Abstract:Background: Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of macular holes (MHs). However, there is a possibility of poor postoperative anatomical closure with conventional ILM peeling for MHs larger than 400 mu m. Therefore, a novel inverted ILM flap technique was developed for such cases. Objectives: This meta-analysis study was performed to evaluate and compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of the inverted ILM flap technique and ILM peeling in large MHs. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The trial eligibility and risk of bias were assessed according to Cochrane review methods. The primary outcome measures included MH closure rate and postoperative visual acuity (VA). Subgroup analysis of postoperative VA based on follow-up time was also conducted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Five RCTs with a total of 155 eyes in the inverted ILM flap group and 161 eyes in the ILM peeling group were included in this meta-analysis. Statistical meta-analysis revealed that the overall MH closure rate in the inverted ILM flap group was significantly higher than that in the ILM peeling group (OR = 3.10; 95% CI: 1.25-7.66; p = 0.01). The postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than the ILM peeling group (WMD = -0.14; 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.07; p = 0.0002). The subgroup meta-analysis indicated that the postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than the ILM peeling group (WMD = -0.17; 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.08; p = 0.0004) at the 3-month follow-up. However, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups at the 6-month follow-up (WMD = -0.09; 95% CI: -0.20 to 0.02; p = 0.10). Conclusions: Vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique showed a higher anatomical closure rate as well as visual gain - although only in the short term as no difference in visual recovery was found at the 6-month follow-up - than did ILM peeling in large MHs. The inverted ILM flap technique should be considered as a preferred and routine procedure for the treatment of patients with MHs larger than 400 mu m. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with coexisting macular hole: a comparison of vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peeling

Clinical Outcomes of Treatment of Macular Hole by Vitrectomy with Internal-Limiting Membrane Peeling

Primary Silicone Oil Tamponade and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Retinal Detachment Due to Macular Hole in Highly Myopic Eyes with Chorioretinal Atrophy

ANATOMICAL AND VISUAL OUTCOMES OF INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE WITHOUT RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Preliminary Retrospective Study

Comparison Of The Internal Limiting Membrane Insertion Technique And The Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique With Vitrectomy To Treat Macular Hole-Associated Retinal Detachment

Comparison of efficacy between internal limiting membrane peeling and internal limiting membrane insertion for idiopathic macular hole

Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling

Visual Outcomes after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling vs. Flap in the Closure of Full Thickness Macular Holes

Internal limiting membrane peeling in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis

Comparison of stereopsis and foveal microstructure after internal limiting membrane peeling and inverted internal limiting membrane flap techniques in patients with macular hole

Microstructural and microperimetric comparison of internal limiting membrane peeling and insertion in large idiopathic macular hole

Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes

Vitrectomy combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap insertion or single-layered flap covering technique for highly myopic macular holes with macular retinoschisis

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

SEQUENTIAL PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY AND INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENTS WITH PERIPHERAL BREAKS AND CONCOMITANT NONCAUSATIVE MACULAR HOLE IN NONHIGHLY MYOPIC PATIENTS

Vitrectomy Outcomes in Eyes with High Myopic Macular Hole Without Retinal Detachment.

Inverted multi-layer internal limiting membrane flap for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for <400 μm Macular Hole: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Surgical outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment coexisting with a macular hole

RETINAL MIGRATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME AFTER HEMI-TEMPORAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR MACULAR HOLE: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial

A clinical study of vitrectomy for traumatic macular hole