Abstract:Objective To compare the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) model with single-index DWI model parameters in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions,and to explore the correlation between the parameters and molecular subtypes and prognostic factors of breast cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed with inclusion of 64 cases of breast diseases from January 2016 to May 2017 in Shanghai First People's Hospital.The patients were pathologically confirmed and typed, 30 cases are malignant tumors and 34 cases are benign lesions. DKI and DWI were performed within 2 weeks before the pathological examination. Invasive ductal carcinoma of grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were revealed in 1, 7 and 13 cases respectively. Luminal A breast cancer was found in 10 cases, Luminal B breast cancer was diagnosed in 11 cases, HER-2 positive breast cancer was 4 cases and triple negative breast cancer was 5 cases. The expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), Progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 positive were found in 20, 14 and 15 cases respectively. Ki67 was highly expressed in 24 cases and low expression in 6 cases. All patients underwent both plain and enhanced mammography scanning. The kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD) and ADC value were measured. Prognosis analysis was performed according to the maximum diameter (>2 cm, ≤2 cm), vascular or neurological invasion (positive, negative), lymph node metastasis (positive, negative), ER (positive, negative), PR (positive, negative), HER-2 (positive, negative),Ki67 (positive, negative), pathological grade (grade Ⅰ+Ⅱ,Ⅲ). Two independent samples t test was used to compare DKI and DWI parameters between benign and malignant lesions. ROC analysis was performed for assessing the values of parameters in discriminating benign and malignant breast lesions. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used for the comparison of various prognostic factors or molecular subtypes.Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation of different prognostic factors and DKI and DWI parameters. Results The MK value of malignant group was higher than that of benign group,and the MD value and ADC value were lower than that of benign group (P<0.05). The area under the ROC for MK, MD and ADC were 0.897, 0.827 and 0.776, respectively. The area under the ROC was improved to 0.935 when three parameters were combined. The MK of ER positive group was higher than that of negative group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference of parameters among the other prognostic groups (all P>0.05). There was a low positive correlation between ER and MK (r= 0.417, P= 0.022). There was no correlation between the other prognostic factors and parameters (r=－0.086 to 0.313, all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the MD, MK and ADC values among the four different subtypes of breast cancer (all P>0.05). Conclusions MK, MD and ADC values can be used to discriminate benign and malignant breast tumors, among which MK value has the best diagnostic performance. There is a certain correlation between DKI model parameters and prognostic factors.

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Differs Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-Grade Glioma and is Correlated with the Diverse Nuclear-to-cytoplasmic Ratio: a Histopathologic, Biopsy-Based Study

DKI Can Distinguish High-Grade Gliomas from IDH1 -Mutant Low-Grade Gliomas and Correlate with Their Different Nuclear-to-cytoplasm Ratio: a Localized Biopsy-Based Study

Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiating between high-grade glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with diffusion kurtosis imaging: correlation between diffusion kurtosis parameters and tumor cellularity.

Whole-volume diffusion kurtosis MR imaging histogram analysis of non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with histopathology and degree of tumor differentiation

Whole-volume diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance (MR) imaging histogram analysis of non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with histopathology and degree of tumor differentiation

MR Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Predicts Malignant Potential and the Histological Type of Meningioma.

Breast Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Clinical-Pathologic Factors.

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study of Rectal Adenocarcinoma Associated with Histopathologic Prognostic Factors: Preliminary Findings.

Evaluation of Cerebral Glioma Using 3T Diffusion Kurtosis Tensor Imaging and the Relationship Between Diffusion Kurtosis Metrics and Tumor Cellularity

Two Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Post-Processing Methods for Differentiating Glioma Grades, IDH Mutation Statuses, and Heterogeneity

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Can Efficiently Assess the Glioma Grade and Cellular Proliferation

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging to Assess Correlations with Clinicopathologic Factors for Bladder Cancer: a Comparison Between the Multi-B Value Method and the Tensor Method

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion in Differentiating Nasal Malignancies

The Role of Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Invasive Breast Cancer Classification and Its Correlation with Prognostic Factors: A Prospective Study of Primarily Advanced Stage Cancers

Diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating gliomas: different region of interest selection methods on time efficiency, measurement repeatability, and diagnostic ability

Efficacy of MR Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Differentiating Low-Grade from High-Grade Glioma Before Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Radiomics Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: Distinguishing Between Glioblastoma and Single Brain Metastasis

Correlation Between Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Ki-67 Expression

Survival Prediction Analysis in Glioblastoma With Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

Comparative Study of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Model and Diffusion Weighted Imaging Model in Diagnosisofbreastcancer