Abstract:Increasing computational power and improving deep learning methods have made computer vision technologies pervasively common in urban environments. Their applications in policing, traffic management, and documenting public spaces are increasingly common (Ridgeway 2018, Coifman et al. 1998, Sun et al. 2020). Despite the often-discussed biases in the algorithms' training and unequally borne benefits (Khosla et al. 2012), almost all applications similarly reduce urban experiences to simplistic, reductive, and mechanistic measures. There is a lack of context, depth, and specificity in these practices that enables semantic knowledge or analysis within urban contexts, especially within the context of using and occupying urban space. This paper will critique existing uses of artificial intelligence and computer vision in urban practices to propose a new framework for understanding people, action, and public space. This paper revisits Geertz's (1973) use of thick descriptions in generating interpretive theories of culture and activity and uses this lens to establish a framework to approach evaluating the varied uses of computer vision technologies that weigh meaning. By discussing cases of implemented examples of urban computer vision—from LinkNYC and Numina's urban measurements to the Detroit Police's use of DataWorks Plus's facial recognition technology—it proposes a framework for evaluating the thickness of the algorithm's conclusions against the computational method's complexity required to produce that outcome. Further, we discuss how the framework's positioning may differ (and conflict) between different users of the technology, from engineer to urban planner and policymaker, to citizen. This paper also discusses how the current use and training of deep learning algorithms and how this process limits semantic learning and proposes three potential methodologies toward gaining a more contextually specific, urban-semantic, description of urban space relevant to urbanists. This paper contributes to the critical conversations regarding the proliferation of artificial intelligence by challenging the current applications of these technologies in the urban environment by highlighting their failures within this context while also proposing an evolution of these algorithms that may ultimately make them sensitive and useful within this spatial and cultural milieu.

Communication of Social Agents and the Digital City - A Semiotic Perspective

VIRTUAL-PHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP OF FUTURE URBAN SPACE:BASED ON THE EVOLUTION OF TECHNOLOGY

Discussion on Research "Digital City"

Preliminary Study on ‘the Digital City'

System and Structure of the Digital City

ConnectiCity, augmented perception of the city

Visual Communication in Urban Design and Planning: The Impact of Mediatisation(s) on the Construction of Urban Futures

A Study on the Key Techniques of the Digital City and Its 3D Re-Appearing

"Shanghai's Remaking": A Study of Chinese Cities from the Perspective of Communication

The Semiotics of Cyberculture: the Example of Artistic Discourse

Digital city diplomacy and international cities networks: Collaboration and city branding strategies around climate issues

City as living organism

SEMIOTICS OF SOCIAL MEMORY IN URBAN SPACE: THE CASE OF VOLGOGRAD (STALINGRAD)

Public Space at the “Palm of a Hand”: Perceptions of Urban Projects Through Digital Media

Digital Existence - the Modern Way to Be

Place-oriented digital agency: Residents' use of digital means to enhance neighbourhood change

Urban-semantic computer vision: a framework for contextual understanding of people in urban spaces

SymbioCity: Smart cities for smarter networks

THE DATACRACY THREAT OF SMART CITIES

Translating cities: the use of digital technologies in urban environments

Digital transformation of a big city as an object of sociological analysis