Assessment of postoperative therapy de-escalation for early-stage, intermediate-risk cervical cancer

Koji Matsuo,Muneaki Shimada,Shinya Matsuzaki,Hiroko Machida,Shogo Shigeta,Hiroshi Yoshida,Kazuyoshi Kato,Hiroyuki Kanao,Munetaka Takekuma,Mikio Mikami,Aiko Okamoto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005597
2024-09-03
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Abstract:Objective The objective of this study was to assess the oncologic outcome of surgically-treated patients with early-stage, intermediate-risk cervical cancer according to postoperative therapy modality. Methods This retrospective cohort study queried the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group's nationwide surgical data platform. The study population was 1084 patients with stage IB cervical cancer who underwent primary radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from 2004 to 2008. Histology type-incorporated intermediate-risk factor patterns were clustered into three groups based on recurrence risk. Oncologic outcomes were assessed per postoperative therapy: external beam radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and no treatment. Results Histology-incorporated intermediate-risk groups included: no lympho-vascular space invasion in any histology, or squamous cell carcinoma with lympho-vascular space invasion but no deep stromal invasion (n=559, 51.6%, group 1); squamous cell carcinoma with both lympho-vascular space invasion and deep cervical stromal invasion (n=281, 25.9%; group 2); and non-squamous histology with lympho-vascular space invasion (n=244, 22.5%; group 3). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 93.3%, 89.3%, and 82.5% for group 1,–2, and −3, respectively (p 0.05). Conclusion In this retrospective investigation in Japan, active surveillance without postoperative therapy following radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy was not associated with oncologic outcome in early-stage, intermediate-risk cervical cancer.
oncology,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?