Surface roughness and optical characteristics evaluations after chairside adjustment of different zirconia types

Awab Abdulmajeed,Taiseer A. Sulaiman,Abdulhaq A. Suliman,Aous A. Abdulmajeed,Timo O. Närhi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13246
2024-05-09
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Abstract:Statement of Problem Limited evidence is available for the effect of chairside adjustment using rotary cutting instruments on the surface roughness and optical properties of different zirconia types. Purpose To evaluate the effect of simulated adjustments on surface roughness and optical properties of different zirconia types. Materials and Methods Three Partially Stabilized Zirconia (PSZ) types based on mole percent yttria (Y) concentration from the same manufacturer (Katana; Kuraray) were used: 3Y‐PSZ, 4Y‐PSZ, and 5Y‐PSZ. Thirty disk‐shaped specimens (Ø14 × 1.2 mm) from different zirconia types (N = 90) were prepared. Specimens were either left without adjustment (NA), adjusted with Dialite ZR finishing and polishing system (Brasseler) (APol), or adjusted with course diamond instruments only (ADia). The specimens were distributed into 9 groups (n = 10): Group 3Y‐PSZ/NA, Group 3Y‐PSZ/APol, Group 3Y‐PSZ/ADia, Group 4Y‐PSZ/NA, Group 4Y‐PSZ/APol, Group 4Y‐PSZ/ADia, Group 5Y‐PSZ/NA, Group 5Y‐PSZ/APol, and Group 5Y‐PSZ/ADia. The surface roughness of specimen was analyzed using an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) (Bruker's Dimension Icon, Bruker) and Root Means Square (RMS) were recorded (nm). Surface Gloss (SG), Translucency Parameter (TP), and Contrast Ratio (CR) values of all groups were recorded using an integrating sphere spectrophotometer. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple comparison tests for pairwise comparisons at p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?