Racial Differences in Patterns of Goal Concordant and Goal Discordant Care Among Older Adults with Serious Illness (RP123)

Kimberly S. Johnson,Deborah B. Ejem,Anupama Gangavati,Ramona Rhodes,Nadine Barrett,Ronit Elk,Alyssa Platt,Maren Olsen,Tammie Quest
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.466
IF: 5.576
2024-04-20
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Abstract:Outcomes 1. Participants will be able to describe Black-White differences in preferences for care among community-dwelling older adults with serious illness. 2. Participants will be able to describe rates of patient-reported goal concordant care and racial differences in patterns of goal discordant care among community-dwelling older adults with serious illness. Key Message Goal concordant care rates were similar for Black and White patients. Among those receiving goal discordant care, a greater proportion of Black patients reported receiving care to relieve pain even if it means not living as long despite preferring care to extend life even if it means having more pain. Importance Goal-concordant care (GCC) is a quality measure in palliative care. Objective(s) Examine racial differences in GCC. Scientific Methods Utilized Using baseline data from EQUAL ACP, a trial to improve ACP in patients 65+ with serious illness, we defined GCC as the same response and goal-discordant care (GDC) as different responses to 2 questions: (1) If you had to make a choice today, what would you prefer? (2) What best describes the care you are receiving? Responses were: (a) care focused on extending life even if it means having more pain and discomfort; (b) care focused on relieving pain and discomfort even if that means not living as long. We used chi square tests and logistic regression to examine predictors of GCC. Results Of 797 patients, 53.8% were Black; 46.2% were White. Mean age was 74.9. Black patients were more likely to report poor/fair health (47.2% vs 33.2%, p< 0.001) and to prefer care to extend life even if it means having more pain (47.8% vs. 39.1%, p<.0001). Rates of GCC (N=546) were similar by race (79.2% vs 79.0%). In logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, education and self-rated health, race was not associated with GCC. However, among those receiving GDC, Black patients were more likely to prefer care to extend life even if it means having more pain but report receiving care to relieve pain even if it means not living as long (36.7% vs. 7.4%, p< 0.001). Among those preferring care to extend life, 11.9% of Black vs. 3.2% of White patients received GDC (p=0.007). Conclusion(s) Rates of GCC were similar by race; however, GDC, with preferences for care focused on extending life but receipt of care focused on relieving pain even if it means not living as long, was more common for Black patients. Impact Future research should identify drivers of racial differences in GDC. Keywords Palliative care in chronic, non-malignant illness/Cultural diversity
medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?