Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Multiple Preoperative Treatments in Stage Ib2 to Iia Cervical Cancer.

H. Wen,X. H. Wu,J. Li,Z. T. Li,H. Wang,R. Y. Zang,G. H. Ke,M. Sun,W. T. Li,X. Huang,S. M. Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e15508
IF: 45.3
2011-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e15508 Background: Patients with stage IB2 to IIA cervical cancer have a poor survival whatever primary standard treatment is chosen. We conducted a study to demonstrate whether preoperative treatments could improve their prognosis. METHODS During Jan 2006 through Dec 2009, 123 patients were enrolled and randomized to four groups. 31 patients in Group 1(G1 for abbreviation) underwent radical surgery alone as control. Brachytherapy with a total dosage of 15Gy to point A in two fractions were delivered to 31 patients in G2 before surgery. 30 patients in G3 received intravenous chemotherapy consisting of DDP 50mg/m2 and 5-Fu 750mg/m2 every two weeks for two courses before surgery. 31 patients in G4 were administered intra-arterial chemotherapy with the same regimen as G3 before surgery. All patients underwent radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy regardless of response to preoperative therapy. Primary endpoints were PFS and OS. Largest tumor diameter on pathologic examination and pathologic risk factors (positive parametrium,positive lymph node,positive surgical margin,LVSI,large primary tumor(≥4cm) and deep stromal invasion) were also compared between groups. Analysis was done in per-protocol population. RESULTS Up to Dec 2010,114 of 123 (92.7%) patients were evaluable and followed for an average of 49.5 (3-57.5) months. Baseline characteristics(age,tumor volume at first visit,pathologic type and clinical stage)were similarly distributed in four groups. 26 recurrences and 19 deaths were observed. Two-year PFS were 71.2% for G1, 67.2% for G2, 84.2% for G3 and 85.0% for G4, respectively. Two-year OS were 82.5% for G1, 76.6% for G2, 95.8% for G3 and 88.6% for G4, respectively. No significant differences in PFS (p=0.26) or OS (p=0.30) were noted between groups. Each preoperative treatment reduced tumor volume significantly compared with the control (p=0.01). Except for large tumor size (p<0.01), no significant differences in pathologic risk factors were noted between groups. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative treatments did not improve survival significantly although each of them could lead to significant reduction of tumor volume.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?