Abstract:Key PointsThe neuronal correlates of consciousness (NCC) are the minimum neuronal mechanisms jointly sufficient for any one specific conscious experience. It is important to distinguish full NCC (the neural substrate supporting experience in general, irrespective of its specific content), content-specific NCC (the neural substrate supporting a particular content of experience — for example, faces, whether seen, dreamt or imagined) and background conditions (factors that enable consciousness, but do not contribute directly to the content of experience — for example, arousal systems that ensure adequate excitability of the NCC).The no-report paradigm allows the NCC to be distinguished from events or processes — such as selective attention, memory and response preparation — that are associated with, precede or follow conscious experience. In such paradigms, trials with explicit reports are included along with trials without explicit reports, during which indirect physiological measures are used to infer what the participant is perceiving.The best candidates for full and content-specific NCC are located in the posterior cerebral cortex, in a temporo-parietal-occipital hot zone. The content-specific NCC may be any particular subset of neurons within this hot zone that supports specific phenomenological distinctions, such as faces.The two most widely used electrophysiological signatures of consciousness — gamma range oscillations and the P3b event-related potential — can be dissociated from conscious experiences and are more closely correlated with selective attention and novelty, respectively.New electroencephalography- or functional MRI-based variables that measure the extent to which neuronal activity is both differentiated and integrated across the cortical sheet allow the NCC to be identified more precisely. Moreover, a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation–electroencephalography procedure can predict the presence or absence of consciousness in healthy people who are awake, deeply sleeping or under different types of anaesthesia, and in patients with disorders of consciousness, at the single-person level.Extending the NCC derived from studies in people who can speak about the presence and quality of consciousness to patients with severe brain injuries, fetuses and newborn infants, non-mammalian species and intelligent machines is more challenging. For these purposes, it is essential to combine experimental studies to identify the NCC with a theoretical approach that characterizes in a principled manner what consciousness is and what is required of its physical substrate.

Does brain activity cause consciousness? A thought experiment

The neural correlates of conscious experience: an experimental framework

Discerning Artificial Consciousness from Artificial Intelligence - A Thought Experiment

Consciousness In Neural Networks?

A Computational Neuroscience Approach to Consciousness

Consciousness, Decision-Making And Neural Computation

A thought experiment on consciousness

Is artificial consciousness achievable? Lessons from the human brain

Intracranial neural representation of phenomenal and access consciousness in the human brain

[Some implications of the "consciousness and brain" problem]

Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems

Chapter 9 Consciousness , Decision-Making and Neural Computation

Establishing consciousness in non-communicative patients: a modern-day version of the Turing test

Neural origins of self-generated thought: Insights from intracranial electrical stimulation and recordings in humans

Consciousness and neurosurgery

The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience

A common neural code for similar conscious experiences in different individuals

AI and the Neurobiology of Consciousness

Testing the Conjecture That Quantum Processes Create Conscious Experience

Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition

An Adversarial Collaboration to Critically Evaluate Theories of Consciousness