A Review on Heat Transfer and Energy Conversion in the Enhanced Geothermal Systems with Water/co2as Working Fluid
Ruina Xu,Le Zhang,Fuzhen Zhang,Pei-Xue Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3352
IF: 4.6
2015-01-01
International Journal of Energy Research
Abstract:International Journal of Energy ResearchVolume 39, Issue 13 p. 1722-1741 Special Issue on Global Warming and Energetic Solutions A review on heat transfer and energy conversion in the enhanced geothermal systems with water/CO2 as working fluid Ruina Xu, Ruina Xu Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLe Zhang, Le Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFuzhen Zhang, Fuzhen Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPeixue Jiang, Corresponding Author Peixue Jiang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 China Correspondence: Peixue Jiang, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Ruina Xu, Ruina Xu Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorLe Zhang, Le Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFuzhen Zhang, Fuzhen Zhang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPeixue Jiang, Corresponding Author Peixue Jiang Beijing Key Laboratory for CO2 Utilization and Reduction Technology, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 China Correspondence: Peixue Jiang, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 14 July 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3352Citations: 40Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Summary Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) technology is regarded as the future of geothermal energy and could become a major energy source in the future. However, EGS technology is not well developed. The challenges of EGS technology development, such as the small heat-recovery factors and water limitations, need to be addressed. A comprehensive understanding of heat transfer in the complex subsurface structures is crucial for energy management in the reservoir, and an accurate heat transfer model of the reservoir is a key tool to optimize heat extraction to improve the heat-recovery factor. The use of CO2 as the EGS working fluid is regarded as an emerging technology to address water limitations. The analytical solutions, lab-scale experiments, field-scale modeling methods of water/CO2 fluid flow and heat transfer in the reservoir, and a thermodynamic analysis of the energy conversion system at the surface are reviewed in this paper. Based on the existing literature, future research should focus on improving our knowledge and optimizing the heat transfer performance in the reservoir. Moreover, the emerging design of a heat exchange network in the reservoir and CO2-EGS could result from technology development. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. References 1Tester JW, Anderson BJ, Batchelor AS, Blackwell DD, DiPippo R, Drake EM, Garnish J, Livesay B, Moore MC, Nichols K, Petty S, Toksoz MN, Veatch RWJr. The future of geothermal energy: impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, DOE Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 Final Report 2006. 2Goldstein B, Hiriart G, Bertani R, Bromley C, Gutiérrez-Negrín L, Huenges E, Muraoka H, Ragnarsson A, Tester J, Zui V. Geothermal energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation 2011. [ O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, K Seyboth, P Matschoss, S Kadner, T Zwickel, P Eickemeier, G Hansen, S Schlömer, C Stechow. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.] 3 Geothermal Energy Association, 2014 annual U.S. & global geothermal power production report, Washington, D.C. 2014. 4Duchane D, Brown D. Hot dry rock (HDR) geothermal energy research and development at Fenton Hill, New Mexico. In Geo-heat Centre Quarterly Bulletin, Vol. 23. Oregon Institute of Technology: Klamath Falls, Oregon, 2009; 13–19. 5Breede K, Dzebisashvili K, Liu XL, Falcone G. A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future. Geothermal Energy 2013; 1: 4. 6Horne RN, Tester JW. Geothermal energy: a scalable option for heat and power. In The Bridge (National Academy of Engineering: Washington, DC, submitted). 7Jeanloz R, Stone HA. JASON review of enhanced geothermal systems. PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-ninth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University: Stanford, California, February 24-26, 2014. 8Zhao XG, Wan G. Current situation and prospect of China's geothermal resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014; 32: 651–661. 9Wang GL. Assessment of geothermal resources in China. In: Proceedings of the 38th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University: Stanford, California, 11–13 February 2013. 10Wang GL. Strategic research on exploration and evaluation of geothermal resources. Geothermal Energy 2010; 6: 15–20. 11Wang J, Shengbiao H, Pang Z, et al. Estimate of geothermal resources potential for hot dry rock in the continental area of china. Science & Technology Review 2012; 30: 25–31. 12Li KW, Wang L, Mao XP, et al. Evaluation and efficient development of geothermal resource associated with oilfield. Science & Technology Review 2012; 30: 32–41. 13Pang ZH, Hu SB, Wang JY. A roadmap to geothermal energy development in China. Science & Technology Review 2012; 30: 18–24. 14Duan ZF, Pang ZH, Wang XY. Sustainability evaluation of limestone geothermal reservoirs with extended production histories in Beijing and Tianjin, China. Geothermics 2011; 40: 125–135. 15Beckers KF, Lukawski MZ, Anderson BJ, Moore MC, Tester JW. Levelized costs of electricity and direct-use heat from enhanced geothermal systems. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 2014; 6: 013141. 16Hofmann H, Weides S, Babadagli T, Zimmermann G, Moeck I, Majorowicz J, Unsworth M. Potential for enhanced geothermal systems in Alberta, Canada. Energy 2014; 69: 578–591. 17Hofmann H, Babadagli T, Zimmermann G. Hot water generation for oil sands processing from enhanced geothermal systems: process simulation for different hydraulic fracturing scenarios. Applied Energy 2014; 113: 524–547. 18Lacirignola M, Blanc I. Environmental analysis of practical design options for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) through life-cycle assessment. Renewable Energy 2013; 50: 901–914. 19Frick S, Kaltschmitt M, Schroeder G. Life cycle assessment of geothermal binary power plants using enhanced low-temperature reservoirs. Energy 2010; 35: 2281–94. 20Mines G, Nathwani J. Estimated power generation costs for EGS. In: Proceedings, Thirty-Eighth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University: Stanford, California, 11 February–13 February, 2013, SGP-TR-198. 21Harto C, Schroeder J, Martino L, Horner R, Clark C. Geothermal energy: the energy-water nexus. In: Proceedings of 38th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, SGP-TR-198, Stanford, CA, 2013. 22DeMeo EA, Galdo JF. Renewal Energy Technology Characterizations, Topical Report, TR-109496. Office of Utility Technologies, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, D.C, 1997. 23Brown DW. A hot day rock geothermal energy concept utilizing supercritical CO2 instead of water. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University 2000; 233–238. 24Pruess K. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) using CO2 as working fluid – a novel approach for generating renewable energy with simultaneous sequestration of carbon. Geothermics 2006; 35: 351–367. 25 B Metz, OR Davidson, PR Bosch, R Dave, LA Meyer (eds). Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), climate change 2007: migration of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. 26Mohan AR, Turaga U, Shembekar V, Elsworth D, Pisupati SV. Utilization of carbon dioxide from coal-based power plants as a heat transfer fluid for electricity generation in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Energy 2013; 57: 505–512. 27Zhang FZ, Jiang PX, Lin YS, Zhang YW. Efficiencies of subcritical and transcritical CO2 inverse cycles with and without an internal heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering 2011; 31: 432–438. 28Zhang XR, Yamaguchi H, Cao YH. Hydrogen production from solar energy powered supercritical cycle using carbon dioxide CO2 heat pumps: fundamental and applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010; 35: 4925–4932. 29Randolph JB, Saar MO. Combining geo-thermal energy capture with geologic carbon dioxide sequestration. Geophysical Research Letters 2011; 38: L10401. 30Pruess K. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): comparing water and CO2 as heat transmission fluids. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, Auckland, New Zealand, November 19-21, 2007. 31Pruess K. On production behavior of enhanced geothermal systems with CO2 as working fluid. Energy Conversion and Management 2008; 49: 1446–1454. 32Gallup DL. Production engineering in geothermal technology: a review. Geothermics 2009; 38: 326–334. 33Finsterle S, Zhang YQ, Pan LH, Dobson P, Oglesby K. Microhole arrays for improved heat mining from enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 2013; 47: 104–115. 34Sausse J, Genter A. Types of permeable fractures in granite. Petrophysical properties of crystalline rocks. Geological Society, London. Special Publications 2005; 240: 1–14. 35Berman AS. Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. Journal of Applied Physics 1953; 24: 1232–1235. 36Beavers GS, Joseph DD. Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1967; 30: 197–207. 37Beavers GS, Sparrow EM, Magnuson RA. Experiments on coupled parallel flows in a channel and bounding porous medium. Transactions of the ASME—Journal of Basic Engineering 1970; 92: 843–848. 38Gustafson CW. Leakage losses from a hydraulic fracture and fracture propagation. Physics of Fluids 1988; 31: 3180–3187. 39Mohais R, Xu CS, Dowd P. Fluid flow and heat transfer within a single horizontal fracture in an enhanced geothermal system. Journal of Heat Transfer 2011; 13:112603-1-8. 40Mohais R, Xu C, Dowd PA, Hand M. Permeability correction factor for fractures with permeable walls. Geophysical Research Letters 2012; 39: L03403. 41Bodvarsson GS, Tsang CF. Injection and thermal breakthrough in fractured geothermal reservoirs. Journal of Geophysical Research 1987; B2: 1031–1048. 42Cheng AHD, Ghassemi A, Detournay E. Integral equation solution of heat extraction from a fracture in hot dry rock. International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2001; 25: 1327–1338. 43Jung Y, Pruess K. A closed-form analytical solution for thermal single-well injection-withdrawal tests. Water Resources Research 2012; 47: W03504. 44Zhao J. Experimental studies of the hydro-thermo-mechanical behavior of joints in granite. PhD thesis, Imperial College, London, 1987. 45Zhao ZH. On the heat transfer coefficient between rock fracture walls and flowing fluid. Computers and Geotechnics 2014; 59: 105–111. 46Zhao J. Geothermal testing and measurements of rock and rock fractures. Geothermics 1994; 23: 215–31. 47 J Zhao. Analytical and experimental studies of heat convection by water flow in rock fractures. In: JR Tillerson, WR Wawersik, (eds.). Proceedings of 33rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Rotterdam: Balkema 1992; 591–6. 48Zhao J, Tso CP. Heat transfer by water flow in rock fractures and the application to hot dry rock geothermal systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstracts 1993; 30: 631–41. 49Ogino F, Mukai K, Kamata M. Heat transfer from the hot dry rock to water flowing through crack. Heat Transfer Japanese Research 1994; 23: 658–673. [Translated from Journal of the Geothermal Research Society of Japan, 1994; 15: 23–29.] 50Ogino F, Yamamura M. Pressure drop of water flow between injection and production wells intersected by a circular fracture. Geothermics 1998; 27: 25–41. 51Ogino F, Yamamura M, Fukuda T. Heat transfer from hot dry rock to water flowing through a circular fracture. Geothermics 1999; 28: 21–24. 52Bataille A, Genthon P, Rabinowicz M, Fritz B. Modeling the coupling between free and forced convection in a vertical permeable slot: implications for the heat production of an enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 2006; 35: 654–82. 53Lu W, Xiang YY. Experiments and sensitivity analyses for heat transfer in a meter-scale regularly fractured granite model with water flow. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering) 2012; 13: 958–968. 54Zhang DX, Kang QJ. Pore scale simulation of solute transport in fractured porous media. Geophysical Research Letters 2004; 31: L12504. 55Mora P, Wang YC, Alonso-Marroquin F. Particle-based simulation of hydraulic fracture and fluid/heat flow in geothermal reservoirs. AIP Conference Proceedings 2013; 1542: 177–180. 56Hayashi K, Willis-Richards J, Hopkirk RJ, Niibori Y. Numerical models of HDR geothermal reservoirs e a review of current thinking and progress. Geothermics 1999; 28: 507–18. 57Jiang PX, Ren ZP. Numerical investigation of forced convection heat transfer in porous media using a thermal non-equilibrium model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 2001; 22: 102–110. 58Jiang PX, Ren ZP, Wang BX. Numerical simulation of forced convection heat transfer in porous plate channels using thermal equilibrium or non-thermal equilibrium models. Numerical Heat Transfer Part A 1999; 35: 99–113. 59Ouyang XL, Jiang PX, Xu RN. Thermal boundary conditions of local thermal non-equilibrium model for convection heat transfer in porous media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2013; 60: 31–40. 60Blocher MG, Zimmermann G, Moeck I, Brandt W, Hassanzadegan A, Magri F. 3D numerical modeling of hydrothermal processes during the lifetime of a deep geothermal reservoir. Geofluids 2010; 10: 406–21. 61Zeng YC, Wu NY, Su Z, Wang XX, Hu J. Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through a novel single vertical fracture at Desert Peak geothermal field. Energy 2013; 63: 268–282. 62Zeng YC, Wu NY, Su Z, Hu J. Numerical simulation of electricity generation potential from fractured granite reservoir through a single horizontal well at Yangbajing geothermal field. Energy 2014; 65: 472–487. 63Zeng YC, Su Z, Wu NY. Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through two horizontal wells at Desert Peak geothermal field. Energy 2013; 56: 92–107. 64Huang XX, Zhu JL, Niu CK, Li J, Hu X, Jin XP. Heat extraction and power production forecast of a prospective enhanced geothermal system site in Songliao Basin, China. Energy 2014; 75: 360–370. 65Zhang YJ, Li ZW, Guo LL, Gao P, Jin XP, Xu TF. Electricity generation from enhanced geothermal systems by oilfield produced water circulating through reservoir stimulated by staged fracturing technology for horizontal wells: a case study in Xujiaweizi area in Daqing Oilfield, China. Energy 2014; 78: 788–805. 66Shaik AR, Rahman SS, Tran NH, Tran T. Numerical simulation of fluid-rock coupling heat transfer in naturally fractured geothermal system. Applied Thermal Engineering 2011; 31: 1600–1606. 67Jiang FM, Luo L, Chen JL. A novel three-dimensional transient model for subsurface heat exchange in enhanced geothermal systems. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 2013; 41: 57–62. 68Chen JL, Luo L, Jiang FM. Analyzing heat extraction and sustainability of EGS with a novel model. Journal of Earth Science and Engineering 2013; 3: 690–700. 69Zhang L, Luo F, Xu RN, Jiang PX, Liu HH. Heat transfer and fluid transport of supercritical CO2 in enhanced geothermal systems with local thermal non-equilibrium model. 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Texas, USA, 5–9 October 2014. 70Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N. A thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled model in local thermal non-equilibrium for fractured HDR reservoir with double porosity. Journal of Geophysical Research 2012; 117: B07205. 71Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N. Thermal recovery from a fractured medium in local thermal non-equilibrium. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2013; 37: 2471–2501. 72Achenbach E. Heat and flow characteristics of packed beds. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 1995; 10: 17–27. 73Wakao N. Particle-to-fluid transfer coefficients and fluid diffusivities at low flow rate in packed beds. Chemical Engineering Science 1976; 31: 1115–1122. 74Dixon AG, Cresswell DL. Theoretical prediction of effective heat-transfer parameters in packed-beds. AIChE Journal 1979; 25: 663–676. 75Kar KK, Dybbs A. Internal heat transfer coefficients of porous metals. Heat Transfer in Porous Media. ASME. New York 1982; 81–91. 76Xu RN, Huang YL, Jiang PX, Wang BX. Internal heat transfer coefficients in microporous media with rarefaction effects. Science China Technological Sciences 2012; 55: 2869–2876. 77Ouyang XL, Xu RN, Jiang PX. Three-equation Local Thermal Non-equilibrium Model for Transient Heat Transfer in Porous Media: A New Approach, Submitted to International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2015. 78Perera MSA, Ranjith PG. Carbon dioxide sequestration effects on coal's hydro-mechanical properties: a review. International Journal of Energy Research 2012; 36: 1015–1031. 79Pruess K, Oldenburg CM, Moridis GM. 1999. E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory report LBNL-43134.,TOUGH2 User's GuideVersion 2. 80Hu LH, Winterfeld PH, Fakcharoenphol P, Wu YS. A novel fully-coupled flow and geomechanics model in enhanced Geothermal reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2013; 107: 1–11. 81Xu TF, Pruess K, Brimhall G. An improved equilibrium-kinetics speciation algorithm for redox reactions in variably saturated subsurface flow systems. Computers & Geosciences 1999; 25: 655–666. 82Xu TF, Pruess K. Modeling multiphase non-isothermal fluid flow and reactive geochemical transport in variably saturated fractured rocks: 1 Methodology. American Journal of Science 2001; 301: 16–33. 83Xu TF, Sonnenthal EL, Spycher N, Pruess K. TOURGHREACT: a simulation program for non-isothermal multiphase reactive geochemical transport in variably saturated geologic media. Computers & Geosciences 2006; 32: 145–165. 84Xu TF. Incorporation of aqueous reaction kinetics and biodegradation into TOUGHREACT: application of a multi-region model to hydrobiogeochemical transport of denitrification and sulfate reduction. Vadose Zone Journal 2008; 7: 305–315. 85Xu TF. TOUGHREACT version 2.0: a simulator for subsurface reactive transport under non-isothermal multiphase flow conditions. Computers & Geosciences 2011; 37: 763–774. 86Xu TF, Ontoy Y, Molling P, Spycher N, Parini M, Pruess K. Reactive transport modeling of injection well scaling and acidizing at Tiwi field, Philippines. Geothermics 2004; 33: 477–491. 87Taron J, Elsworth D, Min KB. Numerical simulation of thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in deformable, fractured porous media. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2009; 9: 167–177. 88Taron J, Elsworth D. Thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in the evolution of engineered geothermal reservoirs. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2009; 46: 855–864. 89Ghassemi A, Zhou X. A three-dimensional thermo-poroelastic model for fracture response to injection/extraction in enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 2011; 40: 39–49. 90Edwards LM. Handbook of Geothermal Energy. Houston Gulf Pub. Co., 1982. 91DiPippo R. Second law assessment of binary plants for power generation from low-temperature geothermal fluids. Geothermics 2004; 33: 565–586. 92Borsukiewicz-Gozdur A. Dual-fluid-hybrid power plant co-powered by low-temperature geothermal water. Geothermics 2010; 39: 170–176. 93Armstead HCH. Geothermal Energy. J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 1978. 94DiPippo R. Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications and Case Studies. Elsevier Advanced Technology: Oxford, England, 2005. 95DiPippo R. Chapter 9—Advanced geothermal energy conversion system. Geothermal Power Plants ( 3rd Edition), 2012; 183–221. 96Zarrouk SJ, Moon H. Efficiency of geothermal power plants: a worldwide review. Geothermics 2014; 51: 142–153. 97DiPippo R. Geothermal power plants: evolution and performance assessments. Geothermics 2015; 53: 291–307. 98Jalilinasrabady S, Itoi R, Valdimarsson P, Saevarsdottir G, Fujii H. Flash cycle optimization of Sabalan geothermal power plant employing exergy concept. Geothermics 2012; 43: 75–82. 99Bertani R. World geothermal power generation 2001–2005. Geothermal Resources Council Bulletin 2006; 35: 89–111. 100Schuster A, Karellas S, Aumann R. Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2010; 35: 1033–1039. 101Papadopoulos AI, Stijepovic M, Linke P. On the systematic design and selection of optimal working fluids for organic Rankine cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering 2010; 30: 760–769. 102Saleh B, Koglbauer G, Wendland M, Fischer J. Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2007; 32: 1210–1221. 103Fernández FJ, Prieto MM, Suárez I. Thermodynamic analysis of high-temperature regenerative organic Rankine cycles using siloxanes as working fluids. Energy 2011; 36: 5239–5249. 104Lai NA, Wendland M, Fischer J. Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles. Energy 2011; 36: 199–211. 105Zhang FZ, Jiang PX. Thermodynamic analysis of a binary power cycle for different EGS geofluid temperatures. Applied Thermal Engineering 2012; 48: 476–485. 106Thain I, DiPippo R. Hybrid geothermal-biomass power plants: applications, designs and performance analysis. In: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia, April 19–25, 2015 (in press). 107Jiang PX, Xu YJ, Shi RF, He S, Jackson JD. Experimental investigation of convection heat transfer of CO2 at super-critical pressures in vertical mini tubes and in porous media. Applied Thermal Engineering 2004; 24: 1255–1270. 108He S, Jiang PX, Xu YJ, Shi RF, Kim WS, Jackson JD. A computational study of convection heat transfer to CO2 at supercritical pressures in a vertical mini tube. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2005; 14: 521–530. 109Jiang PX, Zhang Y, Xu YJ, Shi RF. Experimental and numerical investigation of convection heat transfer of CO2 at supercritical pressures in a vertical tube at low Reynolds numbers. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2008; 47: 998–1011. 110Chen L, Zhang XR, Okajima J, Maruyama S. Thermal relaxation and critical instability of near-critical fluid microchannel flow. Physical Review E 2013; 043016. 111Chen L, Zhang XR, Okajima J, Maruyama S. Numerical simulation of near-critical fluid convective flow mixing in microchannels. Chemical Engineering Science 2013; 97: 67–80. 112Pan L, Oldenburg CM, Wu YS, Pruess K. Wellbore flow model for carbon dioxide and brine. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 71–78. 113Pan L, Webb SW, Oldenburg CM. Analytical solution for two-phase flow in a wellbore using the drift-flux model. Advances in Water Resources 2011; 34: 1656–1665. 114Pan L, Oldenburg CM. T2Well—an integrated wellbore-reservoir simulator. Computers & Geosciences 2014; 65: 46–55. 115Singhe AT, Ursin JR, Henninges J, Pusch G, Ganzer L. Modeling of temperature effects in CO2 injection wells. In: the 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies(GHGT-11), Kyoto, Japan, November 18–22, 2013. 116Goodarzi S, Settari A, Zoback M, Keith DW. Thermal aspects of geomechanics and induced fracturing in CO2 injection with application to CO2 sequestration in Ohio River Valley. SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization. Society of Petroleum Engineers: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 10–12 November, 2010; pp. 139706-MS. 117Ruan BL, Xu RN, Wei LL, Ouyang XL, Lu L, Jiang PX. Flow and thermal modeling of CO2 in injection well during geological sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013; 19: 271–280. 118Jiang PX, Li XL, Xu RN, Wang YS, Chen MS, Wang H, Ruan BL. Thermal modeling of CO2 in the injection well and reservoir at the Ordos CCS demonstration project, China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2014; 23: 135–146. 119Li XL, Xu RN, Wei LL, Jiang PX. Modelling of wellbore dynamics of a CO2 injector during transient well close-in and start-up Operations. Submit to International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 120Luo F, Xu RN, Jiang PX. Numerical investigation of fluid flow and heat transfer in a doublet enhanced geothermal system with CO2 as the working fluid (CO2-EGS). Energy 2014; 64: 307–322. 121Ueda A, Kato K, Ohsumi T, Yajima T, Ito H, Kaieda H, Meycalf R, Takase H. Experimental studies of CO2 rock interaction at elevated temperature under hydrothermal conditions. Geochemical Journal 2005; 39: 417–425. 122Muller N, Qi R, Mackie E, Pruess K, Blunt MJ. CO2 injection impairment due to halite precipitation. Energy Procedia 2009; 1: 3507–3514. 123Zimmermann G, Reinicke A. Hydraulic stimulation of a deep sandstone reservoir to develop an enhanced geothermal system: laboratory and field experiments. Geothermics 2010; 39: 70–7. 124Magliocco M, Kneafsey TJ, Pruess K, Glaser S. Laboratory and numerical studies of heat extraction from hot porous media by means of supercritical CO2. In: Proceedings of TOUGH Symposium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, California, September 17-19, 2012. 125Atrens AD, Gurgenci H, Rudolph V. CO2 thermosiphon for competitive geothermal power generation. Energy & Fuels 2009; 23: 553–557. 126Atrens AD, Gurgenci H, Rudolph V. Electricity generation using a carbon-dioxide thermosiphon. Geothermics 2010; 39: 161–169. 127Xu T, Pruess K, Apps J. Numerical studies of fluid-rock interactions in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) with CO2 as working fluid. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-third Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University 2008: 185–92. 128Wan Y, Xu T, Pruess K. Impact of fluid-rock interactions on enhanced geothermal systems with CO2 as heat transmission fluid. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-sixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University 2011: 191–9. 129Fard MH, Hooman K, Chua HT. Numerical simulation of a supercritical CO2 geothermosiphon. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 2010; 37: 1447–1451. 130Atrens AD, Gurgenci H, Rudolph V. Economic optimization of a CO2-based EGS power plant. Energy and Fuels 2011; 25: 3765–3775. 131Zhang FZ, Jiang PX, Xu RN. System thermodynamic performance comparison of CO2-EGS and water-EGS systems. Applied Thermal Engineering 2013; 61: 236–244. 132Frank ED, Sullivan JL, Wang MQ. Life cycle analysis of geothermal power generation with supercritical carbon dioxide. Environmental Research Letters 2012; 7: 034030 (10pp). 133Borgia A, Pruess K, Kneafsey TJ, Oldenburg CM, Pan LH. Numerical simulation of salt precipitation in the fractures of a CO2-enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 2012; 44: 13–22. 134Xu TF, Feng G, Shi Y. On fluid–rock chemical interaction in CO2-based geothermal systems. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 2014; 144: 179–193. Citing Literature Volume39, Issue13Special Issue: Global Warming and Energetic Solutions25 October 2015Pages 1722-1741 ReferencesRelatedInformation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Optimal selection of working fluid for enhanced geothermal systems: A comparative analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide and water under various reservoir and extraction conditions
Jiajie Yang,J.G. Wang,Wei Liang,Peibo Li,Rui Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.122947
IF: 6.4
2024-03-20
Applied Thermal Engineering
Abstract:Geothermal energy is widely recognized as a highly promising clean energy due to its abundant reserve and low carbon footprint. The extraction of geothermal energy does not only depend on the stimulated reservoir volume but also depends on working fluid. Water (H 2 O) is usually used as the working fluid but carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) can be a good alterative working fluid. However, the suitable conditions and extraction efficiency of CO 2 compared to H 2 O have been unclear. This study compares the efficiency of heat extraction from an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) by using supercritical CO 2 or H 2 O as working fluid and identifies the favorable or unfavorable conditions for each working fluid. Firstly, a thermal–hydraulic-mechanical (THM) coupling model is established and validated by two analytical solutions. Secondly, the performance of a typical EGS is evaluated with four indicators. Finally, a comparative analysis for heat extraction efficiency is performed with CO 2 and H 2 O under different reservoir and extraction conditions. The analysis results reveal that under most conditions, the heat extraction rate of CO 2 is 1.4–2.2 times that of H 2 O in the early stage and the final cumulative heat recovery is 0.8–1.9 times that of H 2 O. CO 2 is more efficient in reservoirs with low permeability (no more than 2.5 mD), low injection pressure (no more than 28 MPa, or 8 MPa for pressure difference) and low temperature (no more than 35°C), while H 2 O performs better in reservoirs with high permeability (no less than 5.0 mD), high injection pressure (no less than 32 MPa, or 12 MPa for pressure difference) and high injection temperature (no less than 40°C). Furthermore, more pronounced thermal breakthrough and inadequate heat extraction are observed in reservoirs with high porosity and high injection pressure when CO 2 is the working fluid.
energy & fuels,engineering, mechanical,thermodynamics,mechanics
-
Heat Production Performance from an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) Using CO2 as the Working Fluid
Wentao Zhao,Yilong Yuan,Tieya Jing,Chenghao Zhong,Shoucheng Wei,Yulong Yin,Deyuan Zhao,Haowei Yuan,Jin Zheng,Shaomin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16207202
IF: 3.2
2023-10-23
Energies
Abstract:CO2-based enhanced geothermal systems (CO2-EGS) are greatly attractive in geothermal energy production due to their high flow rates and the additional benefit of CO2 geological storage. In this work, a CO2-EGS model is built based on the available geological data in the Gonghe Basin, Northwest China. In our model, the wellbore flow is considered and coupled with a geothermal reservoir to better simulate the complex CO2 flow and heat production behavior. Based on the fractured geothermal reservoir at depths between 2900 m and 3300 m, the long-term (30-year) heat production performance is predicted using CO2 as the working fluid with fixed wellhead pressure. The results indicate that the proposed CO2-EGS will obtain an ascending heat extraction rate in the first 9 years, followed by a slight decrease in the following 21 years. Due to the significant natural convection of CO2 (e.g., low viscosity and density) in the geothermal reservoir, the mass production rate of the CO2-EGS will reach 150 kg/s. The heat extraction rates will be greater than 32 MW throughout the 30-year production period, showing a significant production performance. However, the Joule–Thomson effect in the wellbore will result in a drastic decrease in production temperature (e.g., a 62.6 °C decrease in the production well). This means that the pre-optimization analyses and physical material treatments are required during geothermal production using CO2 as the working fluid.
energy & fuels
-
Technical analysis of a novel economically mixed CO 2 -Water enhanced geothermal system
Zhenqian Xue,Haoming Ma,Zhe Sun,Chengang Lu,Zhangxin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141749
IF: 11.1
2024-03-16
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:Geothermal energy has undoubtedly been considered a promising low-carbon resource in future energy supply responding to the rising energy demand and severe climate concerns. CO 2 has been demonstrated as a comparable alternative for water in developing an Enhanced geothermal system (EGS), which simultaneously unlocks the potential to sequester CO 2 against climate concerns. However, an earlier thermal breakthrough is always observed owing to higher mobility in geothermal reservoirs for CO 2 -EGS, and an expensive cost of CO 2 consumption makes CO 2 -EGS challenging to achieve economic profitability. In this study, a novel CO 2 -water-EGS is proposed to investigate the feasibility of solving the obstacles in conventional EGSs. An integrated analysis for multiple EGS scenarios is carried out from both the technical and economic perspectives. The effects of a CO 2 -water ratio, an injection rate and a flow scheme are comprehended. Followed by the determination of an optimal operating strategy. In the results, by reasonably selecting a CO 2 mass ratio and an injection rate, CO 2 -water-EGS can recover more geothermal energy and earn more profits than water-EGS and CO 2 -EGS. The injection rate shows positive correlations to heat mining, carbon storage, and economic performance, while the impact of a flow scheme is negligible when the total volume of injected fluids remains consistent. From the optimization study, the CO 2 -water-EGS with the 110 kg/s injection rate and 20%wt CO 2 ratio shows the highest Net Present Value (NPV) of 42.4 M$. This study proposes theoretical guidance to operators in their decision-making processes on the development of CO 2 -water-EGS.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
-
Research Progress on CO2 as Geothermal Working Fluid: A Review
Lianghan Cong,Shuaiyi Lu,Pan Jiang,Tianqi Zheng,Ziwang Yu,Xiaoshu Lü
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215415
IF: 3.2
2024-10-31
Energies
Abstract:With the continuous increase in global greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of climate change are becoming increasingly severe. In this context, geothermal energy has gained significant attention due to its numerous advantages. Alongside advancements in CO2 geological sequestration technology, the use of CO2 as a working fluid in geothermal systems has emerged as a key research focus. Compared to traditional water-based working fluids, CO2 possesses lower viscosity and higher thermal expansivity, enhancing its mobility in geothermal reservoirs and enabling more efficient heat transfer. Using CO2 as a working fluid not only improves geothermal energy extraction efficiency but also facilitates the long-term sequestration of CO2 within reservoirs. This paper reviews recent research progress on the use of CO2 as a working fluid in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS), with a focus on its potential advantages in improving heat exchange efficiency and power generation capacity. Additionally, the study evaluates the mineralization and sequestration effects of CO2 in reservoirs, as well as its impact on reservoir properties. Finally, the paper discusses the technological developments and economic analyses of integrating CO2 as a working fluid with other technologies. By systematically reviewing the research on CO2 in EGS, this study provides a theoretical foundation for the future development of geothermal energy using CO2 as a working fluid.
energy & fuels
-
Geochemical mechanisms of water/CO 2 -rock interactions in EGS and its impacts on reservoir properties: A review
Binbin Gao,Yiman Li,Zhonghe Pang,Tianming Huang,Yanlong Kong,Bin Li,Fen Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.102923
IF: 4.566
2024-01-30
Geothermics
Abstract:Geothermal energy from Hot Dry Rock (HDR) with poor permeability is recognized as a potential future energy source, and it can be exploited by Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) technology. In this paper, geochemical mechanisms of typical working fluids interacting with the primary rock types of EGS reservoirs, and their impacts on reservoir properties are summarized. While traditional EGS primarily utilizes granite reservoirs, the technology has been gradually extended to include sandstone and carbonate rock formations. Regarding the working fluid, water is currently the only one that has been put into practice. Mineral dissolution and precipitation and salt precipitation are the two dominant geochemical mechanisms during the heat extraction process using water or CO 2 . These mechanisms are influenced by fluid pH, reservoir temperature, pressure, and flow rate. The dissolution of feldspar minerals plays an important role in increasing permeability and the availability of cations for the precipitation of secondary minerals. Carbonate minerals are often the quickest to respond to changes in fluid chemistry induced by CO 2 injection, and the re-precipitation of carbonates is triggered by increasing temperature and pH. It is difficult to predict variations in permeability due to the involvement of many factors, including particle sizes and salt precipitation. The mechanical properties of rocks are significantly weakened following interactions with working fluids. The weakening effect on rock mechanical properties is more pronounced when CO 2 is injected into water-saturated formations. Although water-rock interactions can change the thermal conductivity of the rock, the characteristics of fracture networks appear to be of greater importance because working fluids mainly flow through fractures, and maximizing heat extraction from EGS depends strongly on effective circulation. Further economic evaluations for CO 2 -EGS are necessary to confirm the economic viability of using CO 2 as a working fluid. Additionally, the THMCB (Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical-Biological) coupling effects during water/CO 2 interactions should be comprehensively studied based on both long-term field tests and truly integrated numerical models.
energy & fuels,geosciences, multidisciplinary
-
Thermodynamic Analysis Of Energy Conversion Systems Of Co2-Based Egs
Fuzhen Zhang,Peixue Jiang
2011-01-01
Abstract:With an expanding economy and increased electrification of our society, China is concerned about its long term energy supply. Enhanced geothermal resources (EGS) have an enormous potential for supplying electricity extracting and utilizing the earth's stored thermal energy. Most attempts to develop EGS have used water as the heat transmission fluid. However CO2 has certain physical and chemical properties that are advantageous for EGS systems, so CO2 can be instead of water as the heat transmission fluid; which would also provide geologic sequestration of CO2 as an ancillary benefit. This paper presents a series of CO2-based energy conversion systems designed for the temperatures and pressures of EGS reservoirs. However the thermal efficiencies of the CO2-based EGS power cycles are less than that of water-based EGS cycles. The thermal efficient of CO2-based EGS is improved with a combined cycle that makes full use of the thermal energy. The total thermal efficiency of the combined cycles is then increased to greater than that of water-based EGS for identical conditions.
-
Progress and Prospect of Mid-Deep Geothermal Reinjection Technology
Jing Hu,Yan-guang Liu,Xin Wang,Ying-nan Zhang,Mei-hua Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/jgse.2024.9280024
2024-01-01
Journal of groundwater science and engineering
Abstract:Mid-deep geothermal reinjection technology is crucial for the sustainable development of geothermal resources, which has garnered significant attention and rapid growth in recent years. Currently, various geothermal reinjection technologies lag behind, lacking effective integration to address issues like low reinjection rates and thermal breakthrough. This paper reviews the basic principles and development history of mid-deep geothermal reinjection technology, focusing on various technical methods used in the process and analyzing their applicability, advantages, and disadvantages under different geological conditions. It highlights the unique challenges posed by deep geothermal resources, including high temperature, high pressure, high stress, chemical corrosion, and complex geological structures. Additionally, it addresses challenges in equipment selection and durability, system stability and operation safety, environmental impact, and sustainable development. Finally, the paper explores future directions for mid-deep geothermal reinjection technology, highlighting key areas for further research and potential pathways for technological innovation. This comprehensive analysis aims to accelerate the advancement of geothermal reinjection technology, offering essential guidance for the efficient reinjection and sustainable development of geothermal resources.
-
Reservoir stimulation design and evaluation of heat exploitation of a two-horizontal-well enhanced geothermal system (EGS) in the Zhacang geothermal field, Northwest China
Yu Zhang,Yanjun Zhang,Ling Zhou,Zhihong Lei,Liangliang Guo,Jian Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.101
IF: 8.7
2022-01-01
Renewable Energy
Abstract:A bottom hole temperature of 214 °C at 4700 m shows good potential for the development of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) in the ZR2 well, Zhacang geothermal field, China. A reservoir stimulation plan has to be established to optimize the use of this target reservoir, with the objectives of increasing heat extraction and ensuring the service life. In this study, we used the lab parameters, ZR2 well logging data, and inverted in-situ stress data to conduct a numerical investigation to optimize reservoir stimulation and develop geothermal extraction strategies for the granodiorite reservoir at depths of 4100–4700 m. The results indicate that gel-proppant hydraulic fracturing and a two-horizontal-well system are feasible for this tight and unconfined reservoir. An installed capacity of 5.57 MW –6.80 MW and total power generation of 1695 GW · h are expected under the optimal combination of an injection temperature of 7.2 °C, an injection rate of 50 kg/s, and fracture spacing of 50 m during the 30-year operation period. The final production temperature will be maintained at approximately 171.3 °C, and the temperature drop is only 10.7%. The proposed geothermal engineering project will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 0.57–1.98 Mt compared to a fossil fuel plant. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is estimated at 0.0413 $ / kW · h , which is much lower than the industrial electricity price of Qinghai province; thus, this project has significant development potential from an economic perspective.
energy & fuels,green & sustainable science & technology
-
Numerical analysis and economic evaluation of pinnate horizontal well for supercritical CO2-based enhanced geothermal system
Jingxuan Xie,Jiansheng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102850
IF: 4.566
2024-01-01
Geothermics
Abstract:Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) is considered an alternative heat carrier for enhanced geothermal system due to its superior thermophysical property. Extensive investigations have been conducted to improve the heat extraction performance of scCO2-based EGS. However, few investigations have focused on the response mechanism of thermal reservoir for the scCO2-based EGS with fully coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical (THM) method. The evaluation differences between THM and TH coupling model are still not clear for the scCO2-based EGS. To further improve the heat extraction performance of scCO2-based EGS, a pinnate horizontal well (PHW) EGS is proposed in present work. Three-dimensional (3D) model with fully coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical (THM) is established considering the in-situ stress, which is used to evaluate the geothermal energy utilization and economic performance of PHW EGS. The effects of injection-production parameters, reservoir properties and fracture parameters on the heat extraction performance of PHW are probed. The results revealed that reservoir permeability shows a descending tendency while fracture aperture experiences a significant increase, when the effects of in-situ stress are taken into account. If the in-situ stress is ignored, the production temperature and maximum useful work will be overestimated by about 13 K and 16.4%, respectively. PHW EGS is characterized by the low pump consumption, high system efficiency and net revenue. Compared with doublet EGS, pump power is decreased by 58.1%, the system efficiency is boosted by 2.6 times, and the net revenue is increased by 35.3% at the terminal stage. It has been proved that the heat extraction performance is evidently affected by the injection flow rate and temperature of working fluid, initial reservoir permeability, initial aperture and maximum closure. Appropriate operation strategy can effectively improve the performance of PHW EGS. In addition, the optimized average electricity price, accumulative income and net revenue of PHW EGS can reach to 0.251 CNY/(kW·h), 9.27 × 108 CNY and 6.65 × 108 CNY after 40 years of operation, respectively.
energy & fuels,geosciences, multidisciplinary
-
System Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of CO2-EGS and Water-Egs Systems
Fu-Zhen Zhang,Pei-Xue Jiang,Rui-Na Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.08.007
IF: 6.4
2013-01-01
Applied Thermal Engineering
Abstract:CO2 may be a better heat transmission fluid than water for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). The advantages and disadvantages of these two kinds of EGS are the focus of this study. The water and CO2-EGS system models including simple subsurface heat transfer and flow models and a surface energy conversion system model were designed based on the reservoir grade and the ambient temperatures. The results indicate that the operating parameters including the injection pressure, turbine outlet pressure and reservoir stimulated area should be optimized to match the actual CO2-EGS conditions. CO2-EGS produce more power than water-EGS for reservoirs with low recoverable thermal energies due to less irreversible losses compared to ORC or flash cycles for water-EGS. However, high resistance losses caused by high mass flow rates degrade the CO2-EGS performance; thus, the water-EGS has better performance than CO2-EGS for larger energy content reservoirs. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
-
Research Progress on Temperature Field Evolution of Hot Reservoirs under Low-Temperature Tailwater Reinjection
Xin Wang,Guo-qiang Zhou,Yan-guang Liu,Ying-nan Zhang,Mei-hua Wei,Kai Bian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/jgse.2024.9280016
2024-01-01
Journal of groundwater science and engineering
Abstract:This paper focuses on the study of the evolutionary mechanism governing the temperature field of geothermal reservoir under low-temperature tailwater reinjection conditions, which is crucial for the sustainable geothermal energy management. With advancing exploitation of geothermal resources deepens, precise understanding of this mechanism becomes paramount for devising effective reinjection strategies, optimizing reservoir utilization, and bolstering the economic viability of geothermal energy development. The article presents a comprehensive review of temperature field evolution across diverse heterogeneous thermal reservoirs under low-temperature tailwater reinjection conditions, and analyzes key factors influencing this evolution. It evaluates existing research methods, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The study identifies gaps in the application of rock seepage and heat transfer theories on a large scale, alongside the need for enhanced accuracy in field test results, particularly regarding computational efficiency of fractured thermal reservoir models under multi-well reinjection conditions. To address these shortcomings, the study proposes conducting large-scale rock seepage and heat transfer experiments, coupled with multi-tracer techniques for field testing, aimed at optimizing fractured thermal reservoir models' computational efficiency under multi-well reinjection conditions. Additionally, it suggests integrating deep learning methods into research endeavors. These initiatives are of significance in deepening the understanding of the evolution process of the temperature field in deep thermal reservoirs and enhancing the sustainability of deep geothermal resource development.
-
Numerical Simulation on Heat Recovery Efficiency of Different Working Fluids in High-Temperature Rock Mass
Xu Dong,Haozhe Geng,Guan Hao,Pan Li,Yi Teng,Wen Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1468825
IF: 2.006
2021-10-04
Geofluids
Abstract:It is of great significance for the sustainable development of global energy to develop hot dry rock (HDR) geothermal resources by using enhanced geothermal system (EGS) technology. Different working fluids in EGS have different heat recovery efficiencies. Therefore, this paper takes water and CO2 as the heat-carrying media and establishes a thermal hydraulic mechanical coupling model to simulate the heat recovery process in high-temperature rock mass. By considering the different confining pressures, rock temperature, and injection pressure, the advantages of H2O-EGS and CO2-EGS are obtained. The results show that with the increase of confining pressure, the heat recovery efficiency of water is significantly higher than that of CO2, but at higher reservoir temperature, CO2 has more advantages as a heat-carrying medium. The net heat extraction rate will increase with the increase of injection pressure, which indicates that the mass flow rate plays a leading role in the heat recovery process and increases the injection pressure of fluid which is more conducive to the thermal recovery of EGS. This study will provide a technical guidance for thermal energy exploitation of hot dry rock under different geological conditions.
geochemistry & geophysics,geology
-
Integrated technological and economic feasibility comparisons of enhanced geothermal systems associated with carbon storage
Zhenqian Xue,Haoming Ma,Yizheng Wei,Wei Wu,Zhe Sun,Maojie Chai,Chi Zhang,Zhangxin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122757
IF: 11.2
2024-02-05
Applied Energy
Abstract:Enhanced geothermal system (EGS) demonstrates low carbon intensity for supplying electricity but it has not been widely developed commercially. Although the engineering feasibility of different operational strategies has been illustrated, the energy industry is still ambiguous in economic aspects; in particular, incorporating carbon policies into the decision-making process is necessary. In this study, an evaluation framework from technical and economic perspectives considering the impact of carbon credit is introduced for the first time to compare six EGS working schemes including two well configurations and three flow strategies. Afterwards, sensitivity analyses are performed with respect to six technical parameters and four economic constraints. Key findings in this study prove that mixed CO 2 -water horizontal-well-EGS achieves the most profitability with an NPV of $35.3 million. CO 2 -EGS can produce the greatest geothermal power and carbon storage, but the high CO 2 consumption is a major obstacle to achieving profitability. Compared to water-EGS, mixed CO 2 -water EGS shows a greater profit gained the advantage from carbon storage even with less geothermal energy harvesting. Regarding various well types, the horizontal well system can earn more profits than the vertical well system if the thermal breakthrough is not serious. The sensitivity analyses suggest that the parameters that dominate fluid injection amount and flow rate shall be assigned the highest priority. The electricity market price is another critical factor, and a mixed CO 2 -water EGS project is recommended to start according to the rising trend of the electricity sale price. This study provides an informative decision-making strategy for EGS stakeholders.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
-
Review of high-temperature geothermal drilling and exploitation technologies
Xianzhi Song,Gensheng Li,Zhongwei Huang,Yu Shi,Gaosheng Wang,Guofeng Song,Fuqiang Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.10.013
IF: 6.1
2022-10-30
Gondwana Research
Abstract:Global warming induced by excessive carbon dioxide emission generated from fossil fuels consumption is becoming increasingly severe. Development and utilization of clean and renewable energy is a significant measure to contribute for the carbon neutrality. Geothermal resource is an important clean and renewable energy, because of its advantages of abundant reserves, exploitation without restrictions from the climate and season. Extracting heat from the high temperature geothermal reservoir requires well drilling, completion and fracturing. However, due to some particular conditions in geothermal development, such as high temperature, erosion, leakage, and hard rocks, traditional petroleum well drilling and completion technologies are not well applicable in the geothermal industry. In this paper, the state-of-the-art geothermal drilling, and completion technologies as well as several fracturing methods, such as foam drilling, air hammer drilling, hydrothermal jet drilling, expansion casing technology, high temperature resistant drilling fluid and cement, chemical stimulation and thermal stimulation are comprehensively reviewed. Besides, heat extraction performances of water and CO 2 as working fluids in the geothermal system are discussed. A few novel heat extraction methods including closed loop, open loop, enhanced geothermal systems are compared and analyzed. This review is expected to provide suggestions for research fields worthy of study for geothermal drilling and exploitation.
geosciences, multidisciplinary
-
Thermodynamic analysis of enhanced geothermal systems using impure CO2 as the geofluid
Fuzhen Zhang,Ruina Xu,Pei-Xue Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.126
IF: 6.4
2016-01-01
Applied Thermal Engineering
Abstract:Numerical simulations have indicated that pure CO2 is superior to water for wellbore hydraulics and for recovering heat from hot fractured rock. However, CO2 captured from power plants may contain impurities such as nitrogen, oxygen and particles. Rather than treating CO2 as merely a waste fluid to be stored in the deep subsurface, impure CO2 may also be used as a geofluid in EGS to extract heat energy from the hot dry rock while permanently storing the CO2 in the rock. Thus, the system performance with impure CO2 must be evaluated for large-scale CO2 utilization. This paper presents an entire cycle model for the flow in the wellbore, the heat extraction and the flow in the reservoir to model the system based on the reservoir parameters and ambient temperatures. The pressure and temperature profiles of the impure CO2 in the injection well and the production well, the power output and the thermal efficiency for an impure CO2-EGS were simulated by a FORTRAN code. The result clarifies the basic principles for the system optimization and the ORC working fluid selection for the impure CO2-EGS. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
-
Coupled Thermal–hydraulic–mechanical Model for an Enhanced Geothermal System and Numerical Analysis of Its Heat Mining Performance
Luming Zhou,Zhende Zhu,Xinghua Xie,Yunjin Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.014
IF: 8.7
2022-01-01
Renewable Energy
Abstract:The operation of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) involves a complex thermal-hydraulic-mechanical (THM) coupling process, which is important for exploiting the geothermal energy contained in hot dry rocks. In this study, the THM coupling mechanism in an EGS reservoir is explained, and a fully coupled THM mathematical model with local thermal nonequilibrium of a dual media is established, considering the dynamic changes in the properties of the rock matrix, fractures, and fluid during EGS operation. The model is verified through an example of the thermoelastic consolidation of a saturated soil. The heat transfer, fluid flow, and mechanical characteristics of a geothermal reservoir over 40 years are studied via a numerical simulation of a 2D geometric model. The effects of fracture occurrence, coupling conditions, and model parameters on the mining performance are analyzed. The results show that the dual-media model can reflect the anisotropy in the temperature, pressure, and stress due to the presence of fractures. An area with a more complex fracture network and smaller spacing is found to be more conducive for heat transfer. The inlet-outlet pressure differences, thermal expansion coefficient of the rock matrix, and initial fracture permeability have significant effects. When the inlet-outlet pressure difference is increased from 4 to 10 MPa, the heat extraction ratio increases from 56% to 89% at 40 years, and the initial output thermal power is increased from 9.2 to 24.9 MW. When the coefficient of thermal expansion is increased from 1 x 10(-6) to 7 x 10(-6) K-1, the heat extraction ratio is increased from 54% to 84%, and the initial output thermal power is increased from 8.5 to 19.7 MW. When the initial permeability is increased from 1 x 10(-11) to 2.5 x 10(-11) m(2), the heat extraction ratio increases from 74% to 92%. These results provide a reference for optimizing the mining effect of the EGS. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
-
Heat extraction of novel underground well pattern systems for geothermal energy exploitation
Peixue Jiang,Xiaolu Li,Ruina Xu,Fuzhen Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.062
IF: 8.7
2016-01-01
Renewable Energy
Abstract:The current Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) with a fractured reservoir undergoes several practical issues, such as scaling in the wellbore, the mass flow loss into the reservoir, and the challenge in designing the placement of production wells. In this paper, novel underground well pattern systems were proposed for geothermal energy exploitation. A numerical model of two kinds well pattern systems (multi-horizontal-wells system and annular-wells system) were setup taking into account the heat exchange with the surrounding formation. The numerical model was validated by the logging data from Ordos CO2 geological storage demonstration project, China. A comparison between the well pattern system and a fractured reservoir was conducted based on European EGS site at Groβ Schonebekc, Germany. Results showed that when the horizontal well length of well pattern system was about 10 times to the fractured reservoir, the production wellhead temperature and pressure of eight horizontal wells system with CO2 were respectively 38.9 °C higher and 10.9 MPa higher than that of the fractured reservoir system with CO2 after 20 years at a flow rate of 20 kg/s, an injection temperature of 20 °C and an injection pressure of 10 MPa, showing a significant application potential of the well pattern system.
-
Numerical Investigation of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in a Doublet Enhanced Geothermal System with CO2 As the Working Fluid (CO2–EGS)
Feng Luo,Rui-Na Xu,Pei-Xue Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.048
IF: 9
2014-01-01
Energy
Abstract:Enhanced geothermal system with CO2 instead of water as the working fluid (CO2–EGS ) has attracted much interest due to the additional benefit of CO2 geological storage during the power generation process. This paper describes numerical analyses of a doublet CO2–EGS system, focusing on the influence of the CO2 injection rate, the permeability of induced fractures near the wellbores, the injection/production well perforation placement, the working fluid, and the heat transfer between the wellbores and the surrounding reservoir. The larger permeability in the induced fractures around the wellbores allows the fluid to more easily flow through the reservoir up to a critical fracture permeability, with further increases of the fracture permeability further reducing the pressure loss a little but the cost is not worth the added benefit. Induced fractures around the wellbores result in little difference among different wellbores perforation locations in the reservoir. Increased CO2 injection rates reduce the heat transfer between the wellbores and the surrounding reservoir so that this heat transfer can be neglected at large mass flow rates. With CO2 as the working fluid, the CO2 temperature decreases significantly going up the production well. This paper presents some important implications for CO2–EGS system for further numerical studies as well as for practical projects.
-
A Study of Numerical Simulations for Enhanced Geothermal Reservoir Parameters and Thermal Extraction Based on Microseismic Data
MA Zihan,XING Huilin,JIN Guodong,TAN Yuyang,YAN Weichao,LI Sihai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202112010
2022-01-01
Abstract:The development of clean, stable, and renewable hot dry rock geothermal energy is significant for alleviating the energy crisis, reducing environmental pollution, and improving human health. Enhanced geothermal system (EGS) is an advanced technology for developing geothermal energy efficiently by stimulating hot dry rock reservoir. This technology involves a complex hydro-thermal coupling process. A numerical approach is usually applied for analyzing heat extraction. In this paper, taking the geothermal reservoir of the Cooper basin in Australia as the research object, two models–a 3D zonal homogeneous permeability model and a heterogenious permeability model – are established based on the measured microseismic data of hydraulic fracturing. The latter one is inversed from microseismic data. The temperature field, seepage field and thermal performance of the reservoir are numerically studied, and their differences are compared and analyzed. The results show that with the same injection-production flow rate, fluid flows more quickly from the injection well to the production well while the temperature drops relatively more rapidly in the inhomogeneous model due to the dominant channel revealed by dense microseismic events near the wellbore. In the homogeneous model, the dominant flow channel is not as pronounced as in the previous model, and the temperature decreases more slowly. During the operation of the geothermal reservoir model, the change in heat recovery of the zonal homogeneous model is relatively stable, with a decline of 3.74%, and that of the inhomogeneous model is rather obvious, with a decline of 12.72%. Compared with the inhomogeneous model, a smaller temperature drop and a higher heat recovery exist in the homogeneous model. However, the permeability in the actual reservoir is uneven, and the simulated heat recovery of the zonal homogenization model is higher than the actual recovery. Therefore, the simulation results of the inhomogeneous model have more reference significance for practical engineering.
-
Geothermal Energy in Sedimentary Basins: Assessing Techno-economic Viability for Sustainable Development
Orkhan Khankishiyev,Saeed Salehi,Runar Nygaard,Danny Rehg
2024-02-06
Abstract:Drilling deep geothermal wells has proven to be a challenging endeavor, primarily due to issues such as loss circulation events, material limitations under high temperatures, and the production of corrosive fluids. Furthermore, the substantial upfront costs, coupled with geological and technical obstacles associated with drilling super-hot EGS wells in igneous rocks, hinder the widespread implementation of geothermal systems. Alternatively, geothermal energy development in sedimentary basins presents an opportunity for clean energy production with relatively lower investment costs compared to the development of super-hot EGS in igneous rocks. Sedimentary basins exhibit attractive temperatures for geothermal applications, and their wide distribution enhances the potential for nationwide deployment. Decades of drilling and development experience in oil and gas wells have yielded a wealth of data, knowledge, and expertise. Leveraging this experience and data for geothermal drilling can significantly reduce costs associated with subsurface data gathering, well drilling, and completion. This paper explores the economic viability of geothermal energy production systems in sedimentary basins. The study encompasses an analysis of time-to-hit-temperature (THT) and cost-to-hit-temperature (CHT) parameters, as well as Favorability maps across the United States. These maps are based on factors such as well depth, total drilling time, well cost, and subsurface temperature data. By integrating sedimentary basin maps and underground temperature maps, the THT and CHT maps can facilitate the strategic placement of EGS wells and other geothermal system applications in the most favorable locations across the United States.
Geophysics