Abstract:Across both the developing and developed worlds, community engagement has become a key strategy for natural resource management. However, a growing number of studies report that community-based approaches are experiencing formidable challenges, with limited outcomes in terms of livelihoods, decentralization and sustainability. Yet, policies continue to focus attention unduly on “community participation”, ignoring the ways in which the “community” is itself embedded in a wider social system. Recent studies have shown that local communities are more complex than previously assumed, with local community actions being heavily shaped by wider social and environmental contexts. Yet, scholarly research tends to focus on reporting such cross-scalar dynamics, with little explanation of how and why they occur. This paper advances a framework to understand how local communities interact with the wider world, through what we term “delocalization of communities” in natural resource management. Using Bourdieu’s theory of social field, we present an approach to analyze various trajectories of delocalization involving the exchange of, and struggle for, a variety of resources valued in specific fields of natural resource governance.We extend the work of several researchers who have been critical of the conventional view of the community, and argue that a new model of delocalized “community” needs to be envisaged, one that emphasizes the interactions among actors within and between spatial scales and levels of political organization. While such a cross-scalar view is not novel, we deepen social field approach to assess how cross-scalar processes unfold in the course of “delocalization” of communities in the context of rapid social and environmental change. We draw on evidence from five different case studies from three continents that demonstrate specific aspects of the delocalization phenomenon.The cases selected are from Australia, Indonesia, Mexico, Nepal, and Papua New Guinea. We demonstrate through these cases that increasingly diverse interests in natural resources such as forests have served to delocalize communities beyond “local” domains. We conclude that local community is not a localized entity, and there are multiple cross-scale networks which need to be recognized, as these have profound implications in community-based natural resource management. In such situations, open and exploratory approaches - moving away from blueprint interventions - are required to facilitate context-specific fields and spheres of local democracy, nurturing diverse, flexible, and networked models of community participation, along with the recognition of political and economic influence coming from the wider domain.

Community structure and the behavior of transnational sustainability governors: Toward a multi‐relational approach

Structural Community Governance: Importance for Community‐Academic Research Partnerships

Governing sustainability or sustainable governance? Semantic constellations on the sustainability-governance intersection in academic literature

Structure and Governance of Communities for the Digital Society

Multistakeholder Initiatives and Sustainability? A Governance Analysis using the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO) as a Case Study

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Network approach for local and community governance of energy: The case of Oxfordshire

Delocalizing Communities: Changing Forms of Community Engagement in Natural Resources Governance

The Comparative Politics of Transnational Climate Governance

Organizational Structure from Interaction: Evidence from Corporate Sustainability Efforts

Collaborative governance and personal relationships for sustainability transformation in the textile sector

The Community Structure of the Global Corporate Network

The workings of collaborative governance: Evaluating collaborative community-building initiatives in Korea

Governing Complex Systems

Coalition-structured governance improves cooperation to provide public goods

An Analysis of the Path and Mechanism of Group Organizations Participating in Grass-Roots Social Governance from the Perspective Of"meta Network" — Taking the Construction of the First"Overseas Chinese Home"Community in Beijing As an Example

Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands

Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits

Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Actors in Collaborative Governance Processes

Network Governance in Action: Functions and Practices to Foster Collaborative Environments