Abstract:Dick F.Swaab presented in his recent book a claim that we are our brains.Obviously,the claim is a kind of expression on the mind body problem.The claim of ″We Are Our Brains″ gives a definite and correct recognition of the embodiment of consciousness,but it covers the fact of experiential reality of consciousness,so it is a single track which will cause unnecessary misunderstanding.A robust metaphysics of consciousness is a coherent system of ideas which should give a unified and self consistent account of the three basic facts about the phenomena of consciousness,that is,physical reality,experiential reality and reality of the corresponding unity of the two.Since the beginning of the modern times,in face of the three facts,scientific materialism and dualism have encountered their own insuperable dilemmas.Materialism can properly explain the physical aspect of the phenomena of consciousness but at the expense of the experiential aspect of the phenomena;on the other hand,dualism gives legal force to both aspects of the physical and the experiential but at the expense of the unity of the phenomena of consciousness.In order to avoid the dilemmas of the two,a reasonable resulting solution has to be a dual aspect monism or a panpsychism.Furthermore,a panexperientialism has to be developed so as to solve some problems in the traditional panpsychism.The core contributions of panexperientialism to the metaphysics of consciousness are as follows:(1) It has speculatively demonstrated that an actual entity has an aspect as epistemological object(physical aspect) as well as an aspect as ontological subject(experiential aspect).(2) There is an evolutionary developmental spectrum in the physical aspect of an actual entity,that is,its physical system will grow increasingly complicated;similarly,there is an evolutionary developmental spectrum in the experiential aspect,whose manifestation is an increasingly enriched mind.(3) There is a corresponding relation between the two spectrums of an actual entity.Panexperientialism has preliminarily solved the dilemma in materialism and dualism in a sense of speculative schema.If,however,we intend to give a further account of why there are necessarily two aspects in an actual entity and why there has to be a corresponding relation between the two aspects,we think it is more proper to call panexperientialism a dual-perspective monism.The reason of an actual entity(aE1) as a subject is that it is ontologically an agent of its own goings-on(its acts and reactions) and the undertaking of the agent is the first-person prehending of the subject.On the other hand,being relative to the other actual entity(aE2),the aE1 comes to be a ″perceived″ object,so it becomes an observed object from the first-person perspective of the aE2.As a result,the two categories of mind and body which human beings have utilized to describe the phenomena of consciousness are just respective appearances of dual perspectives of an actual entity,namely the first person perspective as experiential subject and the third-person perspective as observed object.And the relation of the physical aspect to the experiential one is a naturally-such correspondence rather than a generating/generated relation.It is inappropriate to characterize the relation of neural activities to conscious experiences with causal concepts;rather,the physical aspect of the world is causally closed,and consciousness itself is non-causal.

Facing up to the hardest problem: The human information field and the ontological primacy of subjective consciousness

Consciousness in the Modern World View and Its Philosophical Hard Problem

Metaphysics of Consciousness and Dual Perspective Monism

Why Is Anything Conscious?

Quantum mechanics, objective reality, and the problem of consciousness

Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem

Methodological aspects of studying the mechanisms of consciousness

Understanding Physical Processes in Describing a State of Consciousness: A Review

Imagination: The dawn of consciousness: Fighting some misconceptions in the discussion about consciousness

Consciousness as a state of matter

A unifying theory of physics and biological information through consciousness

Panpsychism and dualism in the science of consciousness

Hard Problem and Free Will: an information-theoretical approach

Approaching the nature of consciousness through a phenomenal analysis of early vision. What is the explanandum?

Inattentive Perception, Time, and the Incomprehensibility of Consciousness

Amplifying Phenomenal Information: Toward a Fundamental Theory of Consciousness

An Unavoidable Mind-Set Reversal: Consciousness in Vision Science

The meta-problem and the transfer of knowledge between theories of consciousness: a software engineer's take

An Adversarial Collaboration to Critically Evaluate Theories of Consciousness

Inner privacy of conscious experiences and quantum information

Elements of Consciousness and Cognition. Biology, Mathematic, Physics and Panpsychism: an Information Topology Perspective