Abstract:e18898 Background: Numerous studies have reported that the identification of structural variants (SVs) can provide ideal targets for cancer targeting therapy. However, on the one hand, the current algorithms exhibited different performances in detecting different types and sizes of SVs; on the other hand, the whole-genome/exome sequencing for detecting SVs is costly, and only a portion of SVs can be used to guide the clinical treatment of cancer patients. Therefore, developing a powerful, highly accurate, and cost-effective pipeline to detect SVs for clinical application is urgently required. Methods: Based on simulated sequencing data, four common SV detection tools (Delly, Lumpy, SvABA, and Manta) were used to select the best performance one. This tool will be used for detecting SVs in panel sequencing data. Then, Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) was used to annotate these SVs as true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) SVs. These annotated TP and FP SVs were used as input in the random forest classifier (RFC) to train a model for predicting the true or false positive SVs. Two independent testing cohorts and standards were used to validate this constructed pipeline. In addition, IHC/FISH experiments were performed to further validate these predicted TP SVs. Results: In the simulation data, the detection tool with the highest SVs identification sensitivity was Delly. By Delly, a total of 1,303 SVs in 384 tumor samples were detected. Based on annotated TP and FP SVs, an RFC model was constructed in the training cohort, which predicted 334 and 560 TP and FP SVs, respectively. The accuracy rates (AR) were 99.85% and 100% of TP and FP SVs, respectively. The predicted TP and FP SVs by constructed pipeline also showed a high accuracy rate in cohort 1 (98.96% and 99.24% of TP and FP SVs, respectively), cohort 2 (98.48% and 100% of TP and FP SVs, respectively), and standards (the mean accuracy rate was 90%). Finally, based on these TP SVs predicted by the constructed pipeline, FISH/IHC experiment results further verified the robustness of this pipeline (the man accuracy rate was 95.83%). Conclusions: The constructed random forest-based pipeline can robustly and accurately identify SVs based on panel sequencing data, which will be helpful for clinical decision-making.

Comprehensive and deep evaluation of structural variation detection pipelines with third-generation sequencing data

Comparative Analysis For The Performance Of Long-Read-Based Structural Variation Detection Pipelines In Tandem Repeat Regions

Evaluating Structural Variation Detection Tools for Long-Read Sequencing Datasets in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Variant Genotyping Methods Based on Long-Read Sequencing Data.

SVSR: A Program to Simulate Structural Variations and Generate Sequencing Reads for Multiple Platforms

Benchmarking long-read aligners and SV callers for structural variation detection in Oxford nanopore sequencing data

Systematic assessment of structural variant annotation tools for genomic interpretation

Evaluation of 10 Different Pipelines for Bacterial Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection

Tradeoffs in alignment and assembly-based methods for structural variant detection with long-read sequencing data

Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software

SVsearcher: A More Accurate Structural Variation Detection Method in Long Read Data.

SVmine Improves Structural Variation Detection by Integrative Mining of Predictions from Multiple Algorithms

A powerful random forest-based pipeline for accurately identifying the structural variants on panel sequencing data.

Overview of structural variation calling: Simulation, identification, and visualization

SVcnn: an Accurate Deep Learning-Based Method for Detecting Structural Variation Based on Long-Read Data

Hidden Biases in Germline Structural Variant Detection.

Identification of genomic indels and structural variations using split reads

Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV

ProcaryaSV: structural variation detection pipeline for bacterial genomes using short-read sequencing

A Comparison of Structural Variant Calling from Short-Read and Nanopore-Based Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Optical Genome Mapping as a Benchmark

SVDF: enhancing structural variation detect from long-read sequencing via automatic filtering strategies