Abstract:Abstract Over the past few decades, cities have repeatedly demonstrated high levels of ambition with regard to climate action. Global environmental governance has been marked by a proliferation of policy actions taken by local governments around the world to demonstrate their potential to advance climate change mitigation and adaptation. Leading ‘by example’ and demonstrating the extent of action that it is possible to deliver, cities have aspired to raise the ambition of national and international climate governance and put action into practice via a growing number of ‘climate change experiments’ delivered on the ground. Yet accounts of the potential of cities in global environmental governance have often stopped short of a systematic valuation of the nature and impact of the networked dimension of this action. This article addresses this by assessing the nature, and challenges faced by, urban climate governance in the post‐Paris era, focusing on the ‘experimentation’ undertaken in cities and the city networks shaping this type of governance. First, we unpack the concept of ‘urban climate change experimentation’, the ways in which it is networked, and the forces driving it. In the second and third parts of the article, we discuss two main pitfalls of networked urban experimentation in its current form, focusing on issues of scaling experiments and the nature of experimentation. We call for increased attention to ‘scaling up’ experiments beyond urban levels of governance, and to transformative experimentation with governance and politics by and in cities. Finally, we consider how these pitfalls allow us to weigh the potential of urban climate ambition, and consider the pathways available for supporting urban climate change experimentation.While the analytical conflation of sub‐state and non‐state actors is understandable in the context of the traditional focus of global governance research on nation states, we would like to gently point out that to scholars working on urban governance, equating a city with a non‐state actor such as a multinational corporation is incomprehensible and analytically useless. To push forward the research agenda, future work on climate governance should make clear distinctions between local governments and other actors from the outset.

Digital city diplomacy and international cities networks: Collaboration and city branding strategies around climate issues

The Smart City as Global Discourse: Storylines and Critical Junctures across 27 Cities

Navigating the Digital Age: City Branding in the Era of Social Media and Digital Transformation

Subsistence over symbolism: the role of transnational municipal networks on cities’ climate policy innovation and adoption

Interpreting digital governance at the municipal level: Evidence from smart city projects in Belgium

An economic geography perspective on city diplomacy

Internal and External Collaborative Shaping: The Role of Official Information and Online Communities in Shaping a City's Image

Place-oriented digital agency: Residents' use of digital means to enhance neighbourhood change

Between Club Diplomacy and Network Diplomacy: Exploring the Diplomatic Role of Cities in China Since 2012

New communicative challenges: Dundee, place branding and the reconstruction of a city image

Networking Cities after Paris: Weighing the Ambition of Urban Climate Change Experimentation

A Network-Based Approach to Model the Development of City Branding in China

Government and Social Media: A Case Study of 31 Informational World Cities

The image of the City on social media: A comparative study using “Big Data” and “Small Data” methods in the Tri-City Region in Poland

Understanding how city networks are leveraging climate action: experimentation through C40

Place Branding for Smart Cities and Smart Tourism Destinations: Do They Communicate Their Smartness?

Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance

Communication of Social Agents and the Digital City - A Semiotic Perspective

Governing from the middle: the C40 Cities Leadership Group

Les strates de la smart city

Situating C40 in the Evolution of Networked Urban Climate Governance