Abstract:Objective To compare the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) model with single-index DWI model parameters in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions,and to explore the correlation between the parameters and molecular subtypes and prognostic factors of breast cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed with inclusion of 64 cases of breast diseases from January 2016 to May 2017 in Shanghai First People's Hospital.The patients were pathologically confirmed and typed, 30 cases are malignant tumors and 34 cases are benign lesions. DKI and DWI were performed within 2 weeks before the pathological examination. Invasive ductal carcinoma of grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were revealed in 1, 7 and 13 cases respectively. Luminal A breast cancer was found in 10 cases, Luminal B breast cancer was diagnosed in 11 cases, HER-2 positive breast cancer was 4 cases and triple negative breast cancer was 5 cases. The expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), Progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 positive were found in 20, 14 and 15 cases respectively. Ki67 was highly expressed in 24 cases and low expression in 6 cases. All patients underwent both plain and enhanced mammography scanning. The kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD) and ADC value were measured. Prognosis analysis was performed according to the maximum diameter (>2 cm, ≤2 cm), vascular or neurological invasion (positive, negative), lymph node metastasis (positive, negative), ER (positive, negative), PR (positive, negative), HER-2 (positive, negative),Ki67 (positive, negative), pathological grade (grade Ⅰ+Ⅱ,Ⅲ). Two independent samples t test was used to compare DKI and DWI parameters between benign and malignant lesions. ROC analysis was performed for assessing the values of parameters in discriminating benign and malignant breast lesions. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used for the comparison of various prognostic factors or molecular subtypes.Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation of different prognostic factors and DKI and DWI parameters. Results The MK value of malignant group was higher than that of benign group,and the MD value and ADC value were lower than that of benign group (P<0.05). The area under the ROC for MK, MD and ADC were 0.897, 0.827 and 0.776, respectively. The area under the ROC was improved to 0.935 when three parameters were combined. The MK of ER positive group was higher than that of negative group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference of parameters among the other prognostic groups (all P>0.05). There was a low positive correlation between ER and MK (r= 0.417, P= 0.022). There was no correlation between the other prognostic factors and parameters (r=－0.086 to 0.313, all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the MD, MK and ADC values among the four different subtypes of breast cancer (all P>0.05). Conclusions MK, MD and ADC values can be used to discriminate benign and malignant breast tumors, among which MK value has the best diagnostic performance. There is a certain correlation between DKI model parameters and prognostic factors.

Whole-tumor texture model based on diffusion kurtosis imaging for assessing cervical cancer: a preliminary study

Texture analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating malignant from benign sinonasal lesions: added value to conventional imaging features

Can the Combination of DWI and T2WI Radiomics Improve the Diagnostic Efficiency of Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

T1 Mapping and Multimodel Diffusion- Weighted Imaging in the Assessment of Cervical Cancer: a Preliminary Study

A Study on Diffusion and Kurtosis Features of Cervical Cancer Based on Non-Gaussian Diffusion Weighted Model.

Radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: A preliminary study on histological grade evaluation

Comparative analysis of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating the histological grade of cervical squamous carcinoma

Quantitative Evaluation of Diffusion-Kurtosis Imaging for Grading Endometrial Carcinoma: a Comparative Study with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with diffusion kurtosis imaging: correlation between diffusion kurtosis parameters and tumor cellularity.

Value of non-Gaussian diffusion imaging with a fractional order calculus model combined with conventional MRI for differentiating histological types of cervical cancer

Whole Tumor Based Texture Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Imaging for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Prospective Study for Diffusion Model Comparison and Early Response Biomarker.

Whole-lesion histogram and texture analyses of breast lesions on inline quantitative DCE mapping with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE

The preliminary study of diffusion kurtosis imaging in prostate cancer

Whole-volume diffusion kurtosis MR imaging histogram analysis of non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with histopathology and degree of tumor differentiation

Diffusion-weighted and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Analysis of Microstructural Differences in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparative Study

Value of Whole-Lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) First-Order Statistics and Texture Features in Clinical Staging of Cervical Cancers.

Comparative Study of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Model and Diffusion Weighted Imaging Model in Diagnosisofbreastcancer

Evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions

Whole-volume diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance (MR) imaging histogram analysis of non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with histopathology and degree of tumor differentiation

Investigation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for discriminating tumors from inflammatory lesions after treatment for bladder cancer.

Whole-lesion Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Cervical Cancers with Different Differentiation