Abstract:While corporate governance continues to play an important role in economic development, corporate governance issues are more complex in transition economies than in the developed market economies. Consequently, policy makers in transition economies have been busy attempting to establish a sound corporate governance system in their countries. This study uses China as a laboratory to explore corporate governance issues, as China is not only the most populous economy in the world, it is also undergoing transition from a socialist to a market economy since 1978. The need for strengthening corporate governance in the country has become all the more pressing as rapid economic growth has transformed the economy since especially the 1990s. China experienced a watershed in corporate governance when the split-share structure reform was introduced. Hence, we analyse in this thesis the impact of this reform on board composition, firm performance, and firm risk over the period before and after the introduction of the reform. Firms are classified by ownership into central government, local government, state owned enterprise (SOE) and privately controlled firms based on ultimate controlling shareholders. The study deploys static and dynamic panel data estimation methods to examine the determinants of corporate board composition, relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance, and the relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and firm risk. The results show that Chinese corporate board composition is jointly determined by the scope of operation (resource dependent theory), monitoring (agency theory), bargaining (power theory), other governance mechanisms (stakeholder theory) and regulations (institution theory). The government was the most important player in constituting board composition before the split-share structure reform was introduced, but independent directors became more important than other governance mechanisms after that. Private firms and SOEs are more concerned about cost than other factors when adding independent directors. Also, corporate board exerts a positive influence on firm performance once the share of independent directors reached 30 percent. Although the supervisory board can make up for the inadequate number of independent directors, its role became insignificant after the reform. Central government controlled firms show outstanding accounting and market performance. While increasing corporate board size reduced firm risk, its independence increased firm risk. State ownership and ownership concentration increased firm risk after reforms. Overall, the findings confirm the applicability of corporate governance theories to China. Other transition economies can draw lessons from the institutional change that have played a significant role in the evolving Chinese corporate governance system. Government-controlled firms should be more market-oriented so as to reduce the unnecessary influence of political power on firms activities. It also sheds light on the partial privatization approach that may work for other transition economies.

Title China as a regulatory state

China As a Regulatory State

The Role of the State in Resolving Business Disputes in China

Whether tough environmental regulatory measures can play a dominant role? Evidence from private enterprises in China

Selective enforcement of regulation

Deregulation As a Source of China’s Economic Growth

Corporate Governance, Firm Performance and Chinese State Enterprise Reform / Zhang Cheng

Government's green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China

A Model of China's State Capitalism

Government Regulation,Marketization and Market Share of Private Companies

IS THE CSRC PROTECTING A “LEVEL PLAYING FIELD” IN CHINA'S CAPITAL MARKETS: PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT, FRAGMENTED AUTHORITARIANISM AND CORPORATISM

Do Deep Pockets Have More Political Influence?—the Size of Private Enterprises and Their Strategy Selection in Resolving Administrative Disputes

Do State-Owned Enterprises Have Worse Corporate Governance? An Empirical Study of Corporate Practices in China

Corporate environmental responsibility in China: a strategic political perspective

Is the CSRC Protecting a 'Level Playing Field' in China's Capital Markets: Public Enforcement, Fragmented Authoritarianism and Corporatism

Corporate Governance in China: Current Practices, Economic Effects and Institutional Determinants

Governing the Chinese Economy: Regulatory Reform in the Service of the State

Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China

An Empirical Study on Private Benefits of Control in China's Listed Companies

Regulatory Uncertainty and Corporate Responses to Environmental Protection in China

Invisible economy, performance assessment of local governments, and environmental regulation in China