Fracture analysis of one/two-piece clinically failed zirconia dental implants

Fei Zhang,Mona Monzavi,Maoyin Li,Stevan Čokić,Al Manesh,Hessam Nowzari,Jef Vleugels,Bart Van Meerbeek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.08.004

IF: 5.687

2022-10-01

Dental Materials

Abstract:ObjectivesAnalyzing factors that may have led to fracture of zirconia implants by macro/micro-fractography.MethodsSix one-piece and ten two-piece full-ceramic zirconia implants from two manufacturers, Z-Systems and CeraRoot, were retrieved after clinical failure. The time-to-failure ranged from 3 to 49 months. Optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to analyze the fracture planes at the macro- and microscopic level. Treatment planning, surgical protocol, fracture-origin location and characteristic fracture features were assessed.ResultsThe fracture of all implants seemed to have been primarily due to overload in bending mode, while the fracture-initiation sites varied for the one- and two-piece implants. The fracture of all one-piece implants originated in the constriction region between two threads in the endosseous implant part. For two-piece implants, the abutment neck, internal abutment-implant connections and inner threads were found to be the main fracture-initiation sites. Surface defects at the root area for one-piece implants and damages at the abutment surface for two-piece implants were connected to the fracture origins. Importantly, the clinical failures of implants were often found to result from combined effects related to patient aspects, treatment planning/protocols, a high bending moment at the weakest link, implant-surface conditions and specific implant designs.SignificanceThis study provided information to be considered for future optimization of treatment planning and the surgical protocol for zirconia implants. Optimization of the surface conditions and the zirconia-starting powder were also suggested.

materials science, biomaterials,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine