (PSIPW) in the category of alternative water resources (2020). He received the Nanova Frontier Research Award from the Chinese-American Professors in Environmental Engineering and Science (CAPEES) in 2020. He serves as an Executive Editor and Associate Editor of Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T). Jia Zhu is a Professor at College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nanjing University. His scientific research interest is in the area of nanophotonics and nanoscale heat transfer. Dr. Zhu obtained his bachelor in Physics at Nanjing University, received his MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow at University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. He has received several prestigious awards including: Explorer Prize (2020), NSFC Young Investigator Award (2019), Tan Kah Kee Young Scientist Award (2018), OSA Young Investigator Award (2017), Dupont Young Professor Award (2016), MIT Tech Review TR35 award (2016). He has published over 100 papers in prestigious journals (Nature, Nature series, National Science Review, Science Advances, Joule, PNAS, etc.). He has delivered over 50 keynote/invited talks at leading research institutions and international conferences. He is a fellow of Optical (OSA), Royal Society of Chemistry, and serves as a managing editor of Nanophotonics, editorial board members of Advanced Photonics and Nano Research.

Abstract:International Journal of Energy ResearchVolume 39, Issue 13 p. 1722-1741 Special Issue on Global Warming and Energetic Solutions A review on heat transfer and energy conversion in the enhanced geothermal systems with water/CO2 as working fluid Ruina Xu, Ruina Xu Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLe Zhang, Le Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFuzhen Zhang, Fuzhen Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPeixue Jiang, Corresponding Author Peixue Jiang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 China Correspondence: Peixue Jiang, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Ruina Xu, Ruina Xu Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLe Zhang, Le Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFuzhen Zhang, Fuzhen Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPeixue Jiang, Corresponding Author Peixue Jiang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 China Correspondence: Peixue Jiang, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 14 July 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3352Citations: 40Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Summary Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) technology is regarded as the future of geothermal energy and could become a major energy source in the future. However, EGS technology is not well developed. The challenges of EGS technology development, such as the small heat-recovery factors and water limitations, need to be addressed. A comprehensive understanding of heat transfer in the complex subsurface structures is crucial for energy management in the reservoir, and an accurate heat transfer model of the reservoir is a key tool to optimize heat extraction to improve the heat-recovery factor. The use of CO2 as the EGS working fluid is regarded as an emerging technology to address water limitations. The analytical solutions, lab-scale experiments, field-scale modeling methods of water/CO2 fluid flow and heat transfer in the reservoir, and a thermodynamic analysis of the energy conversion system at the surface are reviewed in this paper. Based on the existing literature, future research should focus on improving our knowledge and optimizing the heat transfer performance in the reservoir. Moreover, the emerging design of a heat exchange network in the reservoir and CO2-EGS could result from technology development. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. References 1Tester JW, Anderson BJ, Batchelor AS, Blackwell DD, DiPippo R, Drake EM, Garnish J, Livesay B, Moore MC, Nichols K, Petty S, Toksoz MN, Veatch RWJr. The future of geothermal energy: impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, DOE Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 Final Report 2006. 2Goldstein B, Hiriart G, Bertani R, Bromley C, Gutiérrez-Negrín L, Huenges E, Muraoka H, Ragnarsson A, Tester J, Zui V. Geothermal energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation 2011. [ O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, K Seyboth, P Matschoss, S Kadner, T Zwickel, P Eickemeier, G Hansen, S Schlömer, C Stechow. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.] 3 Geothermal Energy Association, 2014 annual U.S. & global geothermal power production report, Washington, D.C. 2014. 4Duchane D, Brown D. Hot dry rock (HDR) geothermal energy research and development at Fenton Hill, New Mexico. In Geo-heat Centre Quarterly Bulletin, Vol. 23. Oregon Institute of Technology: Klamath Falls, Oregon, 2009; 13–19. 5Breede K, Dzebisashvili K, Liu XL, Falcone G. A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future. Geothermal Energy 2013; 1: 4. 6Horne RN, Tester JW. Geothermal energy: a scalable option for heat and power. In The Bridge (National Academy of Engineering: Washington, DC, submitted). 7Jeanloz R, Stone HA. JASON review of enhanced geothermal systems. PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-ninth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University: Stanford, California, February 24-26, 2014. 8Zhao XG, Wan G. Current situation and prospect of China's geothermal resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014; 32: 651–661. 9Wang GL. Assessment of geothermal resources in China. In: Proceedings of the 38th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University: Stanford, California, 11–13 February 2013. 10Wang GL. Strategic research on exploration and evaluation of geothermal resources. Geothermal Energy 2010; 6: 15–20. 11Wang J, Shengbiao H, Pang Z, et al. Estimate of geothermal resources potential for hot dry rock in the continental area of china. Science & Technology Review 2012; 30: 25–31. 12Li KW, Wang L, Mao XP, et al. Evaluation and efficient development of geothermal resource associated with oilfield. Science & Technology Review 2012; 30: 32–41. 13Pang ZH, Hu SB, Wang JY. A roadmap to geothermal energy development in China. Science & Technology Review 2012; 30: 18–24. 14Duan ZF, Pang ZH, Wang XY. Sustainability evaluation of limestone geothermal reservoirs with extended production histories in Beijing and Tianjin, China. Geothermics 2011; 40: 125–135. 15Beckers KF, Lukawski MZ, Anderson BJ, Moore MC, Tester JW. Levelized costs of electricity and direct-use heat from enhanced geothermal systems. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 2014; 6: 013141. 16Hofmann H, Weides S, Babadagli T, Zimmermann G, Moeck I, Majorowicz J, Unsworth M. Potential for enhanced geothermal systems in Alberta, Canada. Energy 2014; 69: 578–591. 17Hofmann H, Babadagli T, Zimmermann G. Hot water generation for oil sands processing from enhanced geothermal systems: process simulation for different hydraulic fracturing scenarios. Applied Energy 2014; 113: 524–547. 18Lacirignola M, Blanc I. Environmental analysis of practical design options for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) through life-cycle assessment. Renewable Energy 2013; 50: 901–914. 19Frick S, Kaltschmitt M, Schroeder G. Life cycle assessment of geothermal binary power plants using enhanced low-temperature reservoirs. Energy 2010; 35: 2281–94. 20Mines G, Nathwani J. Estimated power generation costs for EGS. In: Proceedings, Thirty-Eighth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University: Stanford, California, 11 February–13 February, 2013, SGP-TR-198. 21Harto C, Schroeder J, Martino L, Horner R, Clark C. Geothermal energy: the energy-water nexus. In: Proceedings of 38th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, SGP-TR-198, Stanford, CA, 2013. 22DeMeo EA, Galdo JF. Renewal Energy Technology Characterizations, Topical Report, TR-109496. Office of Utility Technologies, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, D.C, 1997. 23Brown DW. A hot day rock geothermal energy concept utilizing supercritical CO2 instead of water. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University 2000; 233–238. 24Pruess K. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) using CO2 as working fluid – a novel approach for generating renewable energy with simultaneous sequestration of carbon. Geothermics 2006; 35: 351–367. 25 B Metz, OR Davidson, PR Bosch, R Dave, LA Meyer (eds). Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), climate change 2007: migration of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. 26Mohan AR, Turaga U, Shembekar V, Elsworth D, Pisupati SV. Utilization of carbon dioxide from coal-based power plants as a heat transfer fluid for electricity generation in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Energy 2013; 57: 505–512. 27Zhang FZ, Jiang PX, Lin YS, Zhang YW. Efficiencies of subcritical and transcritical CO2 inverse cycles with and without an internal heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering 2011; 31: 432–438. 28Zhang XR, Yamaguchi H, Cao YH. Hydrogen production from solar energy powered supercritical cycle using carbon dioxide CO2 heat pumps: fundamental and applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010; 35: 4925–4932. 29Randolph JB, Saar MO. Combining geo-thermal energy capture with geologic carbon dioxide sequestration. Geophysical Research Letters 2011; 38: L10401. 30Pruess K. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): comparing water and CO2 as heat transmission fluids. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, Auckland, New Zealand, November 19-21, 2007. 31Pruess K. On production behavior of enhanced geothermal systems with CO2 as working fluid. Energy Conversion and Management 2008; 49: 1446–1454. 32Gallup DL. Production engineering in geothermal technology: a review. Geothermics 2009; 38: 326–334. 33Finsterle S, Zhang YQ, Pan LH, Dobson P, Oglesby K. Microhole arrays for improved heat mining from enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 2013; 47: 104–115. 34Sausse J, Genter A. Types of permeable fractures in granite. Petrophysical properties of crystalline rocks. Geological Society, London. Special Publications 2005; 240: 1–14. 35Berman AS. Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. Journal of Applied Physics 1953; 24: 1232–1235. 36Beavers GS, Joseph DD. Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1967; 30: 197–207. 37Beavers GS, Sparrow EM, Magnuson RA. Experiments on coupled parallel flows in a channel and bounding porous medium. Transactions of the ASME—Journal of Basic Engineering 1970; 92: 843–848. 38Gustafson CW. Leakage losses from a hydraulic fracture and fracture propagation. Physics of Fluids 1988; 31: 3180–3187. 39Mohais R, Xu CS, Dowd P. Fluid flow and heat transfer within a single horizontal fracture in an enhanced geothermal system. Journal of Heat Transfer 2011; 13:112603-1-8. 40Mohais R, Xu C, Dowd PA, Hand M. Permeability correction factor for fractures with permeable walls. Geophysical Research Letters 2012; 39: L03403. 41Bodvarsson GS, Tsang CF. Injection and thermal breakthrough in fractured geothermal reservoirs. Journal of Geophysical Research 1987; B2: 1031–1048. 42Cheng AHD, Ghassemi A, Detournay E. Integral equation solution of heat extraction from a fracture in hot dry rock. International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2001; 25: 1327–1338. 43Jung Y, Pruess K. A closed-form analytical solution for thermal single-well injection-withdrawal tests. Water Resources Research 2012; 47: W03504. 44Zhao J. Experimental studies of the hydro-thermo-mechanical behavior of joints in granite. PhD thesis, Imperial College, London, 1987. 45Zhao ZH. On the heat transfer coefficient between rock fracture walls and flowing fluid. Computers and Geotechnics 2014; 59: 105–111. 46Zhao J. Geothermal testing and measurements of rock and rock fractures. Geothermics 1994; 23: 215–31. 47 J Zhao. Analytical and experimental studies of heat convection by water flow in rock fractures. In: JR Tillerson, WR Wawersik, (eds.). Proceedings of 33rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Rotterdam: Balkema 1992; 591–6. 48Zhao J, Tso CP. Heat transfer by water flow in rock fractures and the application to hot dry rock geothermal systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstracts 1993; 30: 631–41. 49Ogino F, Mukai K, Kamata M. Heat transfer from the hot dry rock to water flowing through crack. Heat Transfer Japanese Research 1994; 23: 658–673. [Translated from Journal of the Geothermal Research Society of Japan, 1994; 15: 23–29.] 50Ogino F, Yamamura M. Pressure drop of water flow between injection and production wells intersected by a circular fracture. Geothermics 1998; 27: 25–41. 51Ogino F, Yamamura M, Fukuda T. Heat transfer from hot dry rock to water flowing through a circular fracture. Geothermics 1999; 28: 21–24. 52Bataille A, Genthon P, Rabinowicz M, Fritz B. Modeling the coupling between free and forced convection in a vertical permeable slot: implications for the heat production of an enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 2006; 35: 654–82. 53Lu W, Xiang YY. Experiments and sensitivity analyses for heat transfer in a meter-scale regularly fractured granite model with water flow. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering) 2012; 13: 958–968. 54Zhang DX, Kang QJ. Pore scale simulation of solute transport in fractured porous media. Geophysical Research Letters 2004; 31: L12504. 55Mora P, Wang YC, Alonso-Marroquin F. Particle-based simulation of hydraulic fracture and fluid/heat flow in geothermal reservoirs. AIP Conference Proceedings 2013; 1542: 177–180. 56Hayashi K, Willis-Richards J, Hopkirk RJ, Niibori Y. Numerical models of HDR geothermal reservoirs e a review of current thinking and progress. Geothermics 1999; 28: 507–18. 57Jiang PX, Ren ZP. Numerical investigation of forced convection heat transfer in porous media using a thermal non-equilibrium model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 2001; 22: 102–110. 58Jiang PX, Ren ZP, Wang BX. Numerical simulation of forced convection heat transfer in porous plate channels using thermal equilibrium or non-thermal equilibrium models. Numerical Heat Transfer Part A 1999; 35: 99–113. 59Ouyang XL, Jiang PX, Xu RN. Thermal boundary conditions of local thermal non-equilibrium model for convection heat transfer in porous media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2013; 60: 31–40. 60Blocher MG, Zimmermann G, Moeck I, Brandt W, Hassanzadegan A, Magri F. 3D numerical modeling of hydrothermal processes during the lifetime of a deep geothermal reservoir. Geofluids 2010; 10: 406–21. 61Zeng YC, Wu NY, Su Z, Wang XX, Hu J. Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through a novel single vertical fracture at Desert Peak geothermal field. Energy 2013; 63: 268–282. 62Zeng YC, Wu NY, Su Z, Hu J. Numerical simulation of electricity generation potential from fractured granite reservoir through a single horizontal well at Yangbajing geothermal field. Energy 2014; 65: 472–487. 63Zeng YC, Su Z, Wu NY. Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through two horizontal wells at Desert Peak geothermal field. Energy 2013; 56: 92–107. 64Huang XX, Zhu JL, Niu CK, Li J, Hu X, Jin XP. Heat extraction and power production forecast of a prospective enhanced geothermal system site in Songliao Basin, China. Energy 2014; 75: 360–370. 65Zhang YJ, Li ZW, Guo LL, Gao P, Jin XP, Xu TF. Electricity generation from enhanced geothermal systems by oilfield produced water circulating through reservoir stimulated by staged fracturing technology for horizontal wells: a case study in Xujiaweizi area in Daqing Oilfield, China. Energy 2014; 78: 788–805. 66Shaik AR, Rahman SS, Tran NH, Tran T. Numerical simulation of fluid-rock coupling heat transfer in naturally fractured geothermal system. Applied Thermal Engineering 2011; 31: 1600–1606. 67Jiang FM, Luo L, Chen JL. A novel three-dimensional transient model for subsurface heat exchange in enhanced geothermal systems. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 2013; 41: 57–62. 68Chen JL, Luo L, Jiang FM. Analyzing heat extraction and sustainability of EGS with a novel model. Journal of Earth Science and Engineering 2013; 3: 690–700. 69Zhang L, Luo F, Xu RN, Jiang PX, Liu HH. Heat transfer and fluid transport of supercritical CO2 in enhanced geothermal systems with local thermal non-equilibrium model. 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Texas, USA, 5–9 October 2014. 70Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N. A thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled model in local thermal non-equilibrium for fractured HDR reservoir with double porosity. Journal of Geophysical Research 2012; 117: B07205. 71Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N. Thermal recovery from a fractured medium in local thermal non-equilibrium. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2013; 37: 2471–2501. 72Achenbach E. Heat and flow characteristics of packed beds. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 1995; 10: 17–27. 73Wakao N. Particle-to-fluid transfer coefficients and fluid diffusivities at low flow rate in packed beds. Chemical Engineering Science 1976; 31: 1115–1122. 74Dixon AG, Cresswell DL. Theoretical prediction of effective heat-transfer parameters in packed-beds. AIChE Journal 1979; 25: 663–676. 75Kar KK, Dybbs A. Internal heat transfer coefficients of porous metals. Heat Transfer in Porous Media. ASME. New York 1982; 81–91. 76Xu RN, Huang YL, Jiang PX, Wang BX. Internal heat transfer coefficients in microporous media with rarefaction effects. Science China Technological Sciences 2012; 55: 2869–2876. 77Ouyang XL, Xu RN, Jiang PX. Three-equation Local Thermal Non-equilibrium Model for Transient Heat Transfer in Porous Media: A New Approach, Submitted to International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2015. 78Perera MSA, Ranjith PG. Carbon dioxide sequestration effects on coal's hydro-mechanical properties: a review. International Journal of Energy Research 2012; 36: 1015–1031. 79Pruess K, Oldenburg CM, Moridis GM. 1999. E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory report LBNL-43134.,TOUGH2 User's GuideVersion 2. 80Hu LH, Winterfeld PH, Fakcharoenphol P, Wu YS. A novel fully-coupled flow and geomechanics model in enhanced Geothermal reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2013; 107: 1–11. 81Xu TF, Pruess K, Brimhall G. An improved equilibrium-kinetics speciation algorithm for redox reactions in variably saturated subsurface flow systems. Computers & Geosciences 1999; 25: 655–666. 82Xu TF, Pruess K. Modeling multiphase non-isothermal fluid flow and reactive geochemical transport in variably saturated fractured rocks: 1 Methodology. American Journal of Science 2001; 301: 16–33. 83Xu TF, Sonnenthal EL, Spycher N, Pruess K. TOURGHREACT: a simulation program for non-isothermal multiphase reactive geochemical transport in variably saturated geologic media. Computers & Geosciences 2006; 32: 145–165. 84Xu TF. Incorporation of aqueous reaction kinetics and biodegradation into TOUGHREACT: application of a multi-region model to hydrobiogeochemical transport of denitrification and sulfate reduction. Vadose Zone Journal 2008; 7: 305–315. 85Xu TF. TOUGHREACT version 2.0: a simulator for subsurface reactive transport under non-isothermal multiphase flow conditions. Computers & Geosciences 2011; 37: 763–774. 86Xu TF, Ontoy Y, Molling P, Spycher N, Parini M, Pruess K. Reactive transport modeling of injection well scaling and acidizing at Tiwi field, Philippines. Geothermics 2004; 33: 477–491. 87Taron J, Elsworth D, Min KB. Numerical simulation of thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in deformable, fractured porous media. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2009; 9: 167–177. 88Taron J, Elsworth D. Thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in the evolution of engineered geothermal reservoirs. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2009; 46: 855–864. 89Ghassemi A, Zhou X. A three-dimensional thermo-poroelastic model for fracture response to injection/extraction in enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 2011; 40: 39–49. 90Edwards LM. Handbook of Geothermal Energy. Houston Gulf Pub. Co., 1982. 91DiPippo R. Second law assessment of binary plants for power generation from low-temperature geothermal fluids. Geothermics 2004; 33: 565–586. 92Borsukiewicz-Gozdur A. Dual-fluid-hybrid power plant co-powered by low-temperature geothermal water. Geothermics 2010; 39: 170–176. 93Armstead HCH. Geothermal Energy. J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 1978. 94DiPippo R. Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications and Case Studies. Elsevier Advanced Technology: Oxford, England, 2005. 95DiPippo R. Chapter 9—Advanced geothermal energy conversion system. Geothermal Power Plants ( 3rd Edition), 2012; 183–221. 96Zarrouk SJ, Moon H. Efficiency of geothermal power plants: a worldwide review. Geothermics 2014; 51: 142–153. 97DiPippo R. Geothermal power plants: evolution and performance assessments. Geothermics 2015; 53: 291–307. 98Jalilinasrabady S, Itoi R, Valdimarsson P, Saevarsdottir G, Fujii H. Flash cycle optimization of Sabalan geothermal power plant employing exergy concept. Geothermics 2012; 43: 75–82. 99Bertani R. World geothermal power generation 2001–2005. Geothermal Resources Council Bulletin 2006; 35: 89–111. 100Schuster A, Karellas S, Aumann R. Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2010; 35: 1033–1039. 101Papadopoulos AI, Stijepovic M, Linke P. On the systematic design and selection of optimal working fluids for organic Rankine cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering 2010; 30: 760–769. 102Saleh B, Koglbauer G, Wendland M, Fischer J. Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2007; 32: 1210–1221. 103Fernández FJ, Prieto MM, Suárez I. Thermodynamic analysis of high-temperature regenerative organic Rankine cycles using siloxanes as working fluids. Energy 2011; 36: 5239–5249. 104Lai NA, Wendland M, Fischer J. Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2011; 36: 199–211. 105Zhang FZ, Jiang PX. Thermodynamic analysis of a binary power cycle for different EGS geofluid temperatures. Applied Thermal Engineering 2012; 48: 476–485. 106Thain I, DiPippo R. Hybrid geothermal-biomass power plants: applications, designs and performance analysis. In: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia, April 19–25, 2015 (in press). 107Jiang PX, Xu YJ, Shi RF, He S, Jackson JD. Experimental investigation of convection heat transfer of CO2 at super-critical pressures in vertical mini tubes and in porous media. Applied Thermal Engineering 2004; 24: 1255–1270. 108He S, Jiang PX, Xu YJ, Shi RF, Kim WS, Jackson JD. A computational study of convection heat transfer to CO2 at supercritical pressures in a vertical mini tube. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2005; 14: 521–530. 109Jiang PX, Zhang Y, Xu YJ, Shi RF. Experimental and numerical investigation of convection heat transfer of CO2 at supercritical pressures in a vertical tube at low Reynolds numbers. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2008; 47: 998–1011. 110Chen L, Zhang XR, Okajima J, Maruyama S. Thermal relaxation and critical instability of near-critical fluid microchannel flow. Physical Review E 2013; 043016. 111Chen L, Zhang XR, Okajima J, Maruyama S. Numerical simulation of near-critical fluid convective flow mixing in microchannels. Chemical Engineering Science 2013; 97: 67–80. 112Pan L, Oldenburg CM, Wu YS, Pruess K. Wellbore flow model for carbon dioxide and brine. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 71–78. 113Pan L, Webb SW, Oldenburg CM. Analytical solution for two-phase flow in a wellbore using the drift-flux model. Advances in Water Resources 2011; 34: 1656–1665. 114Pan L, Oldenburg CM. T2Well—an integrated wellbore-reservoir simulator. Computers & Geosciences 2014; 65: 46–55. 115Singhe AT, Ursin JR, Henninges J, Pusch G, Ganzer L. Modeling of temperature effects in CO2 injection wells. In: the 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies(GHGT-11), Kyoto, Japan, November 18–22, 2013. 116Goodarzi S, Settari A, Zoback M, Keith DW. Thermal aspects of geomechanics and induced fracturing in CO2 injection with application to CO2 sequestration in Ohio River Valley. SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization. Society of Petroleum Engineers: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 10–12 November, 2010; pp. 139706-MS. 117Ruan BL, Xu RN, Wei LL, Ouyang XL, Lu L, Jiang PX. Flow and thermal modeling of CO2 in injection well during geological sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013; 19: 271–280. 118Jiang PX, Li XL, Xu RN, Wang YS, Chen MS, Wang H, Ruan BL. Thermal modeling of CO2 in the injection well and reservoir at the Ordos CCS demonstration project, China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2014; 23: 135–146. 119Li XL, Xu RN, Wei LL, Jiang PX. Modelling of wellbore dynamics of a CO2 injector during transient well close-in and start-up Operations. Submit to International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 120Luo F, Xu RN, Jiang PX. Numerical investigation of fluid flow and heat transfer in a doublet enhanced geothermal system with CO2 as the working fluid (CO2-EGS). Energy 2014; 64: 307–322. 121Ueda A, Kato K, Ohsumi T, Yajima T, Ito H, Kaieda H, Meycalf R, Takase H. Experimental studies of CO2 rock interaction at elevated temperature under hydrothermal conditions. Geochemical Journal 2005; 39: 417–425. 122Muller N, Qi R, Mackie E, Pruess K, Blunt MJ. CO2 injection impairment due to halite precipitation. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 3507–3514. 123Zimmermann G, Reinicke A. Hydraulic stimulation of a deep sandstone reservoir to develop an enhanced geothermal system: laboratory and field experiments. Geothermics 2010; 39: 70–7. 124Magliocco M, Kneafsey TJ, Pruess K, Glaser S. Laboratory and numerical studies of heat extraction from hot porous media by means of supercritical CO2. In: Proceedings of TOUGH Symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, California, September 17-19, 2012. 125Atrens AD, Gurgenci H, Rudolph V. CO2 thermosiphon for competitive geothermal power generation. Energy & Fuels 2009; 23: 553–557. 126Atrens AD, Gurgenci H, Rudolph V. Electricity generation using a carbon-dioxide thermosiphon. Geothermics 2010; 39: 161–169. 127Xu T, Pruess K, Apps J. Numerical studies of fluid-rock interactions in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) with CO2 as working fluid. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-third Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University 2008: 185–92. 128Wan Y, Xu T, Pruess K. Impact of fluid-rock interactions on enhanced geothermal systems with CO2 as heat transmission fluid. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-sixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University 2011: 191–9. 129Fard MH, Hooman K, Chua HT. Numerical simulation of a supercritical CO2 geothermosiphon. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 2010; 37: 1447–1451. 130Atrens AD, Gurgenci H, Rudolph V. Economic optimization of a CO2-based EGS power plant. Energy and Fuels 2011; 25: 3765–3775. 131Zhang FZ, Jiang PX, Xu RN. System thermodynamic performance comparison of CO2-EGS and water-EGS systems. Applied Thermal Engineering 2013; 61: 236–244. 132Frank ED, Sullivan JL, Wang MQ. Life cycle analysis of geothermal power generation with supercritical carbon dioxide. Environmental Research Letters 2012; 7: 034030 (10pp). 133Borgia A, Pruess K, Kneafsey TJ, Oldenburg CM, Pan LH. Numerical simulation of salt precipitation in the fractures of a CO2-enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 2012; 44: 13–22. 134Xu TF, Feng G, Shi Y. On fluid–rock chemical interaction in CO2-based geothermal systems. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 2014; 144: 179–193. Citing Literature Volume39, Issue13Special Issue: Global Warming and Energetic Solutions25 October 2015Pages 1722-1741 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Encyclopedia of energy research and policy

Generating renewable energy

Numerical Modeling and Analysis of Nuclear Power, Solar Photovoltaic Power and Wind Power

Micro/Nanotransport Phenomena in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

Solar Thermal Energy Conversion and Utilization—new Research Horizon

Innovative Power Generation Technologies for Improved Household Energy Delivery and Sustainable Future: Classical Solutions from ENEA Research Centre, Trisaia Italy

Potential of Integrating Solar Energy into Systems of Thermal Power Generation, Cooling-Refrigeration, Hydrogen Production, and Carbon Capture

Solar thermal, photovoltaic, photovoltaic thermal, and photovoltaic thermal phase change material systems: A comprehensive reference guide

Thermodynamic And Exergoeconomic Analysis Of A Novel Solar-Assisted Multigenerational System Utilizing High Temperature Phase Change Material And Hybrid Nanofluid

High-performance Computing for Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Energy and Environment Applications

Nanoscale design to enable the revolution in renewable energy

Zero-carbon energy Kyoto 2012 : special edition of the Joint Symposium "Energy Science in the Age of Global Warming" of the Kyoto University Global COE Program and the JGSEE/CEE-KMUTT

A Review on Heat Transfer and Energy Conversion in the Enhanced Geothermal Systems with Water/co2as Working Fluid

A bibliometric evaluation and visualization of global solar power generation research: productivity, contributors and hot topics

Recent Advances in Direct Solar Thermal Power Generation

Assessment of a sustainable power generation system utilizing supercritical carbon dioxide working fluid: Thermodynamic, economic, and environmental analysis

Solar Photovoltaic and Thermal Energy Systems: Current Technology and Future Trends

Evaluation of Energy Efficiency and the Reduction of Atmospheric Emissions by Generating Electricity from a Solar Thermal Power Generation Plant

Development of an Integrated Solar-Biomass Energy System for Near-Zero Energy Buildings: A Technical and Environmental Study

Advancing energy transition with novel biomass-solar based multigeneration energy system using hydrogen and storage options for sustainable cities

Potential of Micro Gas Turbines to Provide Renewable Heat and Power in Off-Grid Applications for Desalination and Industrial Wastewater Treatment