Abstract:Experimentation has been extended to almost every subfield of economics,including microeconomics and macroeconomics.Since the 1980s,economists have come to increasingly rely on experiments to explain and predict economic phenomenon.However,it takes mainstream economists dozens of years to turn their attitude from questioning and rejecting to accepting and supporting.This was partly due to the great efforts exerted by experimental pioneers,but more important was a result of the paradigm shift that occurred in economics in 1980s when the dominant position of General Equilibrium Theory was challenged by alternative theories such as Game Theory,Industrial Organization,and Public Choices,etc. Nevertheless,many critics are calling into question the artefact,reality,validity,especially external validity of laboratory experiments.Lab experiments,indeed,are not the solution to every question,especially those questions that involve interactions among hundreds of thousands of people or involve context-dependent variables that could not be randomized.But there are many types of questions and theories that are not specific to a group of people or a place or a context.Lab experiments are an excellent tool for these questions.It's noteworthy that the uprising of field experiments in the last decades has offset the weakness of lab experiments to a large extent.When feasible,the natural field experiment is an ideal kind of experiment that combines the advantages of both lab experiments and natural experiments because the subjects do not know that they are participating in an experiment.Experimental economics is developing quickly.However,it is not driven by criticisms and pressure from outside,but largely by the interaction of experiment and theory from inside,especially from the interdisciplinary interaction between the sister subfields of experimental economics and behavioral economics.Although they have different emphases,the divide between them is increasingly narrowed.Experimental economists and behavioral economics(and psychologists) are recently increasingly interested in thinking about the same kind of questions.Indeed,some researchers would find it difficult to classify themselves into one group or the other.They start to learn from each other and employ the cumulative knowledge of both subfields in their research.The emergence of Neuro-economics is a typical example.Neuro-economics is an area that bridges the fields of psychology,economics and neuro-science.It is question and interest,not method,that direct the development of this subject. Experimental Economics could certainly play an important role in the development of China,both in theory and practice.This is not only reflected in the commonplaces of experimental economics,namely,testing theory,searching for rule,and whistling besides the ears of princes,but also in the sense that it provides a good opportunity for us to develop theories and to design mechanisms that are context-dependent by solid empirical study.

Money, methods, and morals: What are development economists up to?

The Rising and Challenge of Experimental Economics

The Influence of Randomized Controlled Trials on Development Economics Research and on Development Policy

Developing and Publishing Strong Empirical Research in Sustainability Management—Addressing the Intersection of Theory, Method, and Empirical Field

Opening the gates: The increasing impact of papers beyond the top five and other changes in economic publishing

Social Economics, Poverty, and Human Development: Conceptual Approaches, Empirical Analysis, and Policy

Publishing experiences of researchers in the developing world: An analysis of submissions to the Review of Development Economics, January 2015 to April 2022

Journals as constituents of scientific discourse: economic heterodoxy

David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system

Women’s Empowerment and Economic Development: A Feminist Critique of Storytelling Practices in “Randomista” Economics

Financial data science: the birth of a new financial research paradigm complementing econometrics?

Editorial – TREE special issue

New developments in financial economics

Conventional wisdom, meta‐analysis, and research revision in economics

Bringing Excitement to Empirical Business Ethics Research: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics

Development Economics and the issues of poverty and social inequalities

The path of economics research production: Insights into the seesaw between theory and empirics

Behind the curtains of academic publishing: strategic responses of economists and business scholars

The historical roots of economic development

The science of ecological economics: a content analysis of Ecological Economics, 1989-2004

Crossing disciplinary boundaries: An ethnographic exploration of academic publishing invitations