Abstract:This paper develops a new theoretical framework to analyze Chinese regulatory governance by considering the strategic interaction between four key players involved in the regulatory process: the top leadership, the regulators, the firms and the public. By focusing on China’s great reversal in regulating the platform economy, I argue that China’s volatile style of policymaking is deeply ingrained in its authoritarian governance, where power is centralized in the top leadership who also suffers from a chronic information deficit. This often leads to a policy control mechanism that fluctuates between very lax and very harsh enforcement. More specifically, I show how government support, firm lobbying and bureaucratic inertia together contributed to a lag in regulating online platforms. When a crisis loomed, the top leadership quickly mobilized all administrative resources and propaganda to initiate a law enforcement campaign against tech giants. However, without strong judicial oversight, aggressive agency interventions create the risk of over-enforcement and administrative abuse. Thus far, China’s reorientation of its policy control has significantly bolstered its regulatory capacity across various fronts including financial, antitrust and data regulation. By exerting greater oversight over platform governance, the government has pressured tech firms to transfer their wealth to their users and the public to combat income inequality. The government’s heavy-handed approach has also afforded it great leverage to nudge tech firms to prioritize on cutting-edge technologies, and to steer them away from foreign stock markets, thus reducing reliance on the West for both technologies and capital. Despite the campaign’s immediate impact, it remains to be seen whether it will bring about lasting changes, especially in light of the persistent lobbying from tech firms and the risk of regulatory capture. At the same time, the volatile policy swing has itself generated risks and uncertainties for both social welfare and global investment, which in turn could cause turmoil to domestic social and financial stability.

Regulatory State Building under Authoritarianism: Bureaucratic Competition, Global Embeddedness, and Regulatory Authority in China

Food Safety Regulatory Enforcement in China: A Data-Driven Approach

Authoritarian but Responsive: Local Regulation of Industrial Energy Efficiency in Jiangsu, China

The limits to the internationalisation of regulation: divergent enforcement strategies in China’s food safety regulation

Aspiring to State Authority: The Autonomy of Arbitration Institutions in China

Regulatory Uncertainty and Corporate Responses to Environmental Protection in China

Bureaucratic Control and Strategic Compliance: How Do Subnational Governments Implement Central Guidelines in China?

Agility Over Stability: China’s Great Reversal in Regulating the Platform Economy

Superior Endorsement and Bureaucratic Compliance in China’s Environmental Enforcement

Securing Authoritarian Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Political Economy of Surveillance in China

Corporate Social Responsibility Under Authoritarian Capitalism: Dynamics and Prospects of State-Led and Society-Driven CSR

On Authoritativeness of Legal System

Centralization and regulatory enforcement: Evidence from personnel authority reform in China

China As a Regulatory State

Title China as a regulatory state

When Authoritarianism Responds: Conditional Government Responsiveness in China's Environmental Conflicts

The system of legal regulation of state control in the People’s Republic of China

IS THE CSRC PROTECTING A “LEVEL PLAYING FIELD” IN CHINA'S CAPITAL MARKETS: PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT, FRAGMENTED AUTHORITARIANISM AND CORPORATISM

Is the CSRC Protecting a 'Level Playing Field' in China's Capital Markets: Public Enforcement, Fragmented Authoritarianism and Corporatism

Selective enforcement of regulation

Bridging Critical Institutionalism and Fragmented Authoritarianism in China: an Analysis of Centralized Water Policies and Their Local Implementation in Semi‐arid Irrigation Districts