History of Quantum Mechanics or the Comedy of Errors

Jean Bricmont

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.00294

2017-03-01

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:The goal of this paper is to explain how the views of Albert Einstein, John Bell and others, about nonlocality and the conceptual issues raised by quantum mechanics, have been rather systematically misunderstood by the majority of physicists.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

From Einstein's Theorem to Bell's Theorem: A History of Quantum Nonlocality

H. M. Wiseman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510600581011

2006-02-08

Abstract:In this Einstein Year of Physics it seems appropriate to look at an important aspect of Einstein's work that is often down-played: his contribution to the debate on the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Contrary to popular opinion, Bohr had no defence against Einstein's 1935 attack (the EPR paper) on the claimed completeness of orthodox quantum mechanics. I suggest that Einstein's argument, as stated most clearly in 1946, could justly be called Einstein's reality-locality-completeness theorem, since it proves that one of these three must be false. Einstein's instinct was that completeness of orthodox quantum mechanics was the falsehood, but he failed in his quest to find a more complete theory that respected reality and locality. Einstein's theorem, and possibly Einstein's failure, inspired John Bell in 1964 to prove his reality-locality theorem. This strengthened Einstein's theorem (but showed the futility of his quest) by demonstrating that either reality or locality is a falsehood. This revealed the full nonlocality of the quantum world for the first time.

Quantum Physics,History and Philosophy of Physics
The Problems of Quantum Mechanics and Possible Solutions : Copenhagen Interpretation, Many Worlds Interpretation, Transactional Interpretation, Decoherence and Quantum Logic

Rochelle Forrester

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776786

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper reviews some of the literature on the philosophy of quantum mechanics. The publications involved tend to follow similar patterns of first identifying the mysteries, puzzles or paradoxes of the quantum world, and then discussing the existing interpretations of these matters, before the authors produce their own interpretations, or side with one of the existing views. The paper will show that all interpretations of quantum mechanics involve elements of apparent weirdness. They suggest that the quantum world, and possibly our macro world, exists or behaves in a way quite contrary to the way we normally imagine they should. The paper will also show how many of the writers on quantum mechanics misunderstand idealism in the macro world as proposed by philosophers such as George Berkeley, David Hume, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill and misunderstand the concept of the observer dependent universe. The paper concludes by examining the similarities between the idealist view of the macro world and the Copenhagen Interpretation of the quantum world and suggests that as the Copenhagen Interpretation provides a view of the quantum world that is consistent with the macro world then the Copenhagen Interpretation should be the preferred view of the quantum world.
A Dynamic Histories Interpretation of Quantum Theory

Timothy D. Andersen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.04244

2020-08-21

Abstract:The problem of how to interpret quantum mechanics has persisted for a century. The disconnect between the wavefunction state vector and what is observed in experimental apparati has had no shortage of explanations. But all explanations so far fall short of a compelling and complete interpretation. In this letter, I present a novel interpretation called dynamic histories. I show mathematically how quantum mechanics can be reinterpreted as deterministically evolving dynamical world lines in a 5D universe. Quantum probabilities can be then be reinterpreted as stemming from ignorance of the state of our own world line. Meanwhile, the lack of observed superposition in experimental apparati is explained in that we only live on a single history with a definite set of properties. Hence, superposition is not an actual state of a particle but a model of ignorance as in classical probability theory. This explains nonlocal effects without superluminal communication. I also discuss how this relates to 5D Kaluza-Klein theory.

General Physics
Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing?

Federico Laudisa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-9997-4

2018-04-03

Erkenntnis

Abstract:I show why old and new claims on the role of counterfactual reasoning for the EPR argument and Bell’s theorem are unjustified: once the logical relation between locality and counterfactual reasoning is clarified, the use of the latter does no harm and the nonlocality result can well follow from the EPR premises. To show why, after emphasizing the role of incompleteness arguments that Einstein developed before the EPR paper, I critically review more recent claims that equate the use of counterfactual reasoning with the assumption of a strong form of realism and argue that such claims are untenable.
Quantum magic: A skeptical perspective

Giorgio Torrieri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1107.3800

2011-11-30

Abstract:Quantum mechanics (QM) has attracted a considerable amount of mysticism, in public opinion and even among academic researches, due to some of its conceptually puzzling features, such as the modification of reality by the observer and entanglement. We argue that many popular "quantum paradoxes" stem from a confusion between mathematical formalism and physics; We demonstrate this by explaining how the paradoxes go away once a different formalism, usually inconvenient to perform calculations, is used. we argue that some modern developments, well-studied in the research literature but generally overlooked by both popular science and teaching-level literature, make quantum mechanics (that is, "canonical" QM, not extensions of it) less conceptually problematic than it looks at first sight. When all this is looked at together, most "conceptual puzzles" of QM are not much different from the well-known paradoxes from probability theory. Consequently, "explanations of QM" involving physical action of consciouses or an infinity of universes are conceptually unnecessary

History and Philosophy of Physics,Popular Physics
History of the NeoClassical Interpretation of Quantum and Relativistic Physics

Shiva Meucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.01846

2018-03-30

Abstract:The need for revolution in modern physics is a well known and often broached subject, however, the precision and success of current models narrows the possible changes to such a great degree that there appears to be no major change possible. We provide herein, the first step toward a possible solution to this paradox via reinterpretation of the conceptual-theoretical framework while still preserving the modern art and tools in an unaltered form. This redivision of concepts and redistribution of the data can revolutionize expectations of new experimental outcomes. This major change within finely tuned constraints is made possible by the fact that numerous mathematically equivalent theories were direct precursors to, and contemporaneous with, the modern interpretations. In this first of a series of papers, historical investigation of the conceptual lineage of modern theory reveals points of exacting overlap in physical theories which, while now considered cross discipline, originally split from a common source and can be reintegrated as a singular science again. This revival of an older associative hierarchy, combined with modern insights, can open new avenues for investigation. This reintegration of cross-disciplinary theories and tools is defined as the Neoclassical Interpretation.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Quantum Probabilities and Paradoxes of the Quantum Century

V. P. Belavkin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0512415

2005-12-17

Abstract:A history and drama of the development of quantum probability theory is outlined starting from the discovery of the Plank's constant exactly a 100 years ago. It is shown that before the rise of quantum mechanics 75 years ago, the quantum theory had appeared first in the form of the statistics of quantum thermal noise and quantum spontaneous jumps which have never been explained by quantum mechanics. Moreover, the only reasonable probabilistic interpretation of quantum theory put forward by Max Born was in fact in irreconcilable contradiction with traditional mechanical reality and classical probabilistic causality. This led to numerous quantum paradoxes, some of them due to the great inventors of quantum theory such as Einstein and Schroedinger. They are reconsidered in this paper from the modern quantum probabilistic point of view.

Probability,Mathematical Physics
Quantum histories and quantum gravity

Joe Henson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/174/1/012020

2009-06-01

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Abstract:This paper reviews the histories approach to quantum mechanics. This discussion is then applied to theories of quantum gravity. It is argued that the results of all measurements in suitably defined classical situations can be identified with properties of the histories. This observation has significance for the formulation of new theories (such as quantum gravity theories) as it puts a constraint on the kinematics, if the quantum/classical correspondence principle is to be preserved. Consequences for quantum gravity, particularly for Lorentz symmetry and the idea of emergent geometry, are discussed.

English Else
Uncovering the Hidden Defects of the Basic Equations of Quantum Mechanics on the Basis of Scientific Philosophy

,Altayev Namaz Karabalievich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47363/jpsos/2024(6)260

2024-08-31

Journal of Physics & Optics Sciences

Abstract:From the very beginning of his development, Einstein was very critical of the main results of quantum mechanics. That is why in 1925, when the main papers on matrix mechanics were published, he wrote to his friend Besso [1] as follows: "The most interesting theoretical achievement of recent times is the Heisenberg-Born-Jordan theory of quantum states. A real witchcraft calculus in which infinite determinants (matrices) appear instead of Cartesian coordinates. It is highly witty and, due to its complexity, is insured against proving erroneous." In this connection I wish to say the following. A lot of time has passed since this thought was made. Therefore it makes sense to try to prove that the results of matrix mechanics actually contain defects. In the paper an attempt is made to prove that it is really so.
A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Gustavo Rodrigues Rocha,Dean Rickles,Florian J. Boge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.05280

2021-03-09

Abstract:It will be presented in this chapter a historical account of the consistent histories interpretation of quantum mechanics based on primary and secondary literature. Firstly, the formalism of the consistent histories approach will be outlined. Secondly, the works by Robert Griffiths and Roland Omnès will be discussed. Griffiths' seminal 1984 paper, the first physicist to have proposed a consistent-histories interpretation of quantum mechanics, followed by Omnès' 1990 paper, were instrumental to the consistent-histories model based on Boolean logic. Thirdly, Murray Gell-Mann and James Hartle's steps to their own version of consistent-histories approach, motivated by a cosmological perspective, will then be described and evaluated. Gell-Mann and Hartle understood that spontaneous decoherence could path the way to a concrete physical model to Griffiths' consistent histories. Moreover, the collective biography of these figures will be put in the context of the role played by the Santa Fe Institute, co-founded by Gell-Mann in 1984 in Santa Fe, New Mexico, where Hartle is also a member of the external faculty.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
On the strangeness of quantum mechanics

Marcello Poletti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00582-w

2022-06-06

Abstract:The extravagances of quantum mechanics never fail to enrich daily the debate around natural philosophy. Entanglement, non-locality, collapse, many worlds, many minds, and subjectivism have challenged generations of thinkers. Its approach can perhaps be placed in the stream of quantum logic, in which the "strangeness" of quantum mechanics is "measured" through the violation of Bell's inequalities and, from there, attempts an interpretative path that preserves realism yet ends up overturning it, restating the fundamental mechanisms of QM as a logical necessity for a strong realism.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
Spin-1 photons, spin-1/2 electrons, Bell's inequalities, and Feynman's special perspective on quantum mechanics

Masud Mansuripur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2633646

2022-10-07

Abstract:The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox that argues for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics as a description of physical reality has been put to rest by John Bell's famous theorem, which inspired numerous experimental tests and brought about further affirmations of quantum reality. Nevertheless, in his writings and public presentations, Richard Feynman never acknowledged the significance of Bell's contribution to the resolution of the EPR paradox. In this paper, we discuss several variants of the Bell inequalities (including one that was specifically espoused by Feynman), and explore the ways in which they demolish the arguments in favor of local hidden-variable theories. We also examine the roots of Feynman's attitude toward Bell's theorem in the context of Feynman's special perspective on quantum mechanics.

Quantum Physics,Optics
Quantum Mechanics: Harbinger of a Non-Commutative Probability Theory?

Basil J. Hiley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54943-4_2

2014-08-25

Abstract:In this paper we discuss the relevance of the algebraic approach to quantum phenomena first introduced by von Neumann before he confessed to Birkoff that he no longer believed in Hilbert space. This approach is more general and allows us to see the structure of quantum processes in terms of non-commutative probability theory, a non-Boolean structure of the implicate order which contains Boolean sub-structures which accommodates the explicate classical world. We move away from mechanical `waves' and `particles' and take as basic what Bohm called a {\em structure process}. This enables us to learn new lessons that can have a wider application in the way we think of structures in language and thought itself.

Quantum Physics
Decoherent Histories and Realism

Angelo Bassi,GianCarlo Ghirardi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9912031

1999-12-08

Abstract:We reconsider the Decoherent Histories approach to Quantum Mechanics and we analyze some problems related to its interpretation which, according to us, have not been adequately clarified by its proponents. We put forward some assumptions which, in our opinion, are necessary for a realistic interpretation of the probabilities that the formalism attaches to decoherent histories. We prove that such assumptions, unless one limits the set of the decoherent families which can be taken into account, lead to a logical contradiction. The line of reasoning we will follow is conceptually different from other arguments which have been presented and which have been rejected by the supporters of the Decoherent Histories approach. The conclusion is that the Decoherent Histories approach, to be considered as an interesting realistic alternative to the orthodox interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, requires the identification of a mathematically precise criterion to characterize an appropriate set of decoherent families which does not give rise to any problem.

Quantum Physics
Causality and relativity in quantum physics

Johan F. Prins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0607209

2006-07-24

Abstract:It is argued here that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics violates the tenets on which both Galileo's and Einstein's theories of relativity are based. It is postulated that the "building blocks" of the universe are not "particles" but are holistic wave-entitities which act and interact with other wave-entities as one would expect from waves. A new approach to model the free electron is presented. It is argued from Coulomb's law that the electromagnetic quantum-field energy is not part of an electric field surrounding the electron, but is localised, so that it is wholly equal to the mass of the electron. It is found that an energy component must also exist along a fourth spatial dimension which could be the origin of the "dark energy" in the universe and which, in turn, should be responsible for "vacuum-fluctuations" as governed by Heisenberg's uncertainty relationship for energy and time. The possible consequences of this approach are analysed and discussed.

General Physics
Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is Incorrect

Guang-Liang Li,Victor O. K. Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0509089

2005-01-01

Abstract:(A point-by-point response to a comment (quant-ph/0509130) on our paper (quant-ph/0509089) is added as Appendix C. We find the comment incorrect.) Einstein's criticism of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is an important part of his legacy. Although most physicists consider Einstein's criticism technically unfounded, we show that the Copenhagen interpretation is actually incorrect, since Born's probability explanation of the wave function is incorrect due to a false assumption on "continuous probabilities" in modern probability theory. "Continuous probability" means a "probability measure" that can take every value in a subinterval of the unit interval (0, 1). We prove that such "continuous probabilities" are invalid. Since Bell's inequality also assumes "continuous probabilities", the result of the experimental test of Bell's inequality is not evidence supporting the Copenhagen interpretation. Although successful applications of quantum mechanics and explanation of quantum phenomena do not necessarily rely on the Copenhagen interpretation, the question asked by Einstein 70 years ago, i.e., whether a complete description of reality exists, still remains open.
Bohr and von Neumann on the Universality of Quantum Mechanics: Materials for the History of the Quantum Measurement Process

Federico Laudisa

2024-05-13

Abstract:The Bohr and von Neumann views on the measurement process in quantum mechanics have been interpreted for a long time in somewhat controversial terms, often leading to misconceptions. On the basis of some textual analysis, I would like to show that, contrary to a widespread opinion, their views should be taken less inconsistent, and much closer to each other, than usually thought. As a consequence, I claim that Bohr and von Neumann are conceptually on the same side on the issue of the universality of quantum mechanics: hopefully, this might contribute to a more accurate history of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
A centennial reappraisal of Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics with a perspective on Einstein's Quantum Riddle

Tuck C. Choy

2023-08-08

Abstract:Heisenberg's breakthrough in his July 1925 paper that set in motion the development of Quantum Mechanics through subsequent papers by Born, Jordan, Heisenberg and also Dirac (from 1925 to 1927) is reexamined through a modern lens. In this paper, we shall discuss some new perspectives on (i) what could be the guiding intuitions for his discoveries and (ii) the origin of the Born-Jordan-Heisenberg canonical quantization rule. From this vantage point we may get an insight into Einstein's Quantum Riddle (Lande1974,Sommerfeld1918,Born1926) and a possible glimpse of what might come next after the last 100 years of Heisenberg's quantum mechanics.

Quantum Physics,History and Philosophy of Physics
Quantum Mechanics in a New Light

Ulrich Mohrhoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9487-6

2017-04-30

Abstract:Although the present paper looks upon the formal apparatus of quantum mechanics as a calculus of correlations, it goes beyond a purely operationalist interpretation. Having established the consistency of the correlations with the existence of their correlata (measurement outcomes), and having justified the distinction between a domain in which outcome-indicating events occur and a domain whose properties only exist if their existence is indicated by such events, it explains the difference between the two domains as essentially the difference between the manifested world and its manifestation. A single, intrinsically undifferentiated Being manifests the macroworld by entering into reflexive spatial relations. This atemporal process implies a new kind of causality and sheds new light on the mysterious nonlocality of quantum mechanics. Unlike other realist interpretations, which proceed from an evolving-states formulation, the present interpretation proceeds from Feynman's formulation of the theory, and it introduces a new interpretive principle, replacing the collapse postulate and the eigenvalue--eigenstate link of evolving-states formulations. Applied to alternatives involving distinctions between regions of space, this principle implies that the spatiotemporal differentiation of the physical world is incomplete. Applied to alternatives involving distinctions between things, it warrants the claim that, intrinsically, all fundamental particles are identical in the strong sense of numerical identical. They are the aforementioned intrinsically undifferentiated Being, which manifests the macroworld by entering into reflexive spatial relations.

Quantum Physics,History and Philosophy of Physics
Views, variety and quantum mechanics

Lee Smolin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.03539

2021-05-08

Abstract:A non-local hidden variables theory for non-relativisitic quantum theory is presented, which gives a realist completion of quantum mechanics, in the sense of a complete description of individual events. The proposed fundamental theory is an extension of an energetic causal set theory, which assumes that time, events, causal structure, momentum and energy are fundamental. But space and the wave function are emergent. The beables of the theory are the views of the events, which are a subset of their causal pasts. Thus, this theory asserts that the universe is a causal network of events, which consists of partial views of itself as seen by looking backwards from each event. The fundamental dynamics is based on an action whose potential energy is proportional to the variety, which is a measure of the diversity of the views of the events, while the kinetic energy is proportional to its rate of change. The Schroedinger equation is derived to leading order in an expansion in density of the events of the fundamental histories. To higher order, there are computable corrections, non-linear in the wave function, from which new physical effects may be predicted.

Quantum Physics

History of Quantum Mechanics or the Comedy of Errors

From Einstein's Theorem to Bell's Theorem: A History of Quantum Nonlocality

The Problems of Quantum Mechanics and Possible Solutions : Copenhagen Interpretation, Many Worlds Interpretation, Transactional Interpretation, Decoherence and Quantum Logic

A Dynamic Histories Interpretation of Quantum Theory

Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing?

Quantum magic: A skeptical perspective

History of the NeoClassical Interpretation of Quantum and Relativistic Physics

Quantum Probabilities and Paradoxes of the Quantum Century

Quantum histories and quantum gravity

Uncovering the Hidden Defects of the Basic Equations of Quantum Mechanics on the Basis of Scientific Philosophy

A Brief Historical Perspective on the Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

On the strangeness of quantum mechanics

Spin-1 photons, spin-1/2 electrons, Bell's inequalities, and Feynman's special perspective on quantum mechanics

Quantum Mechanics: Harbinger of a Non-Commutative Probability Theory?

Decoherent Histories and Realism

Causality and relativity in quantum physics

Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is Incorrect

Bohr and von Neumann on the Universality of Quantum Mechanics: Materials for the History of the Quantum Measurement Process

A centennial reappraisal of Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics with a perspective on Einstein's Quantum Riddle

Quantum Mechanics in a New Light

Views, variety and quantum mechanics