A new stepwise synthesis of an octapeptide corresponding to a sequence around the "reactive" serine of chymotrypsin.

D. A. Laufer,E. Blout

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/JA00981A034

IF: 15

1967-03-01

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Variant Genotyping Methods Based on Long-Read Sequencing Data.

Duan Xiaoke,Pan Mingpei,Fan Shaohua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08548-y

IF: 4.547

2022-01-01

BMC Genomics

Abstract:Background Structural variants (SVs) play a crucial role in gene regulation, trait association, and disease in humans. SV genotyping has been extensively applied in genomics research and clinical diagnosis. Although a growing number of SV genotyping methods for long reads have been developed, a comprehensive performance assessment of these methods has yet to be done. Results Based on one simulated and three real SV datasets, we performed an in-depth evaluation of five SV genotyping methods, including cuteSV, LRcaller, Sniffles, SVJedi, and VaPoR. The results show that for insertions and deletions, cuteSV and LRcaller have similar F1 scores (cuteSV, insertions: 0.69–0.90, deletions: 0.77–0.90 and LRcaller, insertions: 0.67–0.87, deletions: 0.74–0.91) and are superior to other methods. For duplications, inversions, and translocations, LRcaller yields the most accurate genotyping results (0.84, 0.68, and 0.47, respectively). When genotyping SVs located in tandem repeat region or with imprecise breakpoints, cuteSV (insertions and deletions) and LRcaller (duplications, inversions, and translocations) are better than other methods. In addition, we observed a decrease in F1 scores when the SV size increased. Finally, our analyses suggest that the F1 scores of these methods reach the point of diminishing returns at 20× depth of coverage. Conclusions We present an in-depth benchmark study of long-read SV genotyping methods. Our results highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each genotyping method, which provide practical guidance for optimal application selection and prospective directions for tool improvement.
Benchmarking long-read aligners and SV callers for structural variation detection in Oxford nanopore sequencing data

Asmaa A. Helal,Bishoy T. Saad,Mina T. Saad,Gamal S. Mosaad,Khaled M. Aboshanab

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56604-2

IF: 4.6

2024-03-15

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Structural variants (SVs) are one of the significant types of DNA mutations and are typically defined as larger-than-50-bp genomic alterations that include insertions, deletions, duplications, inversions, and translocations. These modifications can profoundly impact the phenotypic characteristics and contribute to disorders like cancer, response to treatment, and infections. Four long-read aligners and five SV callers have been evaluated using three Oxford Nanopore NGS human genome datasets in terms of precision, recall, and F1-score statistical metrics, depth of coverage, and speed of analysis. The best SV caller regarding recall, precision, and F1-score when matched with different aligners at different coverage levels tend to vary depending on the dataset and the specific SV types being analyzed. However, based on our findings, Sniffles and CuteSV tend to perform well across different aligners and coverage levels, followed by SVIM, PBSV, and SVDSS in the last place. The CuteSV caller has the highest average F1-score (82.51%) and recall (78.50%), and Sniffles has the highest average precision value (94.33%). Minimap2 as an aligner and Sniffles as an SV caller act as a strong base for the pipeline of SV calling because of their high speed and reasonable accomplishment. PBSV has a lower average F1-score, precision, and recall and may generate more false positives and overlook some actual SVs. Our results are valuable in the comprehensive evaluation of popular SV callers and aligners as they provide insight into the performance of several long-read aligners and SV callers and serve as a reference for researchers in selecting the most suitable tools for SV detection.

multidisciplinary sciences
Evaluation of 10 Different Pipelines for Bacterial Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection

Zi-Hao Hu,Ying Wang,Long Yang,Qing-Yi Cao,Ming Ling,Xiao-Hua Meng,Yao Chen,Shu-Jun Ni,Zhi Chen,Cheng-Zhi Liu,Kun-Kai Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/im9.0000000000000134

2023-01-01

Infectious Microbes & Diseases

Abstract:Bacterial genome sequencing is a powerful technique for studying the genetic diversity and evolution of microbial populations. However, the detection of genomic variants from sequencing data is challenging due to the presence of contamination, sequencing errors and multiple strains within the same species. Several bioinformatics tools have been developed to address these issues, but their performance and accuracy have not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we compared 10 variant detection pipelines using 18 simulated and 17 real datasets of high-throughput sequences from a bundle of representative bacteria. We assessed the sensitivity of each pipeline under different conditions of coverage, simulation and strain diversity. We also demonstrated the application of these tools to identify consistent mutations in a 30-time repeated sequencing dataset of Staphylococcus hominis . We found that HaplotypeCaller, but not Mutect2, from the GATK tool set showed the best performance in terms of accuracy and robustness. CFSAN and Snippy performed not as well in several simulated and real sequencing datasets. Our results provided a comprehensive benchmark and guidance for choosing the optimal variant detection pipeline for high-throughput bacterial genome sequencing data.
Tradeoffs in alignment and assembly-based methods for structural variant detection with long-read sequencing data

Yichen Henry Liu,Can Luo,Staunton G. Golding,Jacob B. Ioffe,Xin Maizie Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46614-z

IF: 16.6

2024-03-19

Nature Communications

Abstract:Abstract Long-read sequencing offers long contiguous DNA fragments, facilitating diploid genome assembly and structural variant (SV) detection. Efficient and robust algorithms for SV identification are crucial with increasing data availability. Alignment-based methods, favored for their computational efficiency and lower coverage requirements, are prominent. Alternative approaches, relying solely on available reads for de novo genome assembly and employing assembly-based tools for SV detection via comparison to a reference genome, demand significantly more computational resources. However, the lack of comprehensive benchmarking constrains our comprehension and hampers further algorithm development. Here we systematically compare 14 read alignment-based SV calling methods (including 4 deep learning-based methods and 1 hybrid method), and 4 assembly-based SV calling methods, alongside 4 upstream aligners and 7 assemblers. Assembly-based tools excel in detecting large SVs, especially insertions, and exhibit robustness to evaluation parameter changes and coverage fluctuations. Conversely, alignment-based tools demonstrate superior genotyping accuracy at low sequencing coverage (5-10×) and excel in detecting complex SVs, like translocations, inversions, and duplications. Our evaluation provides performance insights, highlighting the absence of a universally superior tool. We furnish guidelines across 31 criteria combinations, aiding users in selecting the most suitable tools for diverse scenarios and offering directions for further method development.

multidisciplinary sciences
Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software

Daniel L. Cameron,Leon Di Stefano,Anthony T. Papenfuss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11146-4

IF: 16.6

2019-07-19

Nature Communications

Abstract:In recent years, many software packages for identifying structural variants (SVs) using whole-genome sequencing data have been released. When published, a new method is commonly compared with those already available, but this tends to be selective and incomplete. The lack of comprehensive benchmarking of methods presents challenges for users in selecting methods and for developers in understanding algorithm behaviours and limitations. Here we report the comprehensive evaluation of 10 SV callers, selected following a rigorous process and spanning the breadth of detection approaches, using high-quality reference cell lines, as well as simulations. Due to the nature of available truth sets, our focus is on general-purpose rather than somatic callers. We characterise the impact on performance of event size and type, sequencing characteristics, and genomic context, and analyse the efficacy of ensemble calling and calibration of variant quality scores. Finally, we provide recommendations for both users and methods developers.

multidisciplinary sciences
SVmine Improves Structural Variation Detection by Integrative Mining of Predictions from Multiple Algorithms

Yuchao Xia,Yun Liu,Minghua Deng,Ruibin Xi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx455

IF: 5.8

2017-01-01

Bioinformatics

Abstract:Motivation: Structural variation (SV) is an important class of genomic variations in human genomes. A number of SV detection algorithms based on high-throughput sequencing data have been developed, but they have various and often limited level of sensitivity, specificity and breakpoint resolution. Furthermore, since overlaps between predictions of algorithms are low, SV detection based on multiple algorithms, an often-used strategy in real applications, has little effect in improving the performance of SV detection. Results: We develop a computational tool called SVmine for further mining of SV predictions from multiple tools to improve the performance of SV detection. SVmine refines SV predictions by performing local realignment and assess quality of SV predictions based on likelihoods of the realignments. The local realignment is performed against a set of sequences constructed from the reference sequence near the candidate SV by incorporating nearby single nucleotide variations, insertions and deletions. A sandwich alignment algorithm is further used to improve the accuracy of breakpoint positions. We evaluate SVmine on a set of simulated data and real data and find that SVmine has superior sensitivity, specificity and breakpoint estimation accuracy. We also find that SVmine can significantly improve overlaps of SV predictions from other algorithms.
A powerful random forest-based pipeline for accurately identifying the structural variants on panel sequencing data.

Guiwu Zhuang,Yu-Long Chen,Hongzhen Tang,Wei Wang,Peng Wang,Edmond Gao,Shencun Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.e18898

IF: 45.3

2023-06-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:e18898 Background: Numerous studies have reported that the identification of structural variants (SVs) can provide ideal targets for cancer targeting therapy. However, on the one hand, the current algorithms exhibited different performances in detecting different types and sizes of SVs; on the other hand, the whole-genome/exome sequencing for detecting SVs is costly, and only a portion of SVs can be used to guide the clinical treatment of cancer patients. Therefore, developing a powerful, highly accurate, and cost-effective pipeline to detect SVs for clinical application is urgently required. Methods: Based on simulated sequencing data, four common SV detection tools (Delly, Lumpy, SvABA, and Manta) were used to select the best performance one. This tool will be used for detecting SVs in panel sequencing data. Then, Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) was used to annotate these SVs as true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) SVs. These annotated TP and FP SVs were used as input in the random forest classifier (RFC) to train a model for predicting the true or false positive SVs. Two independent testing cohorts and standards were used to validate this constructed pipeline. In addition, IHC/FISH experiments were performed to further validate these predicted TP SVs. Results: In the simulation data, the detection tool with the highest SVs identification sensitivity was Delly. By Delly, a total of 1,303 SVs in 384 tumor samples were detected. Based on annotated TP and FP SVs, an RFC model was constructed in the training cohort, which predicted 334 and 560 TP and FP SVs, respectively. The accuracy rates (AR) were 99.85% and 100% of TP and FP SVs, respectively. The predicted TP and FP SVs by constructed pipeline also showed a high accuracy rate in cohort 1 (98.96% and 99.24% of TP and FP SVs, respectively), cohort 2 (98.48% and 100% of TP and FP SVs, respectively), and standards (the mean accuracy rate was 90%). Finally, based on these TP SVs predicted by the constructed pipeline, FISH/IHC experiment results further verified the robustness of this pipeline (the man accuracy rate was 95.83%). Conclusions: The constructed random forest-based pipeline can robustly and accurately identify SVs based on panel sequencing data, which will be helpful for clinical decision-making.

oncology
Overview of structural variation calling: Simulation, identification, and visualization

Yu Lei,Yue Meng,Xinqi Guo,Ke Ning,Yixin Bian,Lanlan Li,Zhenduo Hu,Anastasia A Anashkina,Qinghua Jiang,Yucui Dong,Xiao Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105534

Abstract:Structural variation (SV) is a vital part of biological genetic diversity. The simulation and identification with high efficiency and accuracy are considered to be very important. With the continuous development and wide application of various technologies, computer simulation of genomic data has attracted wide attention due to its intuitive and convenient advantages. Meanwhile, there are several high-quality methods used for structural variation identification based on second-generation (short-read) and third-generation (long-read) data. These methods utilize various strategies and compatible aligners and exhibit specific characteristics. In addition, genomic visualization tools use graphical interfaces to visualize the data, which are convenient for data observation, validation, and even for the manual curation of several questionable data. The present study summarized the methods of simulation, identification, and visualization tools for structural variation in the context of sequencing technology development. Overall, this review aimed to offer a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of SV.
Hidden Biases in Germline Structural Variant Detection.

Michael M. Khayat,Sayed Mohammad Ebrahim Sahraeian,Samantha Zarate,Andrew Carroll,Huixiao Hong,Bohu Pan,Leming Shi,Richard A. Gibbs,Marghoob Mohiyuddin,Yuanting Zheng,Fritz J. Sedlazeck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02558-x

IF: 17.906

2021-01-01

Genome Biology

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Genomic structural variations (SV) are important determinants of genotypic and phenotypic changes in many organisms. However, the detection of SV from next-generation sequencing data remains challenging.RESULTS:In this study, DNA from a Chinese family quartet is sequenced at three different sequencing centers in triplicate. A total of 288 derivative data sets are generated utilizing different analysis pipelines and compared to identify sources of analytical variability. Mapping methods provide the major contribution to variability, followed by sequencing centers and replicates. Interestingly, SV supported by only one center or replicate often represent true positives with 47.02% and 45.44% overlapping the long-read SV call set, respectively. This is consistent with an overall higher false negative rate for SV calling in centers and replicates compared to mappers (15.72%). Finally, we observe that the SV calling variability also persists in a genotyping approach, indicating the impact of the underlying sequencing and preparation approaches.CONCLUSIONS:This study provides the first detailed insights into the sources of variability in SV identification from next-generation sequencing and highlights remaining challenges in SV calling for large cohorts. We further give recommendations on how to reduce SV calling variability and the choice of alignment methodology.
Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV

Tao Jiang,Yongzhuang Liu,Yue Jiang,Junyi Li,Yan Gao,Zhe Cui,Yadong Liu,Bo Liu,Yadong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02107-y

IF: 17.906

2020-08-03

Genome Biology

Abstract:Abstract Long-read sequencing is promising for the comprehensive discovery of structural variations (SVs). However, it is still non-trivial to achieve high yields and performance simultaneously due to the complex SV signatures implied by noisy long reads. We propose cuteSV, a sensitive, fast, and scalable long-read-based SV detection approach. cuteSV uses tailored methods to collect the signatures of various types of SVs and employs a clustering-and-refinement method to implement sensitive SV detection. Benchmarks on simulated and real long-read sequencing datasets demonstrate that cuteSV has higher yields and scaling performance than state-of-the-art tools. cuteSV is available at https://github.com/tjiangHIT/cuteSV .

genetics & heredity,biotechnology & applied microbiology
ProcaryaSV: structural variation detection pipeline for bacterial genomes using short-read sequencing

Robin Jugas,Helena Vitkova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05843-1

IF: 3.307

2024-07-09

BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract:Background: Structural variations play an important role in bacterial genomes. They can mediate genome adaptation quickly in response to the external environment and thus can also play a role in antibiotic resistance. The detection of structural variations in bacteria is challenging, and the recognition of even small rearrangements can be important. Even though most detection tools are aimed at and benchmarked on eukaryotic genomes, they can also be used on prokaryotic genomes. The key features of detection are the ability to detect small rearrangements and support haploid genomes. Because of the limiting performance of a single detection tool, combining the detection abilities of multiple tools can lead to more robust results. There are already available workflows for structural variation detection for long-reads technologies and for the detection of single-nucleotide variation and indels, both aimed at bacteria. Yet we are unaware of structural variations detection workflows for the short-reads sequencing platform. Motivated by this gap we created our workflow. Further, we were interested in increasing the detection performance and providing more robust results. Results: We developed an open-source bioinformatics pipeline, ProcaryaSV, for the detection of structural variations in bacterial isolates from paired-end short sequencing reads. Multiple tools, starting with quality control and trimming of sequencing data, alignment to the reference genome, and multiple structural variation detection tools, are integrated. All the partial results are then processed and merged with an in-house merging algorithm. Compared with a single detection approach, ProcaryaSV has improved detection performance and is a reproducible easy-to-use tool. Conclusions: The ProcaryaSV pipeline provides an integrative approach to structural variation detection from paired-end next-generation sequencing of bacterial samples. It can be easily installed and used on Linux machines. It is publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/robinjugas/ProcaryaSV .
A Comparison of Structural Variant Calling from Short-Read and Nanopore-Based Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Optical Genome Mapping as a Benchmark

Yang Pei,Melanie Tanguy,Adam Giess,Abhijit Dixit,Louise C Wilson,Richard J Gibbons,Stephen R F Twigg,Greg Elgar,Andrew O M Wilkie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070925

2024-07-16

Abstract:The identification of structural variants (SVs) in genomic data represents an ongoing challenge because of difficulties in reliable SV calling leading to reduced sensitivity and specificity. We prepared high-quality DNA from 9 parent-child trios, who had previously undergone short-read whole-genome sequencing (Illumina platform) as part of the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project. We reanalysed the genomes using both Bionano optical genome mapping (OGM; 8 probands and one trio) and Nanopore long-read sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] platform; all samples). To establish a "truth" dataset, we asked whether rare proband SV calls (n = 234) made by the Bionano Access (version 1.6.1)/Solve software (version 3.6.1_11162020) could be verified by individual visualisation using the Integrative Genomics Viewer with either or both of the Illumina and ONT raw sequence. Of these, 222 calls were verified, indicating that Bionano OGM calls have high precision (positive predictive value 95%). We then asked what proportion of the 222 true Bionano SVs had been identified by SV callers in the other two datasets. In the Illumina dataset, sensitivity varied according to variant type, being high for deletions (115/134; 86%) but poor for insertions (13/58; 22%). In the ONT dataset, sensitivity was generally poor using the original Sniffles variant caller (48% overall) but improved substantially with use of Sniffles2 (36/40; 90% and 17/23; 74% for deletions and insertions, respectively). In summary, we show that the precision of OGM is very high. In addition, when applying the Sniffles2 caller, the sensitivity of SV calling using ONT long-read sequence data outperforms Illumina sequencing for most SV types.
SVDF: enhancing structural variation detect from long-read sequencing via automatic filtering strategies

Heng Hu,Runtian Gao,Wentao Gao,Bo Gao,Zhongjun Jiang,Murong Zhou,Guohua Wang,Tao Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae336

2024-05-23

Abstract:Structural variation (SV) is an important form of genomic variation that influences gene function and expression by altering the structure of the genome. Although long-read data have been proven to better characterize SVs, SVs detected from noisy long-read data still include a considerable portion of false-positive calls. To accurately detect SVs in long-read data, we present SVDF, a method that employs a learning-based noise filtering strategy and an SV signature-adaptive clustering algorithm, for effectively reducing the likelihood of false-positive events. Benchmarking results from multiple orthogonal experiments demonstrate that, across different sequencing platforms and depths, SVDF achieves higher calling accuracy for each sample compared to several existing general SV calling tools. We believe that, with its meticulous and sensitive SV detection capability, SVDF can bring new opportunities and advancements to cutting-edge genomic research.
SVision: a deep learning approach to resolve complex structural variants

Jiadong Lin,Songbo Wang,Peter A. Audano,Deyu Meng,Jacob I. Flores,Walter Kosters,Xiaofei Yang,Peng Jia,Tobias Marschall,Christine R. Beck,Kai Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01609-w

IF: 48

2022-09-17

Nature Methods

Abstract:Complex structural variants (CSVs) encompass multiple breakpoints and are often missed or misinterpreted. We developed SVision, a deep-learning-based multi-object-recognition framework, to automatically detect and haracterize CSVs from long-read sequencing data. SVision outperforms current callers at identifying the internal structure of complex events and has revealed 80 high-quality CSVs with 25 distinct structures from an individual genome. SVision directly detects CSVs without matching known structures, allowing sensitive detection of both common and previously uncharacterized complex rearrangements.

biochemical research methods
Comprehensive assessment of long-read sequencing platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variation

Na Yuan,Peilin Jia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae441

2024-07-25

Abstract:Copy number variations (CNVs) play pivotal roles in disease susceptibility and have been intensively investigated in human disease studies. Long-read sequencing technologies offer opportunities for comprehensive structural variation (SV) detection, and numerous methodologies have been developed recently. Consequently, there is a pressing need to assess these methods and aid researchers in selecting appropriate techniques for CNV detection using long-read sequencing. Hence, we conducted an evaluation of eight CNV calling methods across 22 datasets from nine publicly available samples and 15 simulated datasets, covering multiple sequencing platforms. The overall performance of CNV callers varied substantially and was influenced by the input dataset type, sequencing depth, and CNV type, among others. Specifically, the PacBio CCS sequencing platform outperformed PacBio CLR and Nanopore platforms regarding CNV detection recall rates. A sequencing depth of 10x demonstrated the capability to identify 85% of the CNVs detected in a 50x dataset. Moreover, deletions were more generally detectable than duplications. Among the eight benchmarked methods, cuteSV, Delly, pbsv, and Sniffles2 demonstrated superior accuracy, while SVIM exhibited high recall rates.
Comprehensive Assessment of Isoform Detection Methods for Third-Generation Sequencing Data

Yaqi Su,Zhejian Yu,Si-Qian Jin,Zhipeng Ai,Ruihong Yuan,Xinyi Chen,Ziwei Xue,Yixin Guo,Di Chen,Hongqing Liang,Zuozhu Liu,Wanlu Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.03.551905

2023-01-01

Abstract:Abstract The advancement of Third-Generation Sequencing (TGS) techniques has significantly increased the length of sequencing to several kilobases, thereby facilitating the identification of alternative splicing (AS) events and isoform expressions. Recently, numerous computational methods for isoform detection using long-read sequencing data have been developed. However, there is lack of prior comparative studies that systemically evaluates the performance of these software tools, implemented with different algorithms, under various simulations that encompass potential influencing factors. In this study, we conducted a benchmarking analysis of eleven methods implemented in eight computational tools capable of identifying isoform structures from TGS RNA sequencing data. We evaluated their performances using simulated data, which represented diverse sequencing platforms generated by an in-house simulator, as well as experimental data. Our comprehensive results demonstrate the guided mode of StringTie2 and Bambu achieved the best performance in sensitivity and precision, respectively. This study provides valuable guidance for future research on AS analysis and the ongoing improvement of tools for isoform detection using TGS data.
Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data

Soobok Joe,Jong-Lyul Park,Jun Kim,Sangok Kim,Ji-Hwan Park,Min-Kyung Yeo,Dongyoon Lee,Jin Ok Yang,Seon-Young Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10239-9

IF: 4.547

2024-03-29

BMC Genomics

Abstract:Detecting structural variations (SVs) at the population level using next-generation sequencing (NGS) requires substantial computational resources and processing time. Here, we compared the performances of 11 SV callers: Delly, Manta, GridSS, Wham, Sniffles, Lumpy, SvABA, Canvas, CNVnator, MELT, and INSurVeyor. These SV callers have been recently published and have been widely employed for processing massive whole-genome sequencing datasets. We evaluated the accuracy, sequence depth, running time, and memory usage of the SV callers.

genetics & heredity,biotechnology & applied microbiology
SVvalidation: A long-read-based validation method for genomic structural variation

Yan Zheng,Xuequn Shang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291741

IF: 3.7

2024-01-05

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Although various methods have been developed to detect structural variations (SVs) in genomic sequences, few are used to validate these results. Several commonly used SV callers produce many false positive SVs, and existing validation methods are not accurate enough. Therefore, a highly efficient and accurate validation method is essential. In response, we propose SVvalidation—a new method that uses long-read sequencing data for validating SVs with higher accuracy and efficiency. Compared to existing methods, SVvalidation performs better in validating SVs in repeat regions and can determine the homozygosity or heterozygosity of an SV. Additionally, SVvalidation offers the highest recall, precision, and F1-score (improving by 7-16%) across all datasets. Moreover, SVvalidation is suitable for different types of SVs. The program is available at https://github.com/nwpuzhengyan/SVvalidation .

multidisciplinary sciences
Systematic Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection Methods from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Fenglin Liu,Yuanyuan Zhang,Lei Zhang,Ziyi Li,Qiao Fang,Ranran Gao,Zemin Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1863-4

2019-01-01

Abstract:BackgroundSystematic interrogation of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) is one of the most promising approaches to delineate the cellular heterogeneity and phylogenetic relationships at the single-cell level. While SNV detection from abundant single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is applicable and cost-effective in identifying expressed variants, inferring sub-clones, and deciphering genotype-phenotype linkages, there is a lack of computational methods specifically developed for SNV calling in scRNA-seq. Although variant callers for bulk RNA-seq have been sporadically used in scRNA-seq, the performances of different tools have not been assessed.ResultsHere, we perform a systematic comparison of seven tools including SAMtools, the GATK pipeline, CTAT, FreeBayes, MuTect2, Strelka2, and VarScan2, using both simulation and scRNA-seq datasets, and identify multiple elements influencing their performance. While the specificities are generally high, with sensitivities exceeding 90% for most tools when calling homozygous SNVs in high-confident coding regions with sufficient read depths, such sensitivities dramatically decrease when calling SNVs with low read depths, low variant allele frequencies, or in specific genomic contexts. SAMtools shows the highest sensitivity in most cases especially with low supporting reads, despite the relatively low specificity in introns or high-identity regions. Strelka2 shows consistently good performance when sufficient supporting reads are provided, while FreeBayes shows good performance in the cases of high variant allele frequencies.ConclusionsWe recommend SAMtools, Strelka2, FreeBayes, or CTAT, depending on the specific conditions of usage. Our study provides the first benchmarking to evaluate the performances of different SNV detection tools for scRNA-seq data.
ConsensuSV-ONT - a modern method for accurate structural variant calling

Antoni Pietryga,Mateusz Chiliński,Sachin Gadakh,Dariusz Plewczynski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.26.605267

2024-07-26

Abstract:The improvements in sequencing technology make the development of new tools for the detection of structural variance more and more common. However, the tools available for the long-read Oxford Nanopore sequencing are limited, and it is hard to choose one, which is the best. That is why there is a need to create a tool based on consensus that combines existing work in order to discover a set of high-quality, reliable structural variants that can be used for further downstream analysis. The field has also been subject to revolution in machine learning techniques, especially deep learning. In the spirit of the aforementioned need and developments, we propose a novel, fully automated ConsensuSV-ONT algorithm. The method uses six independent, state-of-the-art structural variant callers for long-read sequencing along with a convolutional neural network for filtering high-quality variants. We provide a runtime environment in the form of a docker image, wrapping a nextflow pipeline for efficient processing using parallel computing. The solution is complete in its form and is ready to use not only by computer scientists but accessible and easy to use for everyone working with Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing data.

Bioinformatics

A new stepwise synthesis of an octapeptide corresponding to a sequence around the "reactive" serine of chymotrypsin.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Variant Genotyping Methods Based on Long-Read Sequencing Data.

Benchmarking long-read aligners and SV callers for structural variation detection in Oxford nanopore sequencing data

Evaluation of 10 Different Pipelines for Bacterial Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection

Tradeoffs in alignment and assembly-based methods for structural variant detection with long-read sequencing data

Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software

SVmine Improves Structural Variation Detection by Integrative Mining of Predictions from Multiple Algorithms

A powerful random forest-based pipeline for accurately identifying the structural variants on panel sequencing data.

Overview of structural variation calling: Simulation, identification, and visualization

Hidden Biases in Germline Structural Variant Detection.

Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV

ProcaryaSV: structural variation detection pipeline for bacterial genomes using short-read sequencing

A Comparison of Structural Variant Calling from Short-Read and Nanopore-Based Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Optical Genome Mapping as a Benchmark

SVDF: enhancing structural variation detect from long-read sequencing via automatic filtering strategies

SVision: a deep learning approach to resolve complex structural variants

Comprehensive assessment of long-read sequencing platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variation

Comprehensive Assessment of Isoform Detection Methods for Third-Generation Sequencing Data

Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data

SVvalidation: A long-read-based validation method for genomic structural variation

Systematic Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection Methods from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

ConsensuSV-ONT - a modern method for accurate structural variant calling