Abstract:Over the past few decades, a new form of governance has emerged to replace adversarial and managerial modes of policy making and implementation. Collaborative governance, as it has come to be known, brings public and private stakeholders together in collective forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance. After reviewing 137 cases of collaborative governance across a range of policy sectors, we identify critical variables that will influence whether or not this mode of governance will produce successful collaboration. These variables include the prior history of conflict or cooperation, the incentives for stakeholders to participate, power and resources imbalances, leadership, and institutional design. We also identify a series of factors that are crucial within the collaborative process itself. These factors include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and the development of commitment and shared understanding. We found that a virtuous cycle of collaboration tends to develop when collaborative forums focus on ‘‘small wins’’ that deepen trust, commitment, and shared understanding. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance. Over the last two decades, a new strategy of governing called ‘‘collaborative governance’’ has developed. This mode of governance brings multiple stakeholders together in common forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an

Managing community governance: determinants and inhibiters

Determinants of Community Governance for Effective Basic Service Delivery in Nepal

Politics-Administration/Officials-Citizens: Exploring Linkages in Community Governance

Defining the limits of community governance

The Governance and Management of Effective Community Health Partnerships: A Typology for Research, Policy, and Practice

Community governance in rural Victoria: Rethinking grassroots democracy?

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

New community governance in small rural towns: the Australian experience

A thematic review on community governance from 2018 to 2023: Analysis of future research trends

Community Participation in the Public Decision Process: Realizing Better Governance in Public Administration

Community Participation in the Real World: Opportunities and Pitfalls in New Governance Spaces

The workings of collaborative governance: Evaluating collaborative community-building initiatives in Korea

Schools, Governance and Community: A Next Practice Intervention

From passive welfare to community governance: Youth NGOs in Australia and Scotland

Practicing Good Governance:a New Choice for Management of College Student Community

Structure and Governance of Communities for the Digital Society

Community College Faculty Conceptualizations of Shared Governance: Shared Understandings of a Sociopolitical Reality

Theorizing community health governance for strengthening primary healthcare in LMICs

Community structure and the behavior of transnational sustainability governors: Toward a multi‐relational approach

Governance Choice on a Serial Network