Abstract:Objective:To explore the outcome of extended internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling combined with releasing the edge technique for primary failed idiopathic macular hole (IMH) surgery.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed. The data of 18 eyes of 18 IMH patients who were failed in primary surgery from August 2013 to June 2019 in Peking University People’s Hospital were enrolled in the study. Among them, 5 patients were males and 13 patients were females. The average age was 66.2±6.4 years. The BCVA were measured by ETDRS charts. The minimum macular hole size was measured on OCT B-scan image. The average preoperative BCVA and minimum macular hole size of primary surgery was 32.6±13.1 letters and 621.1±161.8 μm. The average preoperative BCVA and minimum macular hole size of second surgery was 34.4±12.3 letters and 499.0±148.6 μm. Average interval period of first and second surgery was 3.4±1.3 weeks. The surgical technique used in the reoperation included the extended ILM peeling combined with releasing the MH edges. The extended ILM peeling area ranged from 4 DD diameter to vascular arcades. The technique of releasing the macular hole edges was performed by using a silicone soft-tip extrusion cannula, with which tapping the edges softly or aspirated vacuum the edges concentricly. The average follow-up was 9.3±5.2 months. The clear OCT image can be obtained for confirming MH closure which was considered as the closure time in the first time. The comparison of preoperative and postoperative was performed by paired t-test. Results:The closure rate of second surgery was 94.4% (17/18), and average closure time was 2.1±1.0 weeks. Only 1 eye experienced the second surgical failure and received the third surgery to achieved macular hole closure. Average final follow-up BCVA was 51.5±13.0 ETDRS letters, with average improvement of 18.9 ETDRS letters (>3 lines) compared with preoperative BCVA of primary surgery. There was significantly statistical difference between the final BCVA and preoperative BCVA ( t=5.412, P <0.001). Eleven patients (61.1%) had 3 lines BCVA improvement, 15 patients (83.3%) had more than 1 line improvement, and 3 patients (16.7%) had on improvement. The final BCVA of patients significantly improved compared with preoperative BCVA of the second surgery ( t=7.595, P<0.001), with average improvement of 17.1±9.5 letters. Conclusion:The extended ILM peeling combined with releasing macular hole edges technique is effective to improve the closure rate and BCVA of primary failed IMH eyes.

Aspirin in the prevention of painful intravenous injection of disoprofol (ICI 35,868) and diazepam (Valium)

Clinical Outcomes of Treatment of Macular Hole by Vitrectomy with Internal-Limiting Membrane Peeling

Basics of compounding: application of the United States pharmacopeia bacterial endotoxins test to compounded sterile preparations.

Primary Silicone Oil Tamponade and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Retinal Detachment Due to Macular Hole in Highly Myopic Eyes with Chorioretinal Atrophy

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for <400 μm Macular Hole: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Inverted ILM flap technique versus conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic large macular holes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparison of efficacy between internal limiting membrane peeling and internal limiting membrane insertion for idiopathic macular hole

Single-Layer Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Versus Conventional Peel for Small- or Medium-Sized Full-Thickness Macular Holes

The Role of Internal Limiting Membrane Flap for Highly Myopic Macular Hole Retinal Detachment: Improving the Closure Rate but Leading to Excessive Gliosis

Visual Outcomes after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling vs. Flap in the Closure of Full Thickness Macular Holes

Comparison Of The Internal Limiting Membrane Insertion Technique And The Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique With Vitrectomy To Treat Macular Hole-Associated Retinal Detachment

Vitrectomy combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap insertion or single-layered flap covering technique for highly myopic macular holes with macular retinoschisis

Corticosteroid bioavailability assays. Correlation with a clinical study.

Comparison of the use of internal limiting membrane flaps versus conventional ILM peeling on post-operative anatomical and visual outcomes in large macular holes

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Inverted Flap Technique in Macular Hole: Postoperative Metamorphopsia and Optical Coherence Tomography

Clinical Observation of Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Macular Hole after Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap in Patients with Idiopathic Macular

Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes

Efficacy of inverted inner limiting membrane flap technique for macular holes of ≤400 μm: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Extended internal limiting membrane peeling combined with releasing the edge for primary failed idiopathic macular hole surgery

AS 655 ASL R 2443 2009 Reproductive Biology of Pigs