Abstract:Background: Distinguishing between prostatic cancer (PCa) and chronic prostatitis (CP) is sometimes challenging, and Gleason grading is strongly associated with prognosis in PCa. The continuous-time random-walk diffusion (CTRW) model has shown potential in distinguishing between PCa and CP as well as predicting Gleason grading. Purpose: This study aimed to quantify the CTRW parameters (α, β & Dm) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of PCa and CP tissues; and then assess the diagnostic value of CTRW and ADC parameters in differentiating CP from PCa and low-grade PCa from high-grade PCa lesions. Study type: Retrospective (retrospective analysis using prospective designed data). Population: Thirty-one PCa patients undergoing prostatectomy (mean age 74 years, range 64–91 years), and thirty CP patients undergoing prostate needle biopsies (mean age 68 years, range 46–79 years). Field strength/Sequence: MRI scans on a 3.0T scanner (uMR790, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China). DWI were acquired with 12 b-values (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 500, 800, 1200, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000 s/mm 2 ). Assessment: CTRW parameters and ADC were quantified in PCa and CP lesions. Statistical tests: The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences in CTRW parameters and ADC between PCa and CP, high-grade PCa, and low-grade PCa. Spearman's correlation of the pathologic grading group (GG) with CTRW parameters and ADC was evaluated. The usefulness of CTRW parameters, ADC, and their combinations (Dm, α and β; Dm, α, β, and ADC) to differentiate PCa from CP and high-grade PCa from low-grade PCa was determined by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Delong test was used to compare the differences among AUCs. Results: Significant differences were found for the CTRW parameters (α, Dm) between CP and PCa (all P<0.001), high-grade PCa, and low-grade PCa (α:P=0.024, Dm:P=0.021). GG is correlated with certain CTRW parameters and ADC(α:P<0.001,r=-0.795; Dm:P<0.001,r=-0.762;ADC:P<0.001,r=-0.790). Moreover, CTRW parameters (α, β, Dm) combined with ADC showed the best diagnostic efficacy for distinguishing between PCa and CP as well as predicting Gleason grading. The differences among AUCs of ADC, CTRW parameters and their combinations were not statistically significant (P=0.051–0.526). Conclusion: CTRW parameters α and Dm, as well as their combination were beneficial to distinguish between CA and PCa, low-grade PCa and high-grade PCa lesions, and CTRW parameters and ADC had comparable diagnostic performance.

DWI-associated entire-tumor histogram analysis for the differentiation of low-grade prostate cancer from intermediate–high-grade prostate cancer

[Stretched-Exponential and Mono-Exponential Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Assessing the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer: A Histogram Analysis].

Histogram Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiation of Pathologic Gleason Grade of Prostate Cancer

Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging

The correlation between diffusion weighted imaging with cervical cancer cell proliferation activity of PCNA and Ki-67

Whole-lesion Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Cervical Cancers with Different Differentiation

Differentiation of Prostate Cancer and Stromal Hyperplasia in the Transition Zone with Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Characterization of prostatic cancer lesion and gleason grade using a continuous-time random-walk diffusion model at high b-values

Comparison of MRS and DWI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Based on Sextant Analysis

Application of whole-volume apparent diffusion coefficient histogram in staging of rectal cancer

Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging

Assessment of histological differentiation in gastric cancers using whole-volume histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps.

Comparison of Utility of Histogram Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and R2*For Differentiation of Low-Grade from High-Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score

Value of MR diffusion weighted imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Diagnosis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Prostatic Central Gland Cancer

Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology

Assessment of histogram analysis in distinguishing between low-grade and high-grade brainstem glioma

Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Distribution and Cancer Grade in Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Quantitative Analysis of Multiparametric Prostate Mr Images: Differentiation Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue and Correlation with Gleason Score-A Computer-Aided Diagnosis Development Study

DWI in differential diagnosis of low T2 signal in peripheral zone of prostatitis and prostatic carcinoma