Abstract:Abstract Background Structural variations (SVs) have been reported to play an important role in genetic diversity and trait regulation. Many computer algorithms detecting SVs have recently been developed, but the use of multiple algorithms to detect high-confidence SVs has not been studied. The most suitable sequencing depth for detecting SVs in pear is also not known. Results In this study, a pipeline to detect SVs using next-generation and long-read sequencing data was constructed. The performances of seven types of SV detection software using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and two types of software using long-read sequencing data (SVIM and Sniffles), which are based on different algorithms, were compared. Of the nine software packages evaluated, SVIM identified the most SVs, and Sniffles detected SVs with the highest accuracy (> 90%). When the results from multiple SV detection tools were combined, the SVs identified by both MetaSV and IMR/DENOM, which use NGS data, were more accurate than those identified by both SVIM and Sniffles, with mean accuracies of 98.7 and 96.5%, respectively. The software packages using long-read sequencing data required fewer CPU cores and less memory and ran faster than those using NGS data. In addition, according to the performances of assembly-based algorithms using NGS data, we found that a sequencing depth of 50× is appropriate for detecting SVs in the pear genome. Conclusion This study provides strong evidence that more than one SV detection software package, each based on a different algorithm, should be used to detect SVs with higher confidence, and that long-read sequencing data are better than NGS data for SV detection. The SV detection pipeline that we have established will facilitate the study of diversity in other crops.

Comparison of structural variants detected by PacBio-CLR and ONT sequencing in pear

Additional File 3 of Comparison of Structural Variants Detected by PacBio-CLR and ONT Sequencing in Pear

Comparison of Multiple Algorithms to Reliably Detect Structural Variants in Pears

Cataloguing Plant Genome Structural Variations

Structural variation discovery in wheat using PacBio high-fidelity sequencing

Comprehensive and deep evaluation of structural variation detection pipelines with third-generation sequencing data

Evaluating Structural Variation Detection Tools for Long-Read Sequencing Datasets in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

SVLR: Genome Structure Variant Detection Using Long Read Sequencing Data

Comparison of the Two Up-to-date Sequencing Technologies for Genome Assembly: HiFi Reads of Pacific Biosciences Sequel II System and Ultralong Reads of Oxford Nanopore

SVsearcher: A More Accurate Structural Variation Detection Method in Long Read Data.

Structural Variation Detection Algorithm in High-throughput Sequencing Data

A Comparison of Structural Variant Calling from Short-Read and Nanopore-Based Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Optical Genome Mapping as a Benchmark

Multi-platform Discovery of Haplotype-Resolved Structural Variation in Human Genomes

Tradeoffs in alignment and assembly-based methods for structural variant detection with long-read sequencing data

SVSR: A Program to Simulate Structural Variations and Generate Sequencing Reads for Multiple Platforms

Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV

Overview of structural variation calling: Simulation, identification, and visualization

Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Variant Genotyping Methods Based on Long-Read Sequencing Data.

Hidden Biases in Germline Structural Variant Detection.

Detecting A Portion of Structural Variation of Hedou12 by Using Some Characteristics of the Next Sequencing Technology

FocalSV: target region-based structural variant assembly and refinement using single-molecule long read sequencing data