The Histogram Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Kurtosis Model in the Diagnosis and Grading of Prostate Cancer—A Preliminary Study

Chunmei Li,Lu Yu,Yuwei Jiang,Yadong Cui,Ying Liu,Kaining Shi,Huimin Hou,Ming Liu,Wei Zhang,Jintao Zhang,Chen Zhang,Min Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.604428

IF: 4.7

2021-10-27

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Objectives This study was conducted in order to explore the value of histogram analysis of the intravoxel incoherent motion-kurtosis (IVIM-kurtosis) model in the diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer (PCa), compared with monoexponential model (MEM). Materials and Methods Thirty patients were included in this study. Single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) diffusion-weighted images ( b -values of 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1,000, 1,500, 2,000 s/mm 2 ) were acquired. The pathologies were confirmed by in-bore MR-guided biopsy. The postprocessing and measurements were processed using the software tool Matlab R2015b for the IVIM-kurtosis model and MEM. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually. Mean values of D , D *, f , K , ADC, and their histogram parameters were acquired. The values of these parameters in PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)/prostatitis were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to investigate the diagnostic efficiency. The Spearman test was used to evaluate the correlation of these parameters and Gleason scores (GS) of PCa. Results For the IVIM-kurtosis model, D (mean, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th), D * (90th), and f (10th) were significantly lower in PCa than in BPH/prostatitis, while D (skewness), D * (kurtosis), and K (mean, 75th, 90th) were significantly higher in PCa than in BPH/prostatitis. For MEM, ADC (mean, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th) was significantly lower in PCa than in BPH/prostatitis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the IVIM-kurtosis model was higher than MEM, without significant differences ( z = 1.761, P = 0.0783). D (mean, 50th, 75th, 90th), D * (mean, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th), and f (skewness, kurtosis) correlated negatively with GS, while D (kurtosis), D * (skewness, kurtosis), f (mean, 75th, 90th), and K (mean, 75th, 90th) correlated positively with GS. The histogram parameters of ADC did not show correlations with GS. Conclusion The IVIM-kurtosis model has potential value in the differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH/prostatitis. IVIM-kurtosis histogram analysis may provide more information in the grading of PCa than MEM.

oncology