Abstract:Suthasinee Sinawat, 1 Sukita Jumpawong, 1 Tanapat Ratanapakorn, 1 Chavakij Bhoomibunchoo, 1 Yosanan Yospaiboon, 1 Supat Sinawat 2 1 KKU Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand; 2 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand Correspondence: Suthasinee Sinawat; Yosanan Yospaiboon KKU Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mittraparb Highway, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand Tel +66 43 348383 Email ssuthasinee@kku.ac.th; yyosanan@gmail.com Purpose: To evaluate anatomical and visual outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP) in large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Predictive factors also formed part of the study. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of medical charts and optical coherence tomography images of patients with large idiopathic FTMH (≥ 400 μm) was conducted. Results: One hundred and fifty-eight eyes of 155 patients with a mean age of 62.94± 7.50 years were included in the study. Mean preoperative visual acuity (VA) was 1.26± 0.36 logMAR. Mean preoperative minimum linear diameter (MLD) and basal linear diameter (BLD) were 644.89± 136.85 μm and 1208.11± 307.14 μm, respectively. At 12 weeks postoperative follow-up, FTMH closure rate was 61.39% and mean postoperative BCVA was 0.92± 0.36 logMAR. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed the anatomical outcome was significantly associated with BLD ≤ 1200 μm, preoperative vitreomacular interface (VMI) disorder and extended ILMP (a radius of 2 disc diameters), whereas only postoperative ellipsoid loss ≤ 500 μm was significantly associated with visual outcome. In subgroup analyses, the large FTMH group (400– 600 μm) had significantly better results in closure rate (70.97% vs 55.21%, P = 0.047) and visual results ( P = 0.031) than the extra-large FTMH group (> 600 μm). Conclusion: PPV with conventional ILMP provided relatively low closure rate in large FTMH. Surgical success was significantly associated with BLD ≤ 1200 μm, no preoperative VMI abnormality, extended ILMP and postoperative ellipsoid defect ≤ 500 μm. Therefore, we suggest the extended ILMP if conventional ILMP technique is used. The large FTMH group had significantly better surgical outcomes than the extra-large group, so there is a need for reclassification of large FTMH. Keywords: full-thickness macular hole, internal limiting membrane peeling, conventional, complete flap, large macular hole

Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling

Clinical Outcomes of Treatment of Macular Hole by Vitrectomy with Internal-Limiting Membrane Peeling

Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap

ANATOMICAL AND VISUAL OUTCOMES OF INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE WITHOUT RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Preliminary Retrospective Study

Microstructural and microperimetric comparison of internal limiting membrane peeling and insertion in large idiopathic macular hole

Comment on: Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap

Macular Hole Surgery and Retinal Tectonics: The Impact of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Size on Tangential Retinal Displacement

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for <400 μm Macular Hole: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with coexisting macular hole: a comparison of vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peeling

Comparison of efficacy between internal limiting membrane peeling and internal limiting membrane insertion for idiopathic macular hole

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Visual Outcomes after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling vs. Flap in the Closure of Full Thickness Macular Holes

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes Induces Only Structural Remodeling without Functional Impairment Over 12 Years

Comparison of Different Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Sizes for Idiopathic Macular Holes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes

Efficacy of Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment of Large Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Holes

Vitrectomy combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap insertion or single-layered flap covering technique for highly myopic macular holes with macular retinoschisis

RETINAL MIGRATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME AFTER HEMI-TEMPORAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR MACULAR HOLE: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Perifoveal Microvascular Changes following Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Surgery for Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole

Single-Layer Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Versus Conventional Peel for Small- or Medium-Sized Full-Thickness Macular Holes

Comparision of the clinical effects on vitrectomy with or without fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling