Abstract:Exploring the conditions under which cooperation can emerge in populations has long been a subject for humans. Fair preference psychology has been incorporated into the analytical framework of the public goods game. Based on considering the dynamic update of trust-driven investment willingness, we introduce a dynamic payoff allocation mechanism and loners to traditional PGG, explaining how the mechanism related to fairness preferences promotes cooperation. We assume that payoffs are equally allocated among players when the payoffs do not exceed the threshold. Otherwise, the excess portion is proportionally allocated according to the investment willingness of cooperators. The effects of parameter changes on the evolution of cooperation are investigated by conducting Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that introducing dynamic payoff allocation and loners can effectively promote cooperation in a specific range of parameters. Specifically, the existence of loners is a double-edged sword. Loners can prevent players from adopting defection behaviors on a large scale when the payoff of cooperation is unsatisfied and inhibit the emergence and diffusion of cooperative strategies as the payoff of cooperators increases. When the payoff of cooperation is dissatisfactory, the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism can promote the average investment willingness of cooperators to accelerate the spread of cooperation. However, the payoff reallocation coefficient should not be set too high, and a high-level threshold of payoff reallocation may lead to the failure of the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism. There is an optimal payoff reallocation coefficient to maximize the efficiency of the proposed mechanism. Moreover, the optimal payoff reallocation coefficient that can maximize the cooperation level is distinct for the diverse combination of enhancement factor and loss aversion coefficient. However, its value should be set at a low level in general. These results may help researchers better understand the evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation from a fairness preference perspective.

Competition for talent: heterogenous abilities in team production

The Team Allocator Game: Allocation Power in Public Goods Games

Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games

Self‐love, growth, and competition in a public good game

Prize-allocation rules in generalized team contests

Inequality and the allocation of collective goods

Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games

Equality, equity and incentives: An experiment

Equality and efficiency shape cooperation in multiple-public-goods provision problems.

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Inequal dependence on members stabilizes cooperation in spatial public goods game

Heterogeneous productivity stabilizes public good contributions under certainty, uncertainty and ambiguity

Heterogeneous contributions can jeopardize cooperation in the Public Goods Game

Are teams conditionally cooperative? Experimental evidence from a public goods game

Tournaments, Contestant Heterogeneity and Performance

Team Production, Collective Reputation and Sharing Rule

Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games

The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on contributions in best-shot public good games

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation: A fairness preference perspective

Team Signaling and Collective Reputation with an Application to the Optimal Sharing Rule