Abstract:The confidence that scientists and the public have in the reliability of the primary scientific literature stems from a cardinal feature of scientific knowledge itself; that it is public knowledge open to verification by anyone independently, and that its validity does not depend upon the authority of the individual/persons reporting the knowledge. Thus, it has been the norm that extravagant claims made on deliberately falsified data (or wrongly interpreted data driven by an overabundance of enthusiasm) were rare, and exposed early on after publication. Retractions, when made by authors due to honest errors, served to enhance the confidence in scientific knowledge, and is considered a demonstration of the inherent nature of scientific knowledge to correct itself, as it progresses.However, the large number of retractions by publishers that are now being reported has made a dent in this confidence. It was recently reported in Nature that there were over 10,000 retractions in 2023. The reasons for the retractions were multifarious, and included papers identified as coming from paper mills, papers where images and data had been manipulated and papers published after fraudulent peer review.Of special interest was the observation that the largest number of retractions were from special issues related to specific topics or conference proceedings. There is a legitimate view that special issues serve a purpose and can enhance the profile of a journal. Nevertheless, it is ironical that special issues today are not special, but have become common, and have lost the original high purpose for which they were intended; to bring together a limited number of papers by established scientists on an emerging topic of relevance and current interest, which could spur on further development.Editorial boards need to be alert to the increasing amount of malpractice among unethical practitioners professing to be scientists. The COPE documents on retractions provide sound and practical guidelines to minimize the publication of dubious papers which would need to be retracted later.

'Doing good science is hard': retraction of high-profile reproducibility study prompts soul-searching

Retraction: The turnaway study: A case of self-correction in science upended by political motivation and unvetted findings

Reliability of the primary scientific literature

Retracted: The Spread, Rise, and Fall of University Students' Interconnected Internet Public Opinion in the Age of Big Data

Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years — why?

Retracted: Research on the Path and Effect Evaluation of Students' Quality Improvement in Private Colleges

Retracted: An Empirical Study on the Relationship among Mental Health, Learning Engagement, and Academic Self-Efficacy of Senior High School Students

Retracted: Gender Differences in Teaching and Research Performance of University Teachers Based on Discrete Data Analysis

Retracted: The Ecological Consciousness of Natural Writing in British and American Romantic Literature

Retractions: Stamp out fake peer review

Retracted: Analysis on Influence of Business Intelligence Information Quality over User Information Adoption Based on Multiple Mediating Effects

Retracted: Exploring the Path of Enhancing Ideological and Political Education in Universities in the Era of Big Data

Retracted: Applying Blockchain Technology in Network Public Opinion Risk Management System in Big Data Environment

RETRACTION: "Analyzing the factors affecting the attitude of public toward lockdown, institutional trust, and civic engagement activities"

Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case

Retraction: Security Aware High Scalable paradigm for Data Deduplication in Big Data cloud computing Environments (J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1916 012097)

Retracted: Land Price Distortion, Financial Development, and Regional Innovation

Retracted: The Impact of Study Setting on Clinical Characteristics in Older Chinese Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline: Baseline Investigation of Convenience and Population-Based Samples

Readership Awareness Series – Paper 9: Retraction of a Publication

Retraction: Fake News Detection on Social Media Using Machine Learning (J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1916 012235)

Retracted: Precision Strategy of Ideological and Political Education Using Big Data Analysis in Online Behavior Monitoring Environment