The experimental research for reducing the minimum miscibility pressure of carbon dioxide miscible flooding

Yuejun Zhao,Guangjuan Fan,Kaoping Song,Yilin Li,Hao Chen,He Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111091
IF: 16.799
2021-07-01
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Abstract:<p>As the minimum miscibility pressure in the research area is higher than the formation fracture pressure, it is impossible to form the miscible flooding. To address this problem, the effect of two chemical reagents (citric acid isobutyl ester, citric acid isopentyl ester) on reducing the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of carbon dioxide and the crude oil was determined through the long slim tube displacement experiment. The experimental results show that the minimum miscibility pressure could decrease significantly with increasing the injected slug size of the chemical reagents, but the decrease became smaller and smaller. The chemical reagents had an optimal injected slug size of 0.003 PV (pore volume). At such slug size, the minimum miscibility pressure for citric acid isobutyl ester was reduced by 6.1 MPa and for citric acid isopentyl ester the reduction was 5.5 MPa. The minimum miscibility pressure was reduced by 20.61% and 18.58%. The addition of citric acid isobutyl ester slug could greatly reduce the minimum miscibility pressure, with a better effect. The recovery of the miscible flooding experiment scheme after injection of citric acid isobutyl ester slug was higher by 6.5%–11.6% than that of the scheme without citric acid isobutyl ester injection. Therefore, the citric acid isobutyl ester was recommended as the best chemical reagent to reduce the minimum miscibility pressure. The research results are of certain guiding significance for the overall realization of miscible flooding to enhance oil recovery in the research area.</p>
energy & fuels,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the issue where CO2 miscible flooding technology cannot be implemented in certain oilfield blocks. Specifically, the minimum miscible pressure (MMP) in the study area is higher than the formation fracture pressure, making it impossible to achieve miscible flooding in these blocks. To tackle this challenge, researchers conducted slim tube displacement experiments to investigate the effects of two chemical agents (isobutyl citrate and isoamyl citrate) on reducing the minimum miscible pressure between CO2 and crude oil. The experimental results showed that as the injection amount of the chemical agents increased, the minimum miscible pressure significantly decreased, but this decreasing trend gradually weakened. The optimal injection amount for isobutyl citrate and isoamyl citrate was 0.003 pore volume (PV), at which the minimum miscible pressure decreased by 6.1 MPa and 5.5 MPa, respectively, reducing by 20.61% and 18.58%. Additionally, after injecting isobutyl citrate, the recovery rate of the miscible flooding experiment scheme increased by 6.5% to 11.6% compared to the scheme without isobutyl citrate injection. Therefore, isobutyl citrate is recommended as the optimal chemical agent for reducing the minimum miscible pressure. This study provides guidance for achieving comprehensive miscible flooding in the study area to significantly enhance oil recovery.