Abstract:We are about to publish in the Routledge Editor's Choice series a collection called The Philosophy, Methodology and Pedagogy of Collective Writing. This collection of collections represents the development of the philosophy, methodology and pedagogy of collective writing as it informs members of the Editors' Collective (EC) who also edit, write, review and contribute to Educational Philosophy and Theory (EPAT) and also now to PESA Agora (<a class="ext-link" href="https://pesaagora.com/">https://pesaagora.com/</a>, Editor: Tina Besley) and Access (<a class="ext-link" href="https://pesaagora.com/access-journal/">https://pesaagora.com/access-journal/</a>, Editor: Nina Hood), two 'journals' recently developed by PESA members of EC. In my thinking as the editor of EPAT for over twenty years, I have been concerned with the narrowness of the status of the academic article and the conventions that tightly structure it as a product of industrial culture. Not much has changed in the form of the academic article in the last twenty-five years. If anything, the conventions have hardened and solidified. I have been interested in experimenting with the journal and the academic article, which in the humanities and social sciences still tends to emulate to old model of the lonely scholar operating on their own – an individual author responsible for 'research' who publishes an article of six to seven thousand words with abstract, keywords, introduction, analysis or argument, often methodology, results and conclusion. Copyright is generally signed over to a publisher, and the article, once published after blind peer review, ends up in a journal that then becomes the basis for tenure or promotion in a 'publish or perish' culture. It's a system that drains every last drop of creativity from academic writing forced to focus on the phenomenon of pure information or data. After the digitisation of publishing that occurred in the 1990s academic journals began to offer new possibilities for publishing formats, different distributive forms of collaboration, new multiple forms of collective authorship and also new forms of open review.

Contributing to global literature on theory, practice, and methods

When Methods Meet Motives: methodological pluralism in Social Work research

Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors

Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018

An accidental discovery of scientific fraud: A reconstruction

Writing with “Academic Style”: Theoretical considerations and preliminary findings on the new frontiers of EAP

Reflecting on Motivations: How Reasons to Publish affect Research Behaviour in Astronomy

Scholarly mathematical communication at a crossroads

Principles and Practices of Methodology and Methods in Cross-Cultural Psychology

Exploring the philosophy and practice of collective writing

Editorial: Open science and methods review for Child and Adolescent Mental Health

A Multi-dimensional Investigation of the Effects of Publication Retraction on Scholarly Impact

The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review.

Registered reports and replications: An ongoing Journal of School Psychology initiative

'How would you call this in English?' : Being reflective about translations in international, cross-cultural qualitative research

Redirecting discourse in music therapy

OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HOW WE LEARN ABOUT METHODOLOGY AND STATISTICS

Money, methods, and morals: What are development economists up to?

What meta‐research has taught us about research and changes to research practices

Promoting an open research culture