Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of illegal insider trading enforcement in China by focusing, among other things, on the Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) enforcement actions in the period 1993‐2006. Design/methodology/approach This paper discusses the CSRC's enforcement policies and practices of insider trading regulation, based upon administrative and judicial cases, face‐to‐face interviews with regulators, and policy documents. Findings A major finding of the study is the paucity of insider trading cases and the lack of convictions for insider trading offences in China. The campaign against securities offences did not actually come with the stricter enforcement of insider trading laws. A primary challenge in the insider trading regulation comes from the fact that most insider trading cases involve high‐ranking government and party officials. The CSRC lacks the power to directly administer discipline and penalties on government officials and party cadres for insider trading offences. Research limitations/implications It is recommended that the CSRC be given more power, more resources and more trained regulators to detect and address insider trading activities. It is also recommended that the CSRC improve its surveillance capabilities by fully utilizing sophisticated computer surveillance software systems, by improving inter‐agency and inter‐market information‐sharing, and by cooperating with other countries' regulators and participating in the ISG's database to detect possible international insider trading. Originality/value The paper will be of interest to researchers in the field of financial crime and securities regulation. Regulators, the private sector and government departments will also benefit from an analysis of Chinese insider trading enforcement cases. This paper also suggests better strategies for dealing with insider trading offences in China. A fair and orderly market is crucial for investors in the Chinese market.

IS THE CSRC PROTECTING A “LEVEL PLAYING FIELD” IN CHINA'S CAPITAL MARKETS: PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT, FRAGMENTED AUTHORITARIANISM AND CORPORATISM

Is the CSRC Protecting a 'Level Playing Field' in China's Capital Markets: Public Enforcement, Fragmented Authoritarianism and Corporatism

The Level of Decentralization and Property Rights Protection––a Sociological Analysis of Property Rights

MARKET COMPETITION,MANAGER INCENTIVE,AND FRAUD BEHAVIOR OF LISTED COMPANIES——EVIDENCE FROM PUNISHMENT BULLETINS BY CSRC

Selective enforcement of regulation

Public enforcement in China’s securities markets: is it a “law matter”?

Government Regulation,Enforcement,and Economic Consequences in a Transition Economy:Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies Implementing the Split Share Structure Reform

Insider trading in China: the case for the Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission

Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China

Law Environment, Government Regulation and Implicit Contract: Empirical Evidence from the Scandals of China’s Listed Companies

Government Protection and Corporate Risk Management in China

Title China as a regulatory state

The effectiveness of judicial and public enforcement of regulation on related-party transaction in China

Sharpened " Real Teeth " of China's Securities Regulatory Agency: Evidence from CEO Turnover

The Regulation of the Financing of Stock Markets,and the Optimal Capital Structure of Companies

Corporate Governance in China: Current Practices, Economic Effects and Institutional Determinants

Corporate Social Responsibility Under Authoritarian Capitalism: Dynamics and Prospects of State-Led and Society-Driven CSR

Equity Financing Regulation and the Optimal Capital Structure: Evidence from China

Fragmented State Capitalism: Firm-Level Evidence from China

Is Corporate Social Responsibility Used To Mask Corporate Speculation? Evidence From Emerging China

Securities Regulation and Implicit Penalties