Application of diffusion kurtosis imaging and 18F-FDG PET in evaluating the subtype, stage and proliferation status of non-small cell lung cancer
Pengyang Feng,Zehua Shao,Bai Dong,Ting Fang,Zhun Huang,Ziqiang Li,Fangfang Fu,Yaping Wu,Wei Wei,Jianmin Yuan,Yang Yang,Zhe Wang,Meiyun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.989131
IF: 4.7
2022-10-01
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Background: Lung cancer has become one of the deadliest tumors in the world. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for approximately 80%-85% of all lung cancer cases. This study aimed to investigate the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and 2-[ 18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in differentiating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) and to evaluate the correlation of each parameter with stage and proliferative status Ki-67. Methods: Seventy-seven patients with lung lesions were prospectively scanned by hybrid 3.0-T chest 18 F-FDG PET/MR. Mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. The independent samples t test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare and analyze the differences in each parameter of SCC and AC. The diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with the DeLong test. A logistic regression analysis was used for the evaluation of independent predictors. Bootstrapping (1000 samples) was performed to establish a control model, and calibration curves and ROC curves were used to validate its performance. Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's correlation coefficient were calculated for correlation analysis. Results: The MK and ADC values of the AC group were significantly higher than those of the SCC group (all P< 0.05), and the SUVmax, MTV, and TLG values of the SCC group were significantly higher than those of the AC group (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the MD value between the two groups. Moreover, MK, SUVmax, TLG and MTV were independent predictors of the NSCLC subtype, and the combination of these parameters had an optimal diagnostic efficacy (AUC, 0.876; sensitivity, 86.27%; specificity, 80.77%), which was significantly better than that of MK (AUC = 0.758, z = 2.554, P = 0.011), ADC (AUC = 0.679, z = 2.322, P = 0.020), SUVmax (AUC = 0.740, z = 2.584, P = 0.010), MTV (AUC = 0.715, z = 2.530, P = 0.011) or TLG (AUC = 0.716, z = 2.799, P = 0.005). The ROC curve showed that the validation model had high accuracy in identifying AC and SCC (AUC, 0.844; 95% CI, 0.785-0.885);. The SUVmax value was weakly positively correlated with the Ki-67 index (r = 0.340, P< 0.05), the ADC and MD values were weakly negatively correlated with the Ki-67 index (r = -0.256, -0.282, P< 0.05), and the MTV and TLG values were weakly positively correlated with NSCLC stage (r = 0.342, 0.337, P< 0.05). Conclusion: DKI, DWI and 18 F-FDG PET are all effective methods for assessing the NSCLC subtype, and some parameters are correlated with stage and proliferation status.
oncology