Automated graded prognostic assessment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using machine learning

Moritz Gross,Stefan P. Haider,Tal Ze’evi,Steffen Huber,Sandeep Arora,Ahmet S. Kucukkaya,Simon Iseke,Bernhard Gebauer,Florian Fleckenstein,Marc Dewey,Ariel Jaffe,Mario Strazzabosco,Julius Chapiro,John A. Onofrey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10624-8
IF: 7.034
2024-03-27
European Radiology
Abstract:Abstract Background Accurate mortality risk quantification is crucial for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, most scoring systems are subjective. Purpose To develop and independently validate a machine learning mortality risk quantification method for HCC patients using standard-of-care clinical data and liver radiomics on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods This retrospective study included all patients with multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI at the time of diagnosis treated at our institution. Patients were censored at their last date of follow-up, end-of-observation, or liver transplantation date. The data were randomly sampled into independent cohorts, with 85% for development and 15% for independent validation. An automated liver segmentation framework was adopted for radiomic feature extraction. A random survival forest combined clinical and radiomic variables to predict overall survival (OS), and performance was evaluated using Harrell’s C-index. Results A total of 555 treatment-naïve HCC patients (mean age, 63.8 years ± 8.9 [standard deviation]; 118 females) with MRI at the time of diagnosis were included, of which 287 (51.7%) died after a median time of 14.40 (interquartile range, 22.23) months, and had median followed up of 32.47 (interquartile range, 61.5) months. The developed risk prediction framework required 1.11 min on average and yielded C-indices of 0.8503 and 0.8234 in the development and independent validation cohorts, respectively, outperforming conventional clinical staging systems. Predicted risk scores were significantly associated with OS ( p < .00001 in both cohorts). Conclusions Machine learning reliably, rapidly, and reproducibly predicts mortality risk in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma from data routinely acquired in clinical practice. Clinical relevance statement Precision mortality risk prediction using routinely available standard-of-care clinical data and automated MRI radiomic features could enable personalized follow-up strategies, guide management decisions, and improve clinical workflow efficiency in tumor boards. Key Points • Machine learning enables hepatocellular carcinoma mortality risk prediction using standard-of-care clinical data and automated radiomic features from multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI. • Automated mortality risk prediction achieved state-of-the-art performances for mortality risk quantification and outperformed conventional clinical staging systems. • Patients were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups with significantly different survival times, generalizable to an independent evaluation cohort.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of quantifying the mortality risk for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, most scoring systems are subjective and cannot accurately reflect the survival risk of patients. Therefore, the researchers developed and independently validated a machine learning method based on standard clinical data and baseline multiphase enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver radiomics features to predict the overall survival (OS) of HCC patients. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Develop an automated method**: Utilize standard clinical variables and liver radiomics features automatically segmented from baseline multiphase enhanced MRI to predict the mortality risk of HCC patients through machine learning techniques. 2. **Validate the effectiveness of the method**: Evaluate the performance of this method in an independent validation cohort and compare it with traditional clinical staging systems. Through these objectives, the researchers hope to provide a reliable, rapid, and reproducible mortality risk prediction tool to guide clinical decision-making and improve the workflow efficiency of tumor boards.