Design Considerations for Building a Scalable Digital Version of a Multi-player Educational Board Game for a MOOC in Logistics and Transportation

H. Lukosch,Shalini Kurapati,Geertje Bekebrede,S. Tiemersma,Daan Groen,Linda van Veen,A. Verbraeck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_15

2016-12-05

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Advance care planning as perceived by marginalized populations: Willing to engage and facing obstacles

Shigeko Izumi,Ellen Garcia,Andrew Kualaau,Danetta E. Sloan,Susan DeSanto-Madeya,Carey Candrian,Elizabeth Anderson,Justin Sanders,Shigeko (Seiko) Izumi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301426

IF: 3.7

2024-04-02

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Health disparities exist in end-of-life (EOL) care. Individuals and communities that are marginalized due to their race, ethnicity, income, geographic location, language, or cultural background experience systemic barriers to access and receive lower quality EOL care. Advance care planning (ACP) prepares patients and their caregivers for EOL decision-making for the purpose of promoting high-quality EOL care. Low engagement in ACP among marginalized populations is thought to have contributed to disparity in EOL care. To advance health equity and deliver care that aligns with the goals and values of each individual, there is a need to improve ACP for marginalized populations. To describe how patients from marginalized populations experience and perceive ACP. We used an interpretive phenomenological approach with semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited from four primary care clinics and one nursing home in a US Pacific Northwest city. Thirty patients from marginalized populations with serious illness participated in individual interviews between January and December 2021. Participants were asked to describe their experiences and perceptions about ACP during the interviews. The mean age of 30 participants was 69.5; 19 (63%) were women; 12 (40%) identified as Asian/Pacific Islanders, 10 (33%) as Black; and 9 (30%) were non-native English speakers. Our three key findings were: 1) patients from marginalized populations are willing to engage in ACP; 2) there were multiple obstacles to engaging in ACP; and 3) meaningful ACP conversations could happen when clinicians listen. Although participants from marginalized populations were willing to engage in ACP, a fragmented and restrictive healthcare system and clinicians' biased behaviors or lack of interest in knowing their patients were obstacles. Participants who felt their clinicians took time and listened were encouraged to engage in ACP. Patients from marginalized populations are willing to engage in ACP conversations despite a common belief otherwise. However, obstacles to meaningful ACP conversations with healthcare providers exist. Clinicians need to be aware of these obstacles and listen to build trust and engage marginalized patients in mutually meaningful ACP conversations.

multidisciplinary sciences
ACP Conversations with Chinese and South Asian Patients: Physicians’ Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitating Factors

Avantika Vashisht,Gloria Gutman,Taranjot Kaur

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.691

2023-12-01

Canadian Geriatrics Journal

Abstract:Introduction/Objective Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions are infrequently conducted with physicians, even fewer among minorities. We explored physicians’ experiences in engaging Chinese (CH) and South Asian (SA) patients in ACP conversations to understand initiation and participation patterns, topics covered, and barriers and facilitating factors. Method Twenty-two physicians with 15%+ SA patients aged 55+ and 19 with 15%+ CH patients aged 55+ were interviewed. Results SA- and CH-serving physicians described similar initiation patterns, cultural context, and need for standardized ACP routines. However, the SA-serving physicians described greater involvement of family members, while CH-serving physicians described more communication barriers and family members’ desire to hide the diagnosis from patients. Conclusion Cultural taboos surrounding discussion around death and dying appear to influence CH older adults and families strongly. Lack of familiarity with ACP amongst the SA population accounts more for their limited engagement in ACP discussions.
Achieving goal‐concordant care: Formal and informal advance care planning for White, Black, and Hispanic older adults

Rachel A. Lenko,Geoffrey J. Hoffman,Sheria G. Robinson‐Lane,Maria J. Silveira,Terri Voepel‐Lewis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18971

2024-05-20

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract:Introduction Advance care planning (ACP) aims to ensure that patients receive goal‐concordant care (GCC), which is especially important for racially or ethnically minoritized populations at greater risk of poor end‐of‐life outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of advance directives (i.e., formal ACP) or goals‐of‐care conversations (i.e., informal ACP) on such care. This study aimed to examine the relationship between each of formal and informal ACP and goal‐concordant end‐of‐life care among older Americans and to determine whether their impact differed between individuals identified as White, Black, or Hispanic. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2012–2018 data from the biennial Health and Retirement Study. We examined the relationships of interest using two, separate multivariable logistic regression models. Model 1 regressed a proxy report of GCC on formal and informal ACP and sociodemographic and health‐related covariates. Model 2 added interaction terms between race/ethnicity and the two types of ACP. Results Our sample included 2048 older adults. There were differences in the proportions of White, Black, and Hispanic decedents who received GCC (83.1%, 75.3%, and 71.3%, respectively, p

geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
The Effect of Pelargonium endlicherianum Fenzl. root extracts on formation of nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activities.

Gökçe Şeker Karatoprak,Gamze Aydin,B. Altinsoy,C. Altinkaynak,M. Koşar,I. Ocsoy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.10.019

IF: 3.705

2017-02-01

Enzyme and Microbial Technology

Abstract:
What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review

Ryan D. McMahan,Susan E. Hickman,Rebecca L. Sudore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08579-5

IF: 5.7

2024-01-04

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:Advance care planning (ACP) has been recognized as crucial by patients, families, and clinicians; however, different definitions and measurements have led to inconsistencies in practice and mixed evidence in the literature. This narrative review explores ACP's evolution, innovations, and outcomes using thematic analysis to synthesize data from randomized controlled trials, reviews, and editorials. Key findings include (1) ACP has evolved over the past several decades from a sole focus on code status and advance directive (AD) forms to a continuum of care planning over the life course focused on tailored preparation for patients and surrogate decision-makers and (2) ACP measurement has evolved from traditional outcome metrics, such as AD completion, to a comprehensive outcomes framework that includes behavior change theory, systems, implementation science, and a focus on surrogate outcomes. Since the recent development of an ACP consensus definition and outcomes framework, high-quality trials have reported mainly positive outcomes for interventions, especially for surrogates, which aligns with the patient desire to relieve decision-making burden for loved ones. Additionally, measurement of "clinically meaningful" ACP information, including documented goals of care discussions, is increasingly being integrated into electronic health records (EHR), and emerging, real-time assessments and natural language processing are enhancing ACP evaluation. To make things easier for patients, families, and care teams, clinicians and researchers can use and disseminate these evolved definitions; provide patients validated, easy-to-use tools that prime patients for conversations and decrease health disparities; use easy-to-access clinician training and simple scripts for interdisciplinary team members; and document patients' values and preferences in the medical record to capture clinically meaningful ACP so this information is available at the point of care. Future efforts should focus on efficient implementation, expanded reimbursement options, and seamless integration of EHR documentation to ensure ACP's continued evolution to better serve patients and their care partners.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
Home Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients at Risk for Becoming Incapacitated With No Evident Advance Directives or Surrogates

Aviv Y Landau,Chinmayi Venkatram,Jiyoun Song,Maxim Topaz,Robert Klitzman,Jingjing Shang,Patricia Stone,Margaret McDonald,Bevin Cohen,Aviv Y. Landau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/njh.0000000000000998

2024-03-07

Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing

Abstract:Advance care planning is important and timely for patients receiving home health services; however, opportunities to facilitate awareness and engagement in this setting are often missed. This qualitative descriptive study elicited perspectives of home health nurses and social workers regarding barriers and facilitators to creating advance care plans in home health settings, with particular attention to patients with few familial or social contacts who can serve as surrogate decision-makers. We interviewed 15 clinicians employed in a large New York City–based home care agency in 2021-2022. Participants reported a multitude of barriers to supporting patients with advance care planning at the provider level (eg, lack of time and professional education, deferment, discomfort), patient level (lack of knowledge, mistrust, inadequate support, deferment, language barriers), and system level (eg, discontinuity of care, variations in advance care planning documents, legal concerns, lack of institutional protocols and centralized information). Participants noted that greater socialization and connection to existing educational resources regarding the intended purpose, scope, and applicability of advance directives could benefit home care patients.

nursing
Indole hydrazides as potential monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

T. Nogrady,L. Morris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/JM00321A052

IF: 8.039

1966-05-01

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract:
Community Health Care Workers Empowering Advance Care Planning

Erik K. Fromme

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0375

IF: 33.006

2024-07-20

JAMA Oncology

Abstract:Advance care planning (ACP) has undergone criticism for a paucity of evidence that it improves the quality of care, decision-making, or the experience of the patient, their family, and the clinician at the end of life. After so much effort for admittedly limited results, why do clinicians, patients, their families, investigators, health care administrators, and policymakers keep trying to make ACP bear fruit? Originally, ACP arose from an ethical obligation to ensure patients have a voice in their care. As we become increasingly aware of systemic racism and inequities in health care, that obligation seems more pressing than ever. We should keep aiming for ACP, but how?

oncology
Internal Medicine Resident Barriers to Advance Care Planning in the Primary Care Continuity Clinic

Nicole Dussault,Elissa Nickolopoulos,Katherine Henderson,Patrick Hemming,Alex Cho,Jessica E Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231154606

2023-02-02

Abstract:American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Ahead of Print. Background: While primary care providers regularly engage in Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations, it is not well known what challenges resident physicians face to achieving this core competency. Objectives: We aimed to assess resident perceptions of barriers and potential interventions to outpatient ACP. Methods: We distributed an electronic survey to Internal Medicine and Medicine-Psychiatry residents at our institution in 2022. Questions addressed outpatient ACP barriers and potential interventions in several domains: structural issues, personal knowledge, and communication skills. We reported results using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, comparing responses by residency year (interns vs upperyears). Likert-scale responses were dichotomized to a "not at all or slightly" vs "moderate or extreme" barrier or helpful intervention. Results: Of 149 residents, 71 completed the survey (48%). Highest scoring barriers were structural, including 1) lack of clinic time (99%), 2) need to prioritize other medical problems (94%), and 3) lack of patient continuity (62%). Highest scoring interventions included the ability to schedule dedicated ACP visits with themselves (96%) or another clinician (82%). Interns were statistically significantly less confident in their ability to conduct ACP, and more likely to report lack of knowledge (i.e., not understanding ACP, patient prognosis, or how to complete paperwork, P < .05). Conclusions: Residents report significant structural barriers to outpatient ACP, including limitations in time, continuity, and competing medical priorities, that may warrant greater program attention to interventions such as clinic schedules and work-flow. Additional trainings may be most beneficial if targeted to the beginning of intern year.
Culture Differences in Advance Care Planning and Implications for Social Work Practice

Jung-Hwa Ha,Changsook Lee,Jennifer Yoo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.071

2021-12-01

Innovation in Aging

Abstract:Abstract Advance care planning (ACP) is the process of making plans and decisions regarding end-of-life care (EOLC) in advance while one has the physical and cognitive capacity to do so. However, even if health practitioners recognize the importance of ACP, they may be constrained by social and cultural factors in engaging their clients in ACP. This study examined cultural differences in ACP and various strategies that social workers use to initiate conversations on ACP in a range of settings. Using the case study method, we conducted in-depth interviews with 7 social workers who work in South Korea, 2 Korean-American social workers working in the Korean-American communities in the US, and 3 American social workers serving diverse populations in the US. Their practice sites include: university hospitals, day care centers, a community senior center, a nursing home, and a hospice agency. Social workers in both countries emphasized the need to build rapport with their clients early on and to empower them to take the lead in their ACP while they were still healthy. In Korean and Korean-American communities, social workers recognized their clients’ reluctance to speak about EOLC and highlighted the importance of communicating with their family due to their clients’ preference for family-centered decision-making. When doing this, a step-by-step approach in giving relevant information was recommended. We identified relationship-building, empowerment, and culturally sensitive approaches as common strategies in initiating discussions on ACP in both countries.
Across race, ethnicity, and language: An intervention to improve advance care planning documentation unmasks health disparities

Priyanka A Dutta,Sarah J Flynn,Sandra Oreper,Molly A Kantor,Michelle Mourad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13248

Abstract:Background: Racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to have advance directives and living wills, despite the importance of advanced care planning (ACP) in end-of-life care. We aimed to understand the impact of an intervention to improve ACP documentation across race, ethnicity, and language on hospitalized patients at our institution. Methods: We launched an intervention to improve the rates of ACP documentation for hospitalized patients aged >75 or with advanced illness defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. We analyzed ACP completion rates, preintervention, and intervention, and used interrupted time-series analyses to measure the differential impact of the intervention across race, ethnicity, and language. Key results: A total of 10,220 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall rates of ACP documentation improved from 13.9% to 43.7% in the intervention period, with a 2.47% monthly increase in ACP documentation compared to baseline (p < .001). During the intervention period, the rate of ACP documentation increased by 2.72% per month for non-Hispanic White patients (p < .001), by 1.84% per month for Latinx patients (p < .001), and by 1.9% per month for Black patients (p < .001). Differences in the intervention trends between non-Hispanic White and Latinx patients (p = .04) and Black patients (p = .04) were significant. Conclusions: An intervention designed to improve ACP documentation in hospitalized patients widened a disparity across race and ethnicity with Latinx and Black patients having lower rates of improvement. Our findings reinforce the need to measure the impact of quality improvement interventions on existing health disparities and to implement specific strategies to prevent worsening disparities.
What makes advance care planning discussion so difficult? A systematic review of the factors of advance care planning in healthcare settings

Margaret Hay Ping Suen,Amy Yin Man Chow,Raymond Kam Wing Woo,Sze Kit Yuen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951524000464

2024-05-21

Palliative & Supportive Care

Abstract:Objectives Existing systematic reviews related to advance care planning (ACP) largely focus on specific groups and intervention efficacy or are limited to contextual factors. This research aims to identify the modifiable factors perceived by different users of ACP in healthcare settings and inform healthcare professionals about the factors affecting ACP practice. Methods Five English-language databases (ProQuest, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Medline) and two Chinese-language databases (CNKI and NCL) were searched up to November 2022. Empirical research identifying factors related to ACP in healthcare settings was included. ACP is defined as a discussion process on future end-of-life care. Thematic synthesis was performed on all included studies. Results A total of 1871 unique articles were screened; the full texts of 193 were assessed by 4 reviewers, and 45 articles were included for analysis. Twenty-two (54%) studies were qualitative, 15 (33%) were quantitative, and 6 (13%) used mixed methods. Foci varied from 28 (62%) studies on a single subject group (either patient, family, or physician), 11 (25%) on 2 subject groups (either patient and family or patient and healthcare professional), and 6 (13%) covered 3 subject groups (patient, family, and healthcare professional). Among the 17 studies involving more than 1 subject group, only 2 adopted a dyadic lens in analysis. Complex interwoven factors were categorized into (1) intrapersonal factors, (2) interpersonal factors, and (3) socio-environmental factors, with a total of 11 themes: personal belief, emotions, the burden on others, timing, responsiveness, relationship, family dynamics, experience, person taking the lead, culture, and support. Significance of results Patients, families, and healthcare professionals are the essential stakeholders of ACP in healthcare settings. Factors are interweaved among the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and socio-environmental dimensions. Research is warranted to examine the dynamic interactions of the 3 essential stakeholders from a multidimensional perspective, and the mechanism of the interweaving of factors.

health policy & services
Improve Advance Care Planning: A Brief Report Discussing Goals of Care Interventions to Improve Communication Among Health Care Teams and Patients Maximizing the Use of the Electronic Health Record Tools

Patty Horecki,James Deming,Meg Lagunas,Rebecca Brustad,Scott Okuno,James Manz,Sue Christensen,Zoha Suhail

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2023.0580

2024-02-17

Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract:Introduction: A key element of advance care planning (ACP) is the goals of care (GOC) conversation between the provider and the patient. The value of meaningful GOC conversations for the patient, provider, and health care institution is well documented. However, if the GOC documentation is buried in the medical record, not well defined, or poorly documented, that value is squandered. The Improvement Process: Interventions were implemented with oncology physicians and nurse practitioners (NPs). These included education, system reform including improving the ease and consistency of documentation of ACP, and regular feedback. Results: Participants reported increased confidence in communication skills about GOC conversations postworkshops. Data results for the tracked metrics, health care power of attorney, code status, and GOC, all showed improvement. Conclusion: Physicians and NPs recognized the importance of GOC conversations as part of ACP. Considerable progress was made by focusing on GOC conversations, maximizing information technology, participating in coaching, and ongoing data monitoring.

health care sciences & services
Advance Care Planning With Black Women with Breast Cancer: A Community Health Worker Model

Marcia M. Tan,Dario M. Villamar,Clarissa Huard,Lian Nicholson,Heidy N. Medina,Patricia I. Moreno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748231162479

2023-03-14

Cancer Control

Abstract:Background Despite the importance of advance care planning (ACP), a process that optimizes future medical treatment and end-of-life care, for at-risk populations, rates of patient-provider ACP conversations are extremely low among Black women with breast cancer. Community health workers (CHWs) are well-positioned to support patients in engaging in ACP conversations with their providers; yet research on integrating CHWs to promote ACP is scant. The current study examined multilevel facilitators and barriers to successful ACP conversations among Black women from the perspective of providers and CHWs who serve this community. Methods Providers and CHWs were recruited from an academic medical center in a large urban city. Retrospective qualitative data on barriers and facilitators to ACP conversations, as well as CHWs' training needs, were collected from two focus groups (N = 5 providers, N = 5 CHWs) and one individual interview (N = 1 provider), and transcribed and coded for themes. Results All providers reported working primarily with Black patients, and identified stigma and time constraints as major barriers to ACP discussions; they also identified the structural barriers and injustices that their patients face during medical care. CHWs reported having a trusted relationship with their patients and flexibility in their care that would allow for ongoing ACP conversations, discussing their ability to serve as a bridge between the patient and provider. However, CHWs discussed that they lacked the tools and skills to have ACP conversations, largely because existing formal trainings in ACP are cost prohibitive. Discussion Competing priorities of the provider to discuss/treat the patient’s disease and medical mistrust were major barriers to successful ACP conversations among Black women with breast cancer, leading to ACP completion occurring late in treatment. CHWs are uniquely qualified to overcome multilevel barriers to ACP and establish trusting relationships with patients in order to facilitate earlier and ongoing communication between patients and providers.

oncology
[Radioimmunologic method of analyzing testosterone using an I-125-labeled derivative].

R. Stupnicki,K. Romanowicz,E. Kula,T. Przewloka

Endokrynologia Polska

Abstract:
"Why wouldn't we want to do this?" The challenge for oncology hospital nurses to engage in serious illness conversation and advance care planning

Yi-An Shih,Cheng Wang,Ran Zhang,Qian Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.07.030

IF: 2.525

2024-08-19

Geriatric Nursing

Abstract:Background The viability of advance care planning (ACP) in cultures where discussing future desires is taboo is unclear, it is essential to examine the challenges faced by Chinese nurses lacking legal protection for ACP. Aims To comprehend Chinese oncology nurses' perceptions of serious illness conversation and ACP, and identify barriers to engagement. Methods A qualitative descriptive exploratory study involving semi-structured interviews with 13 experienced oncology nurses, analyzed using thematic analysis and critical incident technique, following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Findings Four themes emerged: Inadequate Competence Causes Patient Harm, Cultural Influences to Patient Autonomy, Psychological Tolerance Neglects Best Interests, and Systemic and Legal Uncertainties Impact Patient Rights. Conclusion Policy changes supporting nurses in ACP implementation, a 'whole-system strategic approach' involving legislative changes, organizational support, and public awareness are crucial for optimizing ACP and meeting diverse patient needs.

nursing,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Improving End-of-Life Care for Diverse Populations: Communication, Competency, and System Supports

Sara G. McCleskey,Cindy L. Cain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909119827933

2019-02-06

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®

Abstract:Background: While disparities in end-of-life care have been well-documented, explanations for the persistence of disparities are less clear. This study sought to examine diverse perceptions of end-of-life care, especially regarding how medical professionals can better serve all populations. Objective: To investigate similarities and differences in end-of-life care preferences, across racial and ethnic groups. Design: This work consists of a qualitative study utilizing in-depth focus group discussions. Setting/Participants: Six community-based focus groups were conducted with a total of 39 participants. Two groups were composed of African American participants, 2 had Latino participants, and 2 groups had white participants. Results: Analysis produced 3 major themes: (1) clear, comprehensive, and culturally relevant provider–patient communication regarding serious illness; (2) provider characteristics and competency; and (3) health system supports and barriers. Although all groups had individuals who expressed a strong preference for direct communication, individuals varied within groups. All groups discussed concerns that the costs of care are high and that financial considerations are given more importance than high-quality care. Groups diverged in their focus on provider characteristics and feelings of marginalization. African American and Latino groups emphasized a desire to match characteristics with providers, and African American groups discussed that their marginalization in the health-care system requires hypervigilance to receive high-quality care. Conclusions: Improvements in care would come from acknowledging diversity within groups, provider demonstration of comfort and competence, more effective care coordination, and recruitment of providers who share similar characteristics with the communities they serve.
Cross-cultural similarities and differences in attitudes about advance care planning

Henry S. Perkins,Cynthia M. A. Geppert,Adelita Gonzales,Josie D. Cortez,Helen P. Hazuda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.01032.x

IF: 5.7

2002-01-01

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Culture may have an important impact on a patient's decision whether to perform advance care planning. But the cultural attitudes influencing such decisions are poorly defined. This hypothesis-generating study begins to characterize those attitudes in 3 American ethnic cultures.DESIGN: Structured, open-ended interviews with blinded content analysis.SETTING: Two general medicine wards in San Antonio, Texas.PATIENTS: Purposive sampling of 26 Mexican-American, 18 Euro-American, and 14 African-American inpatients.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 3 groups shared some views, potentially reflecting elements of an American core culture. For example, majorities of all groups believed "the patient deserves a say in treatment," and "advance directives (ADs) improve the chances a patient's wishes will be followed." But the groups differed on other themes, likely reflecting specific ethnic cultures. For example, most Mexican Americans believed "the health system controls treatment," trusted the system "to serve patients well," believed ADs "help staff know or implement a patient's wishes," and wanted "to die when treatment is futile." Few Euro Americans believed "the system controls treatment," but most trusted the system "to serve patients well," had particular wishes about life support, other care, and acceptable outcomes, and believed ADs "help staff know or implement a patient's wishes." Most African Americans believed "the health system controls treatment," few trusted the system "to serve patients well," and most believed they should "wait until very sick to express treatment wishes."CONCLUSION: While grounded in values that may compose part of American core culture, advance care planning may need tailoring to a patient's specific ethnic views.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
Barriers to Advance Care Planning at the End of Life: An Explanatory Systematic Review of Implementation Studies

Susi Lund,Alison Richardson,Carl May

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116629

IF: 3.7

2015-02-13

PLoS ONE

Abstract:CONTEXT: Advance Care Plans (ACPs) enable patients to discuss and negotiate their preferences for the future including treatment options at the end of life. Their implementation poses significant challenges.OBJECTIVE: To investigate barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ACPs, focusing on their workability and integration in clinical practice.DESIGN: An explanatory systematic review of qualitative implementation studies.DATA SOURCES: Empirical studies that reported interventions designed to support ACP in healthcare. Web of Knowledge, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index and PubMed databases were searched.METHODS: Direct content analysis, using Normalization Process Theory, to identify and characterise relevant components of implementation processes.RESULTS: 13 papers identified from 166 abstracts were included in the review. Key factors facilitating implementation were: specially prepared staff utilizing a structured approach to interactions around ACPs. Barriers to implementation were competing demands of other work, the emotional and interactional nature of patient-professional interactions around ACPs, problems in sharing decisions and preferences within and between healthcare organizations.CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that doing more of the things that facilitate delivery of ACPs will not reduce the effects of those things that undermine them. Structured tools are only likely to be partially effective and the creation of a specialist cadre of ACP facilitators is unlikely to be a sustainable solution. The findings underscore both the challenge and need to find ways to routinely incorporate ACPs in clinical settings where multiple and competing demands impact on practice. Interventions most likely to meet with success are those that make elements of Advance Care Planning workable within complex and time pressured clinical workflows.

multidisciplinary sciences
Past Disparities in Advance Care Planning Across Sociodemographic Characteristics and Cognition Levels in the United States

Zahra Rahemi,Juanita-Dawne R. Bacsu,Sophia Z. Shalhout,Morteza Sabet,Delaram Sirizi,Matthew Lee Smith,Swann Arp Adams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.09.24307125

2024-05-10

Abstract:We aimed to examine past advance care planning (ACP) in U.S. older adults across different sociodemographic characteristics and cognition levels. We established the baseline trends from 10 years ago to assess if trends in 2024 have improved upon future data availability. We considered two legal documents in the Health and Retirement Study 2014 survey as measures for ACP: a living will and durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOAH). Logistic regression models were fitted with outcome variables (living will, DPOAH, and both) stratified by cognition levels (dementia/impaired cognition versus normal cognition). Predictor variables included age, gender, ethnicity, race, education, marital status, rurality, everyday discrimination, social support, and loneliness. Age, ethnicity, race, education, and rurality were significant predictors of ACP (having a living will, DPOAH, and both the living will and DPOAH) across cognition levels. Participants who were younger, Hispanic, Black, had lower levels of education, or resided in rural areas were less likely to complete ACP. Examining ACP and its linkages to specific social determinants is essential to understanding disparities and educational strategies needed to facilitate ACP uptake among different population groups. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine past ACP disparities in relation to specific social determinants of health and different cognition levels. Future studies are required to evaluate whether existing disparities have improved over the last 10 years when 2024 data is released. Addressing ACP disparities among diverse populations, including racial and ethnic minorities with reduced cognition levels, is crucial for enhancing health equity and access to care.

Health Systems and Quality Improvement

Design Considerations for Building a Scalable Digital Version of a Multi-player Educational Board Game for a MOOC in Logistics and Transportation

Advance care planning as perceived by marginalized populations: Willing to engage and facing obstacles

ACP Conversations with Chinese and South Asian Patients: Physicians’ Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitating Factors

Achieving goal‐concordant care: Formal and informal advance care planning for White, Black, and Hispanic older adults

The Effect of Pelargonium endlicherianum Fenzl. root extracts on formation of nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activities.

What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review

Home Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients at Risk for Becoming Incapacitated With No Evident Advance Directives or Surrogates

Indole hydrazides as potential monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Community Health Care Workers Empowering Advance Care Planning

Internal Medicine Resident Barriers to Advance Care Planning in the Primary Care Continuity Clinic

Culture Differences in Advance Care Planning and Implications for Social Work Practice

Across race, ethnicity, and language: An intervention to improve advance care planning documentation unmasks health disparities

What makes advance care planning discussion so difficult? A systematic review of the factors of advance care planning in healthcare settings

Improve Advance Care Planning: A Brief Report Discussing Goals of Care Interventions to Improve Communication Among Health Care Teams and Patients Maximizing the Use of the Electronic Health Record Tools

Advance Care Planning With Black Women with Breast Cancer: A Community Health Worker Model

[Radioimmunologic method of analyzing testosterone using an I-125-labeled derivative].

"Why wouldn't we want to do this?" The challenge for oncology hospital nurses to engage in serious illness conversation and advance care planning

Improving End-of-Life Care for Diverse Populations: Communication, Competency, and System Supports

Cross-cultural similarities and differences in attitudes about advance care planning

Barriers to Advance Care Planning at the End of Life: An Explanatory Systematic Review of Implementation Studies

Past Disparities in Advance Care Planning Across Sociodemographic Characteristics and Cognition Levels in the United States