Abstract:There are at least two approaches to the definition of consciousness. In the first case, certain aspects of consciousness, called qualia, are considered inaccessible for research from a third person and can only be described through subjective experience. This approach is inextricably linked with the so-called "hard problem of consciousness", that is, the question of why consciousness has qualia or how any physical changes in the environment can generate subjective experience. With this approach, some aspects of consciousness, by definition, cannot be explained on the basis of external observations and, therefore, are outside the scope of scientific research. In the second case, a priori constraints do not constrain the field of scientific investigation, and the best explanation of the experience in the first person is included as a possible subject of empirical research. Historically, in the study of cause-and-effect relationships in biology, it was customary to distinguish between proximate causation and ultimate causation existing in biological systems. Immediate causes are based on the immediate influencing factors [1]. Proximate causation has evolutionary explanations. When studying biological systems themselves, such an approach is undoubtedly justified, but it often seems insufficient when studying the interaction of consciousness and the brain [2,3]. Current scientific communities proceed from the assumption that the physical substrate for the generation of consciousness is a neural network that unites various types of neurons located in various brain structures. Many neuroscientists attach a key role in this process to the cortical and thalamocortical neural networks. This question is directly related to experimental and clinical research in the field of disorder of consciousness. Progress in this area of medicine depends on advances in neuroscience in this area and is also a powerful source of empirical information. In this area of consciousness research, a large amount of experimental data has been accumulated, and in this review an attempt was made to generalize and systematize.

The consciousness wars: can scientists ever agree on how the mind works?

Daily briefing: Can scientists ever agree on how consciousness works?

An Adversarial Collaboration to Critically Evaluate Theories of Consciousness

An evidence-based critical review of the mind-brain identity theory

Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness

Consciousness and neurosurgery

Testing the Conjecture That Quantum Processes Create Conscious Experience

Toward a standard model of consciousness: Reconciling the attention schema, global workspace, higher-order thought, and illusionist theories

Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond

Towards a Science of Mind

Conscious Representations: An Intractable Problem for the Computational Theory of Mind

Methodological aspects of studying the mechanisms of consciousness

Establishing consciousness in non-communicative patients: a modern-day version of the Turing test

Does brain activity cause consciousness? A thought experiment

An Adversarial Collaboration Protocol for Testing Contrasting Predictions of Global Neuronal Workspace and Integrated Information Theory

The quantum mind

Consciousness and brain function

Unifying biophysical consciousness theories with MaxCon: maximizing configurations of brain connectivity

Facing up to the hardest problem: The human information field and the ontological primacy of subjective consciousness

The cognitive reality monitoring network and theories of consciousness

The neural correlates of conscious experience: an experimental framework