Abstract:PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death in US men. Clinical detection of elevated prostate-specific antigen level followed by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy is currently the standard practice for PCa diagnosis, although it has well-known limitations. Multi-parametric prostate MR imaging, including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (DW), and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images, has been shown promising for PCa diagnosis. We report here a validation study, across multi-parametric endorectal MR images acquired from scanners of two different manufacturers, of three previously-identified quantitative image features that were shown to be beneficial in PCa detection and Gleason score (GS) correlation. METHODS: Previously, we analyzed multi-parametric endorectal MR (T2-weighted, DW-MR, and DCE-MR) images (1.5T Phillips scanners) of 52 PCa patients who had undergone prostatectomy post MR imaging, and identified three image features that were effective in differentiating PCa from normal peripheral-zone (PZ) tissue regions of interest (ROIs): 10 percentile and average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and skewness of T2-weighted signal-intensity distribution. In our current study, we analyzed the multi-parametric endorectal MR images of 71 PCa patients imaged on 1.5T GE scanners who also had undergone prostatectomy post MR imaging. A radiologist and a pathologist identified 102 PCa and 59 normal PZ tissue ROIs via histology-MR correlation, and the pathologist provided tumor ROI-specific GS. We analyzed the same three image features, and their combination via linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and leave-one-ROI-out analysis, on the 71 GE cases. Effectiveness of the image features was characterized in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Effectiveness was also compared by training the LDA classifier with the Phillips cases and testing it with the GE cases, and vice versa. Furthermore, Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between the image features and GS. RESULTS: AUC values (± standard error) in differentiating PCa from normal PZ tissue ROIs of the 10 percentile ADC, average ADC, and T2-weighted skewness were 0.92±0.03, 0.89±0.03, and 0.86±0.04, respectively, for Philips cases; and 0.89±0.03, 0.87±0.03, and 0.72±0.04, respectively, for GE cases. AUC values of the three image features combined by LDA were 0.95±0.02 and 0.89±0.02, for the Phillips and GE cases, respectively. Training with the Phillips cases and testing with the GE cases yielded AUC value of 0.89±0.03, and 0.95±0.02 when the case sets were reversed. Spearman correlation between GS and the 10 percentile and average ADC values were -0.34 (p=0.008) and -0.30 (p=0.02), for the Phillips cases, and -0.27 (p=0.007) and -0.32 (p=0.001), for the GE cases, respectively. DISCUSSION: Visually, Phillips and GE MR images show clearly different characteristics, particularly with respect to certain image artifacts. These differences stem from differences in proprietary image-acquisition protocols. However, the similarities in the performances of the computer-extracted image features in differentiating PCa from normal PZ tissue ROIs suggest that these image features, which effectively characterize PCa, may be independent of MR scanners. The robustness of these image features across MR scanners is highly relevant as it suggests that these image features can potentially be used clinically, and serve as good candidates for development of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) methods. CONCLUSION: Quantitative multi-parametric endorectal MR image features, the 10 percentile and average ADC values, and the T2-weighted skewness, are effective across images obtained from Phillips and GE scanners in differentiating PCa from normal PZ tissue ROIs. The ADC features correlate moderately and negatively with GS. REFERENCES 1. Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology. 2011;261(1):46-66.

Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging and their machine‐learning‐based texture analysis for detection and assessment of prostate cancer severity at 3 T

Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology

The comparative study of in transition zone prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of new intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging models

A Study of T-2-Weighted Mr Image Texture Features and Diffusion-Weighted Mr Image Features for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined with DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.

Can intravoxel incoherent motion ( IVIM ) Replace the Conventional DWI Combined with DCE in Clinical Detection of Prostate Cancer ?

Using IVIM Parameters to Differentiate Prostate Cancer and Contralateral Normal Tissue through Fusion of MRI Images with Whole-Mount Pathology Specimen Images by Control Point Registration Method

Quantitative Analysis of Multiparametric Prostate Mr Images: Differentiation Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue and Correlation with Gleason Score-A Computer-Aided Diagnosis Development Study

Comparative Study of Diagnostic Value Between IVIM and DWI for Prostate Cancer at 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance

Validation of Quantitative Analysis of Multiparametric Prostate MR Images for Prostate Cancer Detection and Aggressiveness Assessment: a Cross-Imager Study.

Textured-Based Deep Learning in Prostate Cancer Classification with 3T Multiparametric MRI: Comparison with PI-RADS-Based Classification

Texture analysis based on PI-RADS 4/5-scored magnetic resonance images combined with machine learning to distinguish benign lesions from prostate cancer

Pancreatic Mass Characterization Using IVIM-DKI MRI and Machine Learning-Based Multi-Parametric Texture Analysis

Non-Gaussian Water Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

The Histogram Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-Kurtosis Model in the Diagnosis and Grading of Prostate Cancer—A Preliminary Study

Prostate Cancer: Feasibility and Preliminary Experience of a Diffusional Kurtosis Model for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Peripheral Zone Cancer

Validation of effectiveness of multi-parametric endorectal mr image features for prostate cancer detection and correlation with gleason score

Comparative Study of Monoexponential, Intravoxel Incoherent Motion, Kurtosis, and IVIM-Kurtosis Models for the Diagnosis and Aggressiveness Assessment of Prostate Cancer

The preliminary study of diffusion kurtosis imaging in prostate cancer

Synthetic Correlated Diffusion Imaging Hyperintensity Delineates Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

IVIM Parameters on MRI Could Predict ISUP Risk Groups of Prostate Cancers on Radical Prostatectomy