Facile synthesis of MnO2/CNT nanocomposite and its electrochemical performance for supercapacitors
Hongjuan Wang,Cheng Peng,Feng Peng,Hao Yu,Jian Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2011.05.043
2011-01-01
Abstract:Highlights ► MnO 2 /CNTs are prepared by direct redox reaction between KMnO 4 and carbon nanotubes. ► This preparation method is a simple and green without any other additives. ► MnO 2 /CNTs show specific capacitance of 162.2 F g −1 at the current density of 0.2 A g −1 . ► MnO 2 /CNTs exhibit excellent charge–discharge property. Abstract A nanocomposite of manganese dioxide coated on the carbon nanotubes (MnO 2 /CNTs) was synthesized by a facile direct redox reaction between potassium permanganate and carbon nanotubes without any other oxidant or reductant addition. The morphology, microstructure and crystalline form of this MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transition electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The electrochemical properties are characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD). The results show that the facile prepared MnO 2 /CNTs nanocomposite shows specific capacitance of 162.2 F g −1 at the current density of 0.2 A g −1 and excellent charge/discharge property with 90% of its specific capacitance kept after 2000 cycles at the current density of 5 A g −1 . Keywords Supercapacitor Manganese dioxides Specific capacitance Charge–discharge Carbon nanotubes 1 Introduction In recent years, supercapacitors, also called electrochemical capacitors (ECs), have attracted great attention due to their high power density, excellent reversibility, long cyclic life and potential application in electrical vehicle, power sources, portable computers and other devices [1–3] . Supercapacitors, based on the charge–discharge mechanisms, can be classified into two kinds. The first one is called electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), including various carbon materials [4–9] with high specific surface area such as activated carbon, carbon nanotubes and graphene, which utilize the capacitance arising from charge separation at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The other one is called pseudo-capacitors, including transition-metal oxides [10–12] and conducting polymers [13–15] , which utilize the pseudo-capacitance arising from the fast, reversible redox reaction occurring at the electrode surface. Compared with the EDLC capacitance, the pseudo-capacitance is much larger. Take hydrated RuO 2 as an example, its specific capacitance was reported to be as high as 720 F g −1 in acidic electrolyte [16] . However, Ru is a kind of noble metal and at the same time RuO 2 is toxic, which blocked its commercialization. At present, manganese oxide has drawn much attention due to its low cost, abundance, high theoretical specific capacitance (1370 F g −1 ) and good environmental compatibility [17–21] . But the real specific capacitance of MnO 2 is far from the theoretical value. The reason for this difference can be due to the poor conductivity of MnO 2 and the low utilization ratio of active component [22–24] . Only a very thin surface layer of MnO 2 takes part in the charge–discharge process while the underlying MnO 2 material cannot participate in the reaction. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), including single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) are considered as potential electrode materials for supercapacitors due to their excellent mechanical property, good electrical conductivity and chemical stability. Many attempts have been made in this area of coating MnO 2 on carbon nanotubes to taking advantage of both the excellent electrical conductivity of CNTs and the high capacitance of manganese oxide. Wei et al. prepared amorphous MnO 2 /SWNT composites as supercapacitor electrode materials by a chemical precipitation technique with KMnO 4 as precursor and oxidant and ethanol as reductant. The obtained MnO 2 /SWCNTs composite showed the specific capacitance of 110 F g −1 after 750 cycles at the current density of 2 A g −1 [25] . Chou et al. electrodeposited MnO 2 nanowires onto the surface of carbon nanotubes paper by a cyclic voltammetric technique and the as-prepared MnO 2 nanowire/CNT composite paper electrode displayed specific capacitance of 167.5 F g −1 at a current density of 77 mA g −1 [26] . Zhen et al. prepared MnO 2 /CNT/graphite electrode by thermally deposition with the specific capacitance of MnO 2 reached surprising 568 F g −1 . However the loading amount of MnO 2 by this method is too small to be used in practical application (about 37 μg cm −2 ) [27] . Recently, Chen and his co-workers filled MnO 2 nanoparticles into CNTs to prepare CNT-confined MnO 2 nanoparticles to fully use the electric conductivity of CNTs. It showed the specific capacitance of 225 F g −1 for the composite and MnO 2 normalized capacitance as high as 1250 F g −1 [28] . Ajayan et al. synthesized multi-segmented Au-MnO 2 /CNT coaxial arrays to construct supercapacitor with the maximum specific capacitance of 68 F g −1 , a power density of 33 kW kg −1 , and an energy density of 4.5 Wh kg −1 [29] . In this paper, carbon nanotubes were used both as reducing agent and as support. Potassium permanganate was reduced directly by carbon nanotubes and the product MnO 2 deposited onto the surface of CNTs to form MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite. Thus facile prepared MnO 2 /CNTs nanocomposite shows specific capacitance of 162.2 F g −1 at the current density of 0.2A g −1 and excellent charge/discharge property with 90% of its specific capacitance kept after 2000 cycles at the current density of 5 A g −1 . 2 Experimental 2.1 MnO 2 /CNT preparation and characterization Manganese dioxide was deposited on CNTs (multi-walled CNTs, Shenzhen nanoport) through a direct redox reaction between the CNTs and MnO 4 − . Firstly, the CNT was treated with nitric acid at 110 °C for 3 h in order to remove iron catalyst from CNT growth and to improve the wetting ability of the CNT surface. Then, 100 mg of acid-treated CNT was dispersed in 100 ml KMnO 4 aqueous solution water in a three-necked round-bottomed flask by ultrasonic vibration for 30 min, and then 10 ml acetic acid was added into the mixture to make a sour environment (pH ≈ 2.3, room temperature). After that, the suspension was refluxed at 70 °C with continuously magnetic stirring for 3 h. Finally, the mixture was filtered and washed with deionized water and acetone several times to remove the residual KMnO 4 . The solid product was dried in a vacuum at 70 °C for 12 h to obtain MnO 2 /CNT. The Mn content in the MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite was analyzed by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA, Shimadzu, EPMA-1600). The morphology of the material was characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI, Nova NanoSEM 430) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI, Tecnai 12). The crystallographic structure of the prepared composite was determined by a powder X-ray diffraction system (XRD, D/max-IIIA spectrometer) equipped with Cu Kα radiation. The chemical valence of Mn in this composite was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, VG Scientific ESCALAB MKII) using Al Kαradiation(1486.71 eV). Spectra correction was conducted using the C 1s line at 284.6 eV. 2.2 Preparation of working electrode and electrochemical measurement The working electrode was prepared with the following steps. The as-prepared nanocomposite, XC-72 and poly (tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) were mixed in a mass ratio of 75:25:5 and dispersed in a certain amount of ethanol. Then the resulting slurry was coated onto the nickel foam substrate (1 cm × 1 cm) with a spatula. After that, nickel foam with composite slurry was dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven for 12 h and pressed under 10 MPa. All electrochemical measurements were carried out in a three electrode cell connected to an electrochemical analyzer (Eco Chemie B. V., Autolab PGSTAT30). The working electrode was the Ni foam coated with MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite. A titanium foil plated with Iridium-tantalum alloy was used as the counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl with saturated KCl electrode was used as the reference electrode. The measurements were carried out in a 0.5 mol l −1 Na 2 SO 4 aqueous electrolyte at room temperature. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests were carried out between −0.15 and 0.85 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) at different scan rates of 2, 10, 30, 50, 100 and 200 mV s −1 . EIS measurements were carried out in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz at open circuit potential with an ac perturbation of 5 mV. Galvanostatic charge–discharge measurement was carried out in 0.5 mol l −1 Na 2 SO 4 electrolyte between −0.1 and 0.8 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). The loading mass of MnO 2 /CNT on the working electrode is about 4–5 mg cm −2 and the current density set in the charge/discharge measurement is 1, 0.5 and 0.2 A g −1 , respectively. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Characterization of MnO 2 /CNT composite Fig. 1 showed the SEM images of acid-treated CNTs and MnO 2 /CNT with different MnO 2 contents. From Fig. 1 a, it can be seen that the acid-treated CNTs exhibit regular morphology with the diameter of about 50 nm. The acid treatment modifies the walls of the CNTs with carbonyl, carboxyl and or hydroxyl groups, which are beneficial for the dispersion of CNTs and the deposition of MnO 2 on the surface of CNTs [27] . During the deposition of MnO 2 on CNTs, CNTs served not only as support but also as reducer and no additional reducer was needed. Such preparation technology meets the demand of green preparation and green chemistry and is easy to be scaled up. At low MnO 2 content ( Fig. 1 b), the surface of the CNTs was partly coated by MnO 2 nanoflakes and some part of the CNTs was naked. With the increase of MnO 2 content, the cross-linked nanoflakes formed a thick and uniform layer on the surface of CNTs and simultaneously the length of the CNTs became short ( Fig. 1 c and d) due to its oxidation by KMnO 4. From the TEM pattern ( Fig. 1 e), we can see that the average size of the nanoflakes is about 30 nm and the thickness of the MnO 2 layer is about 30–50 nm. XRD patterns of pristine CNT and MnO 2 /CNT with different MnO 2 contents were shown in Fig. 2 . It can be seen that the original CNTs only show a sharp peak at around 26° and a broad weak peak at around 44° ( Fig. 2 a), which are the characteristic of graphite carbon. Fig. 2 b–f showed the typical patterns of the MnO 2 /CNT samples. The three major diffraction peaks of 2 θ at around 12°, 37° and 66° can be assigned to the crystal planes of (0 0 1), (1 1 1) and (0 2 0) in birnessite-type MnO 2 (JCPDS 42-1317, δ-MnO 2 ), respectively [30–33] . The weak and broad XRD peaks of MnO 2 even with very high MnO 2 content mean that most MnO 2 is in amorphous nature. The amorphous parts are beneficial to increase the specific capacitance for the supercapacitor because the highly amorphous structure should favor the electrolyte to insert into or to expel out from the oxide matrix, which can increase contact between the electrolyte and the electrode material and then improve the utilization ratio of the material. XRD spectra also showed that the three diffraction peaks of MnO 2 become more obvious with the MnO 2 content increase and at the same time the peaks of CNTs become weaker and weaker. This tendency indicates that the layer of MnO 2 became thicker and more and more surface of the CNTs was covered by MnO 2 . The XPS spectrum of Mn 2p in MnO 2 /CNT was shown in Fig. 3 . The binding energies of Mn 2p 3/2 and Mn 2p 1/2 were 642.2 and 653.8 eV, respectively, which indicates that the element manganese in the sample existed in the chemical state of Mn(IV) [30] . 3.2 Electrochemical performance of MnO 2 /CNT composite From the cyclic voltammograms of pristine CNTs and MnO 2 /CNTs in 0.5 M Na 2 SO 4 aqueous solutions (as shown in Fig. 4 ), a typical double-layer capacitive behavior of CNT electrode could be seen clearly, which probably arises from the high surface area of CNTs. For MnO 2 /CNT, the cyclic voltammograms showed rectangular-like shape with a pair of weak peaks at about 0.5–0.6 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and the capacitive current is much larger than that of the CNTs. This result indicates that MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite has good capacitive performance in Na 2 SO 4 aqueous solution. The pair of weak peaks may be attributed to the reversible redox reactions between Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ [34–37] . In the Na 2 SO 4 aqueous solution, the reaction mechanism of MnO 2 can be described by the following equation: MnO 2 + Na + + e − ⇔ MnO 2 Na From this equation, we can see that active MnO 2 , Na + and electron incorporates together to react reversibly to form MnO 2 Na, which means that MnO 2 active species, available ionic and electric conductivity will influence the specific capacitance. Fig. 4 also showed the effect of MnO 2 content on the specific capacitance. It can be seen that the increase of the MnO 2 content contributes to the specific capacitance at relatively low MnO 2 content. When the content of MnO 2 reached around 44%, the further increase of MnO 2 content will no longer increase the capacitive current of MnO 2 /CNT. There may be some reasons for this phenomenon. On the one hand, when the MnO 2 content is rather high, the MnO 2 will fully cover the surface of CNTs. This compact layer of MnO 2 would seriously hinder the diffusion of electrolyte. The inner layer of MnO 2 cannot participate in the reaction and then lower the utilization rate of MnO 2 . On the other hand, the MnO 2 layer on the surface of the CNTs causes the lower “macroscopic” electronic conductibility of this nanocomposite [35] . At the same time, with higher MnO 2 content, more KMnO 4 reacts with carbon nanotubes, the graphite surface of carbon nanotubes would be over oxidized and CNTs become much shorter [33] , which would disturb their profitable electrical conductibility. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopic studies were performed to investigate the influence of MnO 2 content on the resistance of the nanocomposite. The Nyquist plot for MnO 2 /CNTs with different MnO 2 contents was shown in Fig. 4 b. All of the AC impedance spectra composed of a depressed arc in the high-frequency region and a straight line in the low-frequency region. The high frequency arc is associated with the solution or electrolyte resistance ( R e ) and the bulk particle resistance ( R p ) [25,29,38] . The electrolyte resistance ( R e ) is almost invariant (about 1.68 Ω). However the bulk particle resistance ( R p ) increases with the increase of MnO 2 content (0.12, 0.15, 0.345, 0.553 Ω for 30.7%, 44.4%, 59.4% and 77.7% MnO 2 content, respectively). For low-frequency region, the slope of the straight line also decreases with the increase of MnO 2 content. All these further confirmed that the excessive MnO 2 indeed causes the increase of resistance. From the above, it can be concluded that the appropriate content of MnO 2 in this nanocomposite is 44.4%. All the following experiments were based on 44.4% MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite. In order to deeply understand the electronic behavior of MnO 2 /CNT in Na 2 SO 4 aqueous solution, CV curves of the nanocomposite with different scan rates were investigated, shown in Fig. 5 . From Fig. 5 a, it can be seen that the current response increases gradually with the increase of the scan rate. At all the scan rates, the CV curves show almost rectangular and symmetric current-potential shapes, indicating the perfect electrochemical capacitive behavior of the MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite. As shown in Fig. 5 b, the anodic currents (measured at 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and the scan rates show a linear relationship, which also confirms the capacitive behavior of the MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite [27,39,40] . The specific capacitance of MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite can be estimated by the following equation: C = 1 υ ( V c − V a ) ∫ V a V c I m d V where C is the specific capacitance (F g −1 ), ν is the potential scan rate (mV s −1 ), V c – V a is the potential range (from −0.1 V to 0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and I m denotes the response current (A g −1 ) based on the mass of MnO 2 /CNT composite. The specific capacitances of MnO 2 /CNT composite at different scan rate calculated from CVs were shown in Fig. 5 c. At the scan rate of 2 mV s −1 , the composite exhibits a specific capacitance (SC) of about 150 F g −1 , which is larger than those reported in literatures [29,33,35] . As the scan rate increases, the specific capacitance decreases, which is typical for electrochemically active MnO 2 material. The specific capacitances of MnO 2 /CNT are 139, 129, 122, 105 and 99.8 F g −1 for scan rates of 10, 30, 50, 100 and 200 mV s −1 , respectively. The dependence of SCs on scan rates can be explained by the diffusion of Na + ions in MnO 2 matrix. At low scan rate, the reaction rate is low. So, Na + ions have enough time to diffuse into all the available pores of the MnO 2 , leading to a complete insertion reaction and then showing almost ideal capacitive behavior. However, at high scan rate, the reaction rate increases, Na + ions donot have enough time to diffuse into all the available pores of MnO 2 and the internal active MnO 2 species cannot be used, which causes lower specific capacitance. 3.3 Charge/discharge performance of MnO 2 /CNT composite Fig. 6 a shows the constant-current charge/discharge curves of the prepared MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite. The linear and almost symmetrical curves indicate that the excellent electrochemical reversibility and capacitive performance of MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite. The specific capacitance can be calculated by the equation C = I × t m Δ E , where m (g) is the total mass of MnO 2 /CNT, I (A) is the current density, t is the charging (or discharging) time, Δ E (V) is potential window (in this paper, Δ E = 0.9 V). The specific capacitance of MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite is 119.3, 122.4 and 162.2 F g −1 at the current density of 1, 0.5 and 0.2 A g −1 , respectively. These specific capacitance values calculated from the charge/discharge are in comparable with those obtained from CV tests. The long-term electrochemical stability was investigated by charge/discharge cycling at the current density of 5A g −1 , as shown in Fig. 6 b. It can be seen that the specific capacity of MnO 2 /CNT is 82.3 F g −1 after 2000 cycles of charge/discharge cycling with 90% of its original value (91.3 F g −1 ), and no significant change could be observed from SEM pattern ( Fig. 1 f), which means that the prepared MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite has excellent charge/discharge stability. 4 Conclusions MnO 2 /CNT composite with different contents of birnessite-type MnO 2 coated on carbon nanotubes was successively synthesized in this work through a facile, simple and green method of the redox reaction between KMnO 4 and carbon nanotubes without any other oxidant or reductant addition. The MnO 2 /CNT with 44.4% MnO 2 shows the best electrochemical capacitive performance with the specific capacitance of the MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite reaches 162.2 F g −1 at the current density of 0.2 A g −1 and shows excellent charge/discharge property with 90% of its specific capacitance kept after 2000 cycles at the current density of 5 A g −1 . The facile, simple and green preparation method, cheap raw materials and the acceptable capacitive performance make this MnO 2 /CNT nanocomposite attractive for commercial supercapacitor application. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the New Century Excellent Talents in University ( NCET-08-0205 ) and the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 9251064101020 ) for financial support. References [1] C.Z. Yuan B. Gao L.H. Su X.G. Zhang Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 322 2008 545 550 [2] E. Frackowiak F. Beguin Carbon 39 2001 937 950 [3] P. Simon Y. Gogotsi Nature Materials 7 2008 845 854 [4] W. Kim J.B. Joo N. Kim S. Oh P. Kim J. Yi Carbon 47 2009 1407 1411 [5] Q.A. Li R.R. Jiang Y.Q. Dou Z.X. Wu T. Huang D. Feng J.P. Yang A.S. Yu D.Y. Zhao Carbon 49 2011 1248 1257 [6] Y.J. Lee J.C. Jung J. Yi S.H. Baeck J.R. Yoon I.K. Song Current Applied Physics 10 2010 682 686 [7] Y. Yamada O. Kimizuka K. Machida S. Suematsu K. Tamamitsu S. Saeki Y. Yamada N. Yoshizawa O. Tanaike J. Yamashita F. Don K. Hata H. Hatori Energy & Fuels 24 2010 3373 3377 [8] E.S. Snow F.K. Perkins E.J. Houser S.C. Badescu T.L. Reinecke Science 307 2005 1942 1945 [9] J.R. Miller R.A. Outlaw B.C. Holloway Science 329 2010 1637 1639 [10] T. Brousse D. Belanger Electrochemical and Solid State Letters 6 2003 A244 A248 [11] R.N. Reddy R.G. Reddy Journal of Power Sources 132 2004 315 320 [12] J.G. Wen X.Y. Ruan Z.T. Zhou Rare Metal Materials and Engineering 38 2009 930 934 [13] W. Xing S.P. Zhuo H.Y. Cui Z.F. Yan Materials Letters 61 2007 4627 4630 [14] H. Gomez M.K. Ram F. Alvi P. Villalba E. Stefanakos A. Kumar Journal of Power Sources 196 2011 4102 4108 [15] Z.H. Zhou N.C. Cai Y. Zeng Y.H. Zhou Chinese Journal of Chemistry 24 2006 13 16 [16] T.R. Jow J.P. Zheng Journal of the Electrochemical Society 145 1998 49 52 [17] M. Toupin T. Brousse D. Belanger Chemistry of Materials 16 2004 3184 3190 [18] C.C. Hu T.W. Tsou Electrochemistry Communications 4 2002 105 109 [19] R.N. Reddy R.G. Reddy Journal of Power Sources 124 2003 330 337 [20] S.B. Ma K.W. Nam W.S. Yoon X.Q. Yang K.Y. Ahn K.H. Oh K.B. Kim Journal of Power Sources 178 2008 483 489 [21] E. Beaudrouet A.L.G. La Salle D. Guyomard Electrochimica Acta 54 2009 1240 1248 [22] E. Raymundo-Pinero V. Khomenko E. Frackowiak F. Beguin Journal of the Electrochemical Society 152 2005 A229 A235 [23] H. Zhang G.P. Cao Z.Y. Wang Y.S. Yang Z.J. Shi Z.N. Gu Nano Letters 8 2008 2664 2668 [24] J.M. Ko K.M. Kim Materials Chemistry and Physics 114 2009 837 841 [25] V. Subramanian H.W. Zhu B.Q. Wei Electrochemistry Communications 8 2006 827 832 [26] S.L. Chou J.Z. Wang S.Y. Chew H.K. Liu S.X. Dou Electrochemistry Communications 10 2008 1724 1727 [27] Z. Fan J.H. Chen M.Y. Wang K.Z. Cui H.H. Zhou W. Kuang Diamond and Related Materials 15 2006 1478 1483 [28] W. Chen Z. Fan L. Gu X. Bao C. Wang Chemical Communications 46 2010 3905 3907 [29] A.L.M. Reddy M.M. Shaijumon S.R. Gowda P.M. Ajayan Journal of Physical Chemistry C 114 2010 658 663 [30] J. Yan Z.J. Fan T. Wei J. Cheng B. Shao K. Wang L.P. Song M.L. Zhang Journal of Power Sources 194 2009 1202 1207 [31] Y.J. Yang C.D. Huang Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 14 2010 1293 1301 [32] S. Devaraj N. Munichandraiah Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112 2008 4406 4417 [33] X.F. Xie L. Gao Carbon 45 2007 2365 2373 [34] Y. Li H.Q. Xie J.F. Wang L.F. Chen Materials Letters 65 2011 403 405 [35] Y.Q. Wang A.B. Yuan X.L. Wang Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 12 2008 1101 1107 [36] J. Yan T. Wei J. Cheng Z.J. Fan M.L. Zhang Materials Research Bulletin 45 2010 210 215 [37] R.R. Jiang T. Huang Y. Tang J. Liu L.G. Xue J.H. Zhuang A.H. Yu Electrochimica Acta 54 2009 7173 7179 [38] H.Y. Chu Q.Y. Lai L. Wang J.F. Lu Y. Zhao Ionics 16 2010 233 238 [39] P. Yu X. Zhang Y. Chen Y.W. Ma Z.P. Qi Materials Chemistry and Physics 118 2009 303 307 [40] J.W. Liu J. Essner J. Li Chemistry of Materials 22 2010 5022 5030