22 Open Vs. Minimally Invasive Radical Trachelectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: International Multicenter Irta Study Results
Gloria Salvo,Paulino Ramirez,Xiaohua Wu,Mario M. Leitao,BJ Mosgaard,Henrik Falconer,M. Perrotta,Gabriel Rendón,Ali Kucukmetin,И. В. Берлев,Jan Persson,Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira,David Cibula,C Fotopoulou,K. Liu,Reitan Ribeiro,ME Capilna,Dilyara Kaidarova,Glauco Baiocchi,X Li,J Li,Silvana Pedra-Nobre,Kolbrún Pálsdóttir,Florencia Noll,Stuart Rundle,Elena Ulrikh,Roman Kocián,Srdjan Saso,Zhijun Hu,Audrey Tieko Tsunoda,M.D. Gheorghe,Raikhan Bolatbekova,Brandelyn N. Pitcher,René Pareja
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-igcs.22
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To compare disease-free survival (DFS) between patients who underwent open (ORT) versus minimally invasive (MIS) radical trachelectomy (RT) [laparoscopic (LRT) or robotic (RRT)]. Methods Eligibility criteria included 1) RT and pelvic lymphadenectomy with/without sentinel lymph node mapping, 2) 1/2005 to 12/2017 3) squamous, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous histology, 4) stage IA2-IB1, 5) tumors ≤2 cm, 6) 15 or more cases per center. Results A total of 698 patients [open (n=388) vs. MIS (310)] were included. The median follow-up time was 40.9 months (range, 1–179.1) [MIS 38.6 (range, <1–128.1) vs. open 68.3 (range, <1–200.8) (p<0.001)]. MIS patients had smaller tumors (no visible lesion: 76.8% vs 57.0%, < 1 cm: 1.9% vs. 2.8%, 1–2 cm: 21.3% vs. 40.2%, p<0.001) and lower rates of residual disease (42.9% vs. 56.2% p<0.001). (table 1) There were no differences in rates of parametrial involvement (2.1% vs. 1.3% p=0.055), vaginal involvement (0.8% vs. 1.4% p=0.198), positive margins (2.9% vs. 3.5% p=0.766), or positive nodes (7.2% vs. 4.5%, p=4.02). (table 2) Patients who underwent open RT had longer hospital stay (6 (1–23) vs 2 (0–24) days, p<0.001) and received more adjuvant therapy (12.7% vs. 5.9%, p=0.003). MIS patients had more readmissions (11.0% vs. 1.8%, p<0.001) and reoperations (4.8% vs. 1.5%, p=0.01). There was no difference in recurrence rate (6.4% vs. 5.7%, p=0.7492), DFS (p=0.46) or OS (p=0.91) between MIS and open surgical approaches (figure 1). Conclusions Surgical approach in radical trachelectomy for low-risk cervical cancer was not associated with differences in recurrence rates or survival. MIS had worse perioperative outcomes.