Knowledge Based Automatic Scalability Analysis and Extrapolation for MPI Programs

Michael Kluge,A. Knüpfer,W. Nagel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11549468_22

2005-08-30

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Who makes health governance decisions at the local level? A cross sectional study from primary health facilities in Tanzania

Anosisye M. Kesale,Ally Kinyaga,Eliza Mwakasangula,Henry Mollel,Seif S. Rashid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1691

2023-11-01

Health Science Reports

Abstract:Abstract Background and Aims Lower‐ and middle‐income countries have decentralized decision‐making at the community level, as well as community governance structures, to encourage community participation in governance processes, particularly in primary healthcare (PHC). In Tanzania, decentralization resulted in the establishment of Health Facility Governing Committees (HFGCs) to encourage community participation in the governance of primary health facilities to improve the quality and responsiveness of health service delivery. Nonetheless, despite the presence of HFGCs, PHC delivery remains ineffective and of poor quality. It is unclear who makes governance decisions at PHC facilities to ensure that services delivered are of expected quality and respond the community's needs, tastes, and preferences. This paper aims to assess the perspectives of members of the HFGC on who make governance decision in the context of fiscal decentralization. Design and Methods A cross‐section design was used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. A four‐multistage sampling technique was adopted to selects regions, council, health facilities, and HFGC members. Respondents who participated in structured questionnaire responses were chosen using proportional sampling, whereas those who participated in in‐depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions were chosen using purposive selection. The data was analyzed descriptively and thematically. Results The study revealed that HFGCs members perceive that governance decisions in primary health facilities are primarily made by the health facility management, and later are presented in HFGCs. As such, HFGCs are used a passively used to justify participation in decision that was already made by the management, which contradict with the principal of decentralization that emphasizes community participation on fiscal decisions. Conclusion Decentralization of PHC facilities does not guarantee the participation of community members in fiscal decision of their respective primary health facilities through HFGCs. HFGC is passively used governance structure to substitute community participation in primary health facilities' fiscal decisions. Enforcement mechanisms are required to facilitate effective community participation.
Negotiating power relations, gender equality, and collective agency: are village health committees transformative social spaces in northern India?

Kerry Scott,Asha S. George,Steven A. Harvey,Shinjini Mondal,Gupteswar Patel,Kabir Sheikh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0580-4

2017-09-15

International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract:BackgroundParticipatory health initiatives ideally support progressive social change and stronger collective agency for marginalized groups. However, this empowering potential is often limited by inequalities within communities and between communities and outside actors (i.e. government officials, policymakers). We examined how the participatory initiative of Village Health, Sanitation, and Nutrition Committees (VHSNCs) can enable and hinder the renegotiation of power in rural north India.MethodsOver 18 months, we conducted 74 interviews and 18 focus groups with VHSNC members (including female community health workers and local government officials), non-VHSNC community members, NGO staff, and higher-level functionaries. We observed 54 VHSNC-related events (such as trainings and meetings). Initial thematic network analysis supported further examination of power relations, gendered “social spaces,” and the “discourses of responsibility” that affected collective agency.ResultsVHSNCs supported some re-negotiation of intra-community inequalities, for example by enabling some women to speak in front of men and perform assertive public roles. However, the extent to which these new gender dynamics transformed relations beyond the VHSNC was limited. Furthermore, inequalities between the community and outside stakeholders were re-entrenched through a “discourse of responsibility”: The comparatively powerful outside stakeholders emphasized community responsibility for improving health without acknowledging or correcting barriers to effective VHSNC action. In response, some community members blamed peers for not taking up this responsibility, reinforcing a negative collective identity where participation was futile because no one would work for the greater good. Others resisted this discourse, arguing that the VHSNC alone was not responsible for taking action: Government must also intervene. This counter-narrative also positioned VHSNC participation as futile.ConclusionsInterventions to strengthen participation in health systems can engender social transformation. However they must consider how changing power relations can be sustained outside participatory spaces, and how discourse frames the rationale for community participation.

public, environmental & occupational health
Community participation in the collaborative governance of primary health care facilities, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya

Jackline Sitienei,Lenore Manderson,Mabel Nangami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248914

IF: 3.7

2021-03-31

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Introduction Community participation in the governance of health services is an important component in engaging stakeholders (patients, public and partners) in decision-making and related activities in health care. Community participation is assumed to contribute to quality improvement and goal attainment but remains elusive. We examined the implementation of community participation, through collaborative governance in primary health care facilities in Uasin Gishu County, Western Kenya, under the policy of devolved governance of 2013. Methods Utilizing a multiple case study methodology, five primary health care facilities were purposively selected. Study participants were individuals involved in the collaborative governance of primary health care facilities (from health service providers and community members), including in decision-making, management, oversight, service provision and problem solving. Data were collected through document review, key informant interviews and observations undertaken from 2017 to 2018. Audio recording, notetaking and a reflective journal aided data collection. Data were transcribed, cleaned, coded and analysed iteratively into emerging themes using a governance attributes framework. Findings A total of 60 participants representing individual service providers and community members participated in interviews and observations. The minutes of all meetings of five primary health care facilities were reviewed for three years (2014–2016) and eight health facility committee meetings were observed. Findings indicate that in some cases, structures for collaborative community engagement exist but functioning is ineffective for a number of reasons. Health facility committee meetings were most frequent when there were project funds, with discussions focusing mainly on construction projects as opposed to the day-to-day functioning of the facility. Committee members with the strongest influence and power had political connections or were retired government workers. There were no formal mechanisms for stakeholder forums and how these worked were unclear. Drug stock outs, funding delays and unclear operational guidelines affected collaborative governance performance. Conclusion Implementing collaborative governance effectively requires that the scope of focus for collaboration include both specific projects and the routine functioning of the primary health care facility by the health facility committee. In the study area, structures are required to manage effective stakeholder engagement.

multidisciplinary sciences
Governance of community health worker programs in a decentralized health system: a qualitative study in the Philippines

Warren Dodd,Amy Kipp,Bethany Nicholson,Lincoln Leehang Lau,Matthew Little,John Walley,Xiaolin Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06452-x

2021-05-12

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:Abstract Background Community health worker (CHW) programs are an important resource in the implementation of universal health coverage (UHC) in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, in countries with decentralized health systems like the Philippines, the quality and effectiveness of CHW programs may differ across settings due to variations in resource allocation and local politics. In the context of health system decentralization and the push toward UHC in the Philippines, the objective of this study was to explore how the experiences of CHWs across different settings were shaped by the governance and administration of CHW programs. Methods We conducted 85 semi-structured interviews with CHWs ( n = 74) and CHW administrators ( n = 11) in six cities across two provinces (Negros Occidental and Negros Oriental) in the Philippines. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data with specific attention to how the experiences of participants differed within and across geographic settings. Results Health system decentralization contributed to a number of variations across settings including differences in the quality of human resources and the amount of financial resources allocated to CHW programs. In addition, the quality and provider of CHW training differed across settings, with implications for the capacity of CHWs to address specific health needs in their community. Local politics influenced the governance of CHW programs, with CHWs often feeling pressure to align themselves politically with local leaders in order to maintain their employment. Conclusions The functioning of CHW programs can be challenged by health system decentralization through the uneven operationalization of national health priorities at the local level. Building capacity within local governments to adequately resource CHWs and CHW programs will enhance the potential of these programs to act as a bridge between the local health needs of communities and the public health system.

health care sciences & services
Nurturing transformative local structures of multisectoral collaboration for primary health care: qualitative insights from select states in India

Shalini Singh,Emily Miller,Svea Closser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11002-2

2024-05-16

Abstract:Background: Multisectoral collaboration is essential for advancing primary health care (PHC). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limited institutional capacities, governance issues, and inadequate stakeholder engagement impede multisectoral collaboration. India faces similar challenges, especially at the meso-level (districts and subdistricts). Owing to its dependence on context, and insufficient evidence, understanding "How" to improve multisectoral collaboration remains challenging. This study aims to elicit specific recommendations to strengthen meso-level stewardship in India for multisectoral collaboration. The findings from this study may offer lessons for other LMICs. Methods: Using purposive, maximum variation sampling, the study team conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 diverse participants, including policymakers, implementers, development agency representatives, and academics experienced in multisectoral initiatives. The interviews delved into participants' experiences, the current situation, enablers, and recommendations for enhancing stakeholder engagement and capacities at the meso-level for multisectoral collaboration. Results: Context and power are critical elements to consider in fostering effective collaboration. Multisectoral collaboration was particularly successful in three distinct governance contexts: the social-democratic context as in Kerala, the social governance context in Chhattisgarh, and the public health governance context in Tamil Nadu. Adequate health system input and timely guidance instil confidence among local implementers to collaborate. While power plays a role through local leadership's influence in setting agendas, convening stakeholders, and ensuring accountability. To nurture transformative local leaders for collaboration, holistic, equity-driven, community-informed approaches are essential. The study participants proposed several concrete steps: at the state level, establish "central management units" for supervising local implementers and ensuring bottom-up feedback; at the district level, rationalise committees and assign deliverables to stakeholders; and at the block level, expand convergence structures and involve local self-governments. Development partners can support data-driven priority setting, but local implementers with contextual familiarity should develop decentralised plans collaboratively, articulating rationales, activities, and resources. Finally, innovative training programs are required at all levels, fostering humility, motivation, equity awareness, leadership, problem- solving, and data use proficiency. Conclusion: This study offers multiple solutions to enhance local implementers' engagement in multisectoral efforts, advocating for the development, piloting, and evaluation of innovative approaches such as the block convergence model, locally-led collaboration efforts, and novel training methods for local implementers.
Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review

Jennifer Hove,Lucia D’Ambruoso,Kathleen Kahn,Sophie Witter,Maria van der Merwe,Denny Mabetha,Kingsley Tembo,Rhian Twine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.2004730

IF: 2.996

2022-01-01

Global Health Action

Abstract:BACKGROUND: In South Africa, community participation has been embraced through the development of progressive policies to address past inequities. However, limited information is available to understand community involvement in priority setting, planning and decision-making in the development and implementation of public services.OBJECTIVE: This narrative review aims to provide evidence on forms, extents, contexts and dynamics of community participation in primary health care (PHC) and water governance in South Africa and draw cross-cutting lessons. This paper focuses on health and water governance structures, such as health committees, Catchment Management Agencies (CMA), Water User Associations (WUAs), Irrigation Boards (IBs) and Community Management Forums (CMFs).METHODS: Articles were sourced from Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, WHO Global Health Library, Global Health and Science Citation Index between 1994 and 2020 reporting on community participation in health and water governance in South Africa. Databases were searched using key terms to identify relevant research articles and grey literature. Twenty-one articles were included and analysed thematically.RESULTS: There is limited evidence on how health committees are functioning in all provinces in South Africa. Existing evidence shows that health committees are not functioning effectively due to lack of clarity on roles, autonomy, power, support, and capacity. There was slow progress in establishment of water governance structures, although these are autonomous and have mechanisms for democratic control, unlike health committees. Participation in CMAs/WUAs/IBs/CMFs is also not effective due to manipulation of spaces by elites, lack of capacity of previously disadvantaged individuals, inadequate incentives, and low commitment to the process by stakeholders.CONCLUSION: Power and authority in decision-making, resources and accountability are key for effective community participation of marginalized people. Practical guidance is urgently required on how mandated participatory governance structures can be sustained and linked to wider governance systems to improve service delivery.

public, environmental & occupational health
The link between UHC reforms and health system governance: lessons from Asia

Krishna Hort,Rohan Jayasuriya,Prarthna Dayal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2016-0220

2017-05-15

Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how and to what extent the design and implementation of universal health coverage (UHC) reforms have been influenced by the governance arrangements of health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); and how governments in these countries have or have not responded to the challenges of governance for UHC. Design/methodology/approach Comparative case study analysis of three Asian countries with substantial experience of UHC reforms (Thailand, Vietnam and China) was undertaken using data from published studies and grey literature. Studies included were those which described the modifications and adaptations that occurred during design and implementation of the UHC programme, the actors and institutions involved and how these changes related to the governance of the health system. Findings Each country adapted the design of their UHC programmes to accommodate their specific institutional arrangements, and then made further modifications in response to issues arising during implementation. The authors found that these modifications were often related to the impacts on governance of the institutional changes inherent in UHC reforms. Governments varied in their response to these governance impacts, with Thailand prepared to adopt new governance modes (which the authors termed as an "adaptive" response), while China and Vietnam have tended to persist with traditional hierarchical governance modes ("reactive" responses). Originality/value This study addresses a gap in current knowledge on UHC reform, and finds evidence of a complex interaction between substantive health sector reform and governance reform in the LMIC context in Asia, confirming recent similar observations on health reforms in high-income countries.
Community Health Committee: A Mechanism Innovation of Public Participation in Grassroots Health Service Management

ZHOU Chi,ZHOU Xu-dong,JIANG Min-min,MA Weihang,ZHENG Kaihang,ZHU Wei-xing,Therese Hesketh,LI Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6672.2010.04.017

2010-01-01

Abstract:Community Health Committee (CHC), an innovative public participation mechanism of grassroots health service management, established a bottom-up communication channel between the public and government to communicate health related problems and opinions, and set up a grassroots community health services supervision system. The rural residents were endowed with opportunities to take part in grassroots health care decision making and management by CHC. CHC changed the top-down model of traditional health management, improved the grassroots medical services, and increased governance capability of local government We introduced the CHC practice in Zhejiang project counties, exhibited the primary effects and experience of this pilot program, and explored new mechanism and model for rural community residents to participate in grassroots health service management
Evaluation of community-based participatory governance interventions to improve access to health-related public entitlements in India

Mayur Trivedi,Minjan Patel,Divya Nair H,Bharati Sharma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-03-2022-0030

2022-06-25

International Journal of Health Governance

Abstract:Purpose As the investment in social and health protection remained poor in India, the most vulnerable citizens lack access to existing health related government initiatives with transformational benefits due mostly to the lack of "accurate information". The purpose of this paper is to explore and demonstrate the impact of participation of the community through a structured intervention that promotes awareness, enables the community to ensure entitlements, and enhances the utilization of government initiatives. Design/methodology/approach Through a baseline–endline study using a quasi-experimental design, this research provides empirical evidence of such intervention on awareness and utilization of health, nutrition and developmental initiatives. It involved survey of 400 households from the four study locations before and after the interventions. The pre-post estimation in the "proportion of respondents who were fully aware" was analyzed to measure changes in knowledge. Mc-Nemar test was applied to measure the statistical significance of these changes. Findings The results indicate that the intervention of "empowerment centers" has increased knowledge and utilization of the various government schemes, services and facilities that are routine and offer benefits all household members, in general, and women as well as children, in particular. The intervention was found to be successful in improving the local governance systems; empowering communities, linking communities and local level government systems across all sectors, as well as bringing in inter-sectoral linkages across governments systems. Research limitations/implications Although there have been many interventions of community participation for reducing inequities across the globe, there is a dearth of documentation and evidence generation. More efforts are required to evaluate such interventions, identify which interventions work and how they can be adapted to different contexts. This also requires exploration of the social processes and contextual realities underlying these interventions. Originality/value To the best knowledge of the authors, this research is one-of-its-kind that assessed an intervention targeting cross-cutting schemes and services, beyond just health interventions. The evidence points to the success of grassroots level inter-sectoral community actions, in the form of empowerment centers, to improve awareness and utilization of government interventions through participatory governance, and points to the expanding scope of learning and adapting such interventions to different contexts and scopes.
Community participation in the health system: analyzing the implementation of community health committee policies in Kenya

Robinson Karuga,Marjolein Dieleman,Patrick Mbindyo,Kim Ozano,Judy Wairiuko,Jacqueline E W Broerse,Maryse Kok

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423623000208

2023-04-28

Abstract:Background: Community health committees (CHCs) are a mechanism for communities to voluntarily participate in making decisions and providing oversight of the delivery of community health services. For CHCs to succeed, governments need to implement policies that promote community participation. Our research aimed to analyze factors influencing the implementation of CHC-related policies in Kenya. Methods: Using a qualitative study design, we extracted data from policy documents and conducted 12 key informant interviews with health workers and health managers in two counties (rural and urban) and the national Ministry of Health. We applied content analysis for both the policy documents and interview transcripts and summarized the factors that influenced the implementation of CHC-related policies. Findings: Since the inception of the community health strategy, the roles of CHCs in community participation have been consistently vague. Primary health workers found the policy content related to CHCs challenging to translate into practice. They also had an inadequate understanding of the roles of CHCs, partly because policy content was not adequately disseminated at the primary healthcare level. It emerged that actors involved in organizing and providing community health services did not perceive CHCs as valuable mechanisms for community participation. County governments did not allocate funds to support CHC activities, and policies focused more on incentivizing community health volunteers (CHVs) who, unlike CHCs, provide health services at the household level. CHVs are incorporated in CHCs. Conclusion: Kenya's community health policy inadvertently created role conflict and competition for resources and recognition between community health workers involved in service delivery and those involved in overseeing community health services. Community health policies and related bills need to clearly define the roles of CHCs. County governments can promote the implementation of CHC policies by including CHCs in the agenda during the annual review of performance in the health sector.
A multi-case study of the vertically integrated health-care at county-level in rural China: towards holistic and dynamic governance

Wenhui Xu,Li Zhu,Zixuan Peng,Xu Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178179

IF: 5.2

2024-02-15

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Background: In contrast to the Grading Diagnosis and Treatment System (GDTS), Vertically Integrated Health-care at County-level (VIHC) is a strategic policy in rural China. This research intends to analyze the shift in governance paradigm with regard to the adjustment of the power structure and interest relationships among various participants, using the building of VIHC as a cut-in point. Methods: We carry out a multi-case study to investigate the paradigms of health governance when building VIHC in three different rural counties in China. Results: There were exchanges between government and other participants, vertical and horizontal collaborations among government divisions, and prompt responses to public requirements. County C's local administration, in particular, placed a strong emphasis on bureaucratic power and collaboration between various departments both within and outside of administrative boundaries. In contrast, County B's local administration emphasized the independence of healthcare practitioners and worked to win their support. In contrast to the previous two governments, County A encouraged social actors to participate and saw a little improvement in performance. Conclusion: In examining the health reform in rural China, this study paints a picture of the development of the health governance paradigm. In rural China, a comprehensive and dynamic governance paradigm was created through the integration of the health decision-making process, which was driven by the public's health needs, the operation mechanism, which featured both competition and cooperation, and the action logic of sharing responsibility.

public, environmental & occupational health
Determinants of Community Governance for Effective Basic Service Delivery in Nepal

Keshav K. Acharya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v10i0.15885

2016-10-04

Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology

Abstract:Community governance is an approach of shift from governmentality to governance. This is more flexible approach extends beyond government, and the place of its agencies, to a greater sharing of power between the state, the market and civil society via new network and partnership structures. This paper analyses the determinants of community governance at the grassroots level in Nepal for the efficient delivery of basic services based on primary data sources. 110 locally constituted community based organisations were selected for an organisational survey. Additionally, three focus group discussions and 40 in-depth interviews were employed for information collection. A multiple linear regression model was used for data analysis, which revealed 12 variables such as Inclusive participation (X1), Empowerment of the people (X2), Transparency and accountability (X3) Enabling environment (X4), Practice of local democracy (X5), Service effectiveness (X6), Service integrity (X7), Social capital development (X8), Institution building (X9), Community mobilisation (X10) Planning, implementation, and monitoring (X11), Coordination, linkage, and partnership (X12) are significantly influencing governance practice. Results indicated a 14 percent variance between dependent and independent variables. This shows the overall practice of governance at the community level was malfunctioned, which can be attributed to a number of factors. First, many community-based organisations (CBOs) do not adopt governance mechanisms in their approach to development. Second, despite a crisis in governance, some CBOs have participated in the service delivery process. Third, this crisis has been a foremost obstacle in the working culture of CBOs. This analysis further explores the problem from the perspective of socio-economic structure, power politics and interests, institutional issues, and capacity and resource constraints.
The role of health system governance in strengthening the rural health insurance system in China

Beibei Yuan,Weiyan Jian,Li He,Bingyu Wang,Dina Balabanova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0542-x

2017-05-23

International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract:BackgroundSystems of governance play a key role in the operation and performance of health systems. In the past six decades, China has made great advances in strengthening its health system, most notably in establishing a health insurance system that enables residents of rural areas to achieve access to essential services. Although there have been several studies of rural health insurance schemes, these have focused on coverage and service utilization, while much less attention has been given to the role of governance in designing and implementing these schemes.MethodsInformation from publications and policy documents relevant to the development of two rural health insurance policies in China was obtained, analysed, and synthesise. 92 documents on CMS (Cooperative Medical Scheme) or NCMS (New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme) from four databases searched were included. Data extraction and synthesis of the information were guided by a framework that drew on that developed by the WHO to describe health system governance and leadership.ResultsWe identified a series of governance practices that were supportive of progress, including the prioritisation by the central government of health system development and certain health policies within overall national development; strong government commitment combined with a hierarchal administrative system; clear policy goals coupled with the ability for local government to adopt policy measures that take account of local conditions; and the accumulation and use of the evidence generated from local practices. However these good practices were not seen in all governance domains. For example, poor collaboration between different government departments was shown to be a considerable challenge that undermined the operation of the insurance schemes.ConclusionsChina’s success in achieving scale up of CMS and NCMS has attracted considerable interest in many low and middle income countries (LMICs), especially with regard to the schemes’ designs, coverage, and funding mechanisms. However, this study demonstrates that health systems governance may be critical to enable the development and operation of such schemes. Given that many LMICs are expanding health financing system to cover populations in rural areas or the informal sectors, we argue that strengthening specific practices in each governance domain could inform the adaptation of these schemes to other settings.

public, environmental & occupational health
Governance of global health research consortia: Sharing sovereignty and resources within Future Health Systems

Bridget Pratt,Adnan A Hyder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.039

Abstract:Global health research partnerships are increasingly taking the form of consortia that conduct programs of research in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). An ethical framework has been developed that describes how the governance of consortia comprised of institutions from high-income countries and LMICs should be structured to promote health equity. It encompasses initial guidance for sharing sovereignty in consortia decision-making and sharing consortia resources. This paper describes a first effort to examine whether and how consortia can uphold that guidance. Case study research was undertaken with the Future Health Systems consortium, performs research to improve health service delivery for the poor in Bangladesh, China, India, and Uganda. Data were thematically analysed and revealed that proposed ethical requirements for sharing sovereignty and sharing resources are largely upheld by Future Health Systems. Facilitating factors included having a decentralised governance model, LMIC partners with good research capacity, and firm budgets. Higher labour costs in the US and UK and the funder's policy of allocating funds to consortia on a reimbursement basis prevented full alignment with guidance on sharing resources. The lessons described in this paper can assist other consortia to more systematically link their governance policy and practice to the promotion of health equity.
Public accountability needs to be enforced –a case study of the governance arrangements and accountability practices in a rural health district in Ghana

Sara Van Belle,Susannah H. Mayhew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1836-1

2016-10-12

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:BackgroundImproving public accountability is currently high on the global agenda. At the same time, the organisation of health services in low- and middle-income countries is taking place in fragmented institutional landscapes. State and non-state actors are involved in increasingly complex governance arrangements. This often leads to coordination problems, confusion of roles and responsibilities and possibly accountability gaps. This study aimed at assessing the governance arrangements and the accountability practices of key health actors at the level of a Ghanaian health district with the aim to understand how far public accountability is achieved.MethodsWe adopted the case study design as it allows for in-depth analysis of the governance arrangements and accountability relations between actors, their formal policies and actual accountability practices towards the public and towards stakeholders. Data were collected at a rural health district using in-depth interviews, observation and document review. In the analysis, we used a four-step sequence: identification of the key actors and their relationships, description of the multi-level governance arrangements, identification of the actual accountability relations and practices between all actors and finally appraisal of the public accountability practices, which we define as those practices that ensure direct accountability towards the public.ResultsIn this rural health district with few (international) non-governmental organisations and private sector providers, accountability linkages towards management and partners in health programmes were found to be strong. Direct accountability towards the public, however, was woefully underdeveloped. This study shows that in settings where there is a small number of actors involved in organising health care, and where the state actors are underfunded, the intense interaction can lead to a web of relations that favours collaboration between partners in health service delivery, but fails public accountability.ConclusionsIt is clear that new formal channels need to be created by all actors involved in health service delivery to address the demand of the public for accountability. If the public does not find an adequate response to its genuine concerns, distrust between communities and service users on one hand, and providers, international non-governmental organisations and District Health Management Teams on the other is likely to increase to the detriment of all parties’ interests.

health care sciences & services
Governance in health workforce: how do we improve on the concept? A network-based, stakeholder-driven approach

Max Ying Hao Lim,Vivian Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00545-0

IF: 4.5

2021-01-02

Human Resources for Health

Abstract:Abstract Background Health workforce governance has been proposed as key to improving health services delivery, yet few studies have examined the conceptualisation of health workforce governance in detail and exploration in literature remains limited. Methods A literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar and grey literature search was conducted to map out the current conceptualisation of health workforce governance. We identified all published literature relating to governance in health workforce since 2000 and analysed them on two fronts: the broad definition of governance, and the operationalisation of broad definition into key dimensions of governance. Results Existing literature adopts governance concepts established in health literature and does not adapt understanding to the health workforce context. Definitions are largely quoted from health literature whilst dimensions are focused around the sub-functions of governance which emphasise operationalising governance practices over further conceptualisation. Two sub-functions are identified as essential to the governance process: stakeholder participation and strategic direction. Conclusions Although governance in health systems has gained increasing attention, governance in health workforce remains poorly conceptualised in literature. We propose an improved conceptualisation in the form of a stakeholder-driven network governance model with the national government as a strong steward against vested stakeholder interests. Further research is needed to explore and develop on the conceptual thinking behind health workforce governance.

health policy & services,industrial relations & labor
Fostering good governance at peripheral public health facilities: an experience from Nepal

G Gurung,S Tuladhar,Gagan Gurung,Sabita Tuladhar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22605/rrh2042

2013-03-25

Rural and Remote Health

Abstract:CONTEXT: The Nepalese primary healthcare system at sub-district level consists of three different levels of health facility to serve the mostly rural population. The Ministry of Health and Population decentralised health services by handing over 1433 health facilities in 28 districts to Health Facility Operation and Management Committees (HFOMCs), which were formed following a public meeting, and consist of 9 to 13 members, representing the health facility in-charge, elected members of the village development committee, dalit (disadvantaged caste) and women members. The purpose was to make this local committee responsible for managing all affairs of the health facility. However, the handing over of the health facilities to HFOMCs was not matched by an equivalent increase in the managerial capacity of the members, which potentially makes this initiative ineffective.ISSUE: The Health Facility Management Strengthening Program was implemented in 13 districts to foster good governance in the health facilities by increasing the capacity of HFOMCs. This effort focuses on capacity building of HFOMCs as a continuous process rather than a one-off event. Training, follow-up and promotional activities were conducted. This article focuses on how good governance at the peripheral public health facilities in Nepal can be fostered through the active engagement and capacity building of HFOMCs. This article used baseline and monitoring data collected during technical support visits to HFOMCs and their members between July 2008 and October 2011.LESSONS LEARNED: The results show that the Health Facility Management Strengthening Program was quite successful in strengthening local health governance in the health facilities. The level of community engagement in governance improved, that is, the number of effective HFOMC meetings increased, the inclusion of dalit/women members in the decision-making process expanded, resource mobilization was facilitated, and community accountability, as measured by health facility opening days, increased. Furthermore, availability of technical staff, supervision and monitoring, and display of the citizen charter increased, and health services became more inclusive. Several lessons emerged. Functioning of HFOMCs is largely dependent on the process of selecting members, the staff and community's support of the HFOMC, and a sense of volunteerism and team spirit among the members. Similarly, to ensure the effective participation of dalit/woman members, the educational and livelihood empowerment of the members is deemed necessary. Furthermore, capacity building of and giving authority to HFOMCs should go hand-in-hand.CONCLUSION: Local governance of health facilities was fostered through the local people's active engagement in HFOMCs and capacity building of the HFOMC members.

public, environmental & occupational health
Transforming Grassroots Associations through Community Governance in Nepal

Keshav Kumar Acharya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3297059

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper examines the transforming process of grassroots associations through community governance in Nepal based on primary information. Overall 110 community-based organizations from five Village Development Committees of Dang district Nepal was selected for the unit of analysis. Both quantitative and qualitative techniques were adopted to collect the information within a framework of six different variables. Weightage Average Index (WAI) method was employed to analyze the quantitative data, which further triangulated through qualitative data measures. Findings indicate that the overall outcome (WAI = 0.78) of community governance was highly effective. First, it contributed to replacing the hierarchical power structure within the community. Second, this new notion contributed to putting a community at centre and helped increasing accessibility on service functions. Nevertheless, some social anomalies imposed to block the voices of marginalized communities, because service functions were influenced by the hierarchical power structure. In these groups, the influence of elites endured in many ways. First, they entered as facilitators, supporters, and enablers. Second, they gradually captured the groups, social capital, and the decision-making process. Third, they began to capture the physical assets mainly natural resources, cooperatives funds, and government and donor’s fund. Finally, they utilized it for their political benefits, which badly affected the governance and vandalized the social capital. Despite these manipulations, internal and external agencies' contributions played an important role in inducing and sustaining grassroots associations, as they are facilitating to downsize the complex issue of community governance.
Translating the Elements of Health Governance for Integrated Care from Theory to Practice: A Case Study Approach

Caroline Nicholson,Julie Hepworth,Letitia Burridge,John Marley,Claire Jackson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3106

2018-01-01

International Journal of Integrated Care

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Against a paucity of evidence, a model describing elements of health governance best suited to achieving integrated care internationally was developed. The aim of this study was to explore how health meso-level organisations used, or planned to use, the governance elements.METHODS: A case study design was used to offer two contrasting contexts of health governance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants who held senior governance roles. Data were thematically analysed to identify if the elements of health governance were being used, or intended to be in the future.RESULTS: While all participants agreed that the ten elements were essential to developing future integrated care, most were not used. Three major themes were identified: (1) organisational versus system focus, (2) leadership and culture, and, (3) community (dis)engagement.DISCUSSION: Several barriers and enablers to the use of the elements were identified and would require addressing in order to make evidence-based changes.CONCLUSION: Despite a clear international policy direction in support of integrated care this study identified a number of significant barriers to its implementation. The study reconfirmed that a focus on all ten elements of health governance is essential to achieve integrated care.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services

Knowledge Based Automatic Scalability Analysis and Extrapolation for MPI Programs

Who makes health governance decisions at the local level? A cross sectional study from primary health facilities in Tanzania

Negotiating power relations, gender equality, and collective agency: are village health committees transformative social spaces in northern India?

Community participation in the collaborative governance of primary health care facilities, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya

Governance of community health worker programs in a decentralized health system: a qualitative study in the Philippines

Nurturing transformative local structures of multisectoral collaboration for primary health care: qualitative insights from select states in India

Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review

The link between UHC reforms and health system governance: lessons from Asia

Community Health Committee: A Mechanism Innovation of Public Participation in Grassroots Health Service Management

Evaluation of community-based participatory governance interventions to improve access to health-related public entitlements in India

Community participation in the health system: analyzing the implementation of community health committee policies in Kenya

A multi-case study of the vertically integrated health-care at county-level in rural China: towards holistic and dynamic governance

Determinants of Community Governance for Effective Basic Service Delivery in Nepal

The role of health system governance in strengthening the rural health insurance system in China

Governance of global health research consortia: Sharing sovereignty and resources within Future Health Systems

Public accountability needs to be enforced –a case study of the governance arrangements and accountability practices in a rural health district in Ghana

Governance in health workforce: how do we improve on the concept? A network-based, stakeholder-driven approach

Fostering good governance at peripheral public health facilities: an experience from Nepal

Transforming Grassroots Associations through Community Governance in Nepal

Translating the Elements of Health Governance for Integrated Care from Theory to Practice: A Case Study Approach