Abstract:The scientific literature is a record of the search for truth. Publication of faked data diverts this search. The scientific community has a duty to warn people to ignore an article containing faked data and must try to prevent inadvertent citation of it. The scientific community accomplishes these tasks by publishing a retraction and linking it to the fraudulent article's citation in electronic indexes of the medical literature, such as PubMed. This mechanism is far from perfect, as shown by a case history of scientific fraud perpetrated by Eric Poehlman, PhD. His institution notified 3 journals that they had published tainted articles. Two journals failed to retract. The third journal retracted immediately, but other authors continued to cite the retracted article. Another duty of the scientific community is to verify the integrity of other articles published by the author of a fraudulent article. This task falls to the author's institution and requires coauthors to vouch for their article's integrity by convincing institutional investigators that the suspect author could not have altered the raw scientific data from their study. Two universities are currently investigating Poehlman's published research. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific literature requires governmental institutions that have the authority to investigate and punish guilty scientists and requires that research institutions investigate alleged fraud. It requires journal editors to issue a retraction when they learn that their journal has published a tainted article. It requires research institutions to accept their responsibility to investigate every article published by a scientist who has published even 1 fraudulent article. Finally, it requires authors to take pains to avoid citing retracted articles and to issue a correction when they inadvertently cite a retracted article.

An accidental discovery of scientific fraud: A reconstruction

Retraction: The turnaway study: A case of self-correction in science upended by political motivation and unvetted findings

Retraction of: "Network meta-analysis: a new analysis tool of the experimental evidence"

Retraction: Fake News Detection on Social Media Using Machine Learning (J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1916 012235)

Retraction of: "Authorship growth and self- citations: a scholarly expedient that demonstrates that the use of the metrics for career decisions generates malpractice and misbehavior?"

Retracted: Gender Differences in Teaching and Research Performance of University Teachers Based on Discrete Data Analysis

Retracted: Mostar Index of Cycle-Related Structures

Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case

Retracted: A Recommended Approach to Classical Literature and Art Exhibition Activities Oriented towards Interactive Modelling

Retracted: The Ecological Consciousness of Natural Writing in British and American Romantic Literature

Retracted: Urban Road Landscape Design and Digital Twin Simulation Modeling Analysis

Retracted: Knowledge Graph Analysis of Digital Emergency Management Research Based on CiteSpace Visualisation: Comparative Analysis of WOS and CNKI Databases

Patterns of retractions from 1981-2020 : Does a fraud lead to another fraud?

Retracted: Research of the Context Recommendation Algorithm Based on the Tripartite Graph Model in Complex Systems

'Doing good science is hard': retraction of high-profile reproducibility study prompts soul-searching

Retracted: Dynamic Analysis of Network Protocol Hiding Behavior Based on Perceptual Mining

Retraction: Instance Level Human Parts Detection Using Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning (J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1916 012065)

Retracted: The Spread, Rise, and Fall of University Students' Interconnected Internet Public Opinion in the Age of Big Data

Retracted: 3D Video Analysis and Its Application in Developmental and Educational Psychology Teaching

Retracted: Intelligent Analysis of Core Identification Based on Intelligent Algorithm of Core Identification

Retracted: Key Frame Extraction Method for Minors' Participation in Online Short-Form Video from the Perspective of Government Administration