Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Future Extrahepatic Metastasis and Macrovascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Sirui Fu,Meiqing Pan,Jie Zhang,Hui Zhang,Zhenchao Tang,Yong Li,Wei Mu,Jianwen Huang,Di Dong,Chongyang Duan,Xiaoqun Li,Shuo Wang,Xudong Chen,Xiaofeng He,Jianfeng Yan,Ligong Lu,Jie Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S319639
2021-09-04
Abstract:Purpose: For timely treatment of extrahepatic metastasis and macrovascular invasion (aggressive progressive disease [PD]) in hepatocellular carcinoma, models aimed at stratifying the risks of subsequent aggressive PD should be constructed. Patients and methods: After dividing 332 patients from five hospitals into training (n = 236) and validation (n = 96) datasets, non-invasive models, including clinical/semantic factors (ModelCS), deep learning radiomics (ModelD), and both (ModelCSD), were constructed to stratify patients according to the risk of aggressive PD. We examined the discrimination and calibration; similarly, we plotted a decision curve and devised a nomogram. Furthermore, we performed analyses of subgroups who received different treatments or those in different disease stages and compared time to aggressive PD and overall survival in the high- and low-risk subgroups. Results: Among the constructed models, ModelCSD, combining clinical/semantic factors and deep learning radiomics, outperformed ModelCS and ModelD (areas under the curve [AUCs] for the training dataset: 0.741, 0.815, and 0.856; validation dataset: 0.780, 0.836, and 0.862), with statistical difference per the net reclassification improvement, the integrated discrimination improvement, and/or the DeLong test in both datasets. Besides, ModelCSD had the best calibration and decision curves. The performance of ModelCSD was not affected by treatment types (AUC: resection = 0.839; transarterial chemoembolization = 0.895; p = 0.183) or disease stages (AUC: BCLC [Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer] stage 0 and A = 0.827; BCLC stage AB &B = 0.861; p = 0.537). Moreover, the high-risk group had a significantly shorter median time to aggressive PD than the low-risk group (training dataset hazard ratio [HR] = 0.108, p < 0.001; validation dataset HR = 0.058, p < 0.001) and poorer overall survival (training dataset HR = 0.357, p < 0.001; validation dataset HR = 0.204, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our deep learning-based model successfully stratified the risks of aggressive PD. In the high-risk population, current guideline indicates that first-line treatments are insufficient to prevent extrahepatic metastasis and macrovascular invasion and ensure survival benefits, so more therapies may be explored for these patients.