Abstract:Exploring the conditions under which cooperation can emerge in populations has long been a subject for humans. Fair preference psychology has been incorporated into the analytical framework of the public goods game. Based on considering the dynamic update of trust-driven investment willingness, we introduce a dynamic payoff allocation mechanism and loners to traditional PGG, explaining how the mechanism related to fairness preferences promotes cooperation. We assume that payoffs are equally allocated among players when the payoffs do not exceed the threshold. Otherwise, the excess portion is proportionally allocated according to the investment willingness of cooperators. The effects of parameter changes on the evolution of cooperation are investigated by conducting Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that introducing dynamic payoff allocation and loners can effectively promote cooperation in a specific range of parameters. Specifically, the existence of loners is a double-edged sword. Loners can prevent players from adopting defection behaviors on a large scale when the payoff of cooperation is unsatisfied and inhibit the emergence and diffusion of cooperative strategies as the payoff of cooperators increases. When the payoff of cooperation is dissatisfactory, the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism can promote the average investment willingness of cooperators to accelerate the spread of cooperation. However, the payoff reallocation coefficient should not be set too high, and a high-level threshold of payoff reallocation may lead to the failure of the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism. There is an optimal payoff reallocation coefficient to maximize the efficiency of the proposed mechanism. Moreover, the optimal payoff reallocation coefficient that can maximize the cooperation level is distinct for the diverse combination of enhancement factor and loss aversion coefficient. However, its value should be set at a low level in general. These results may help researchers better understand the evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation from a fairness preference perspective.

Team Production, Collective Reputation and Sharing Rule

Team Signaling and Collective Reputation with an Application to the Optimal Sharing Rule

Pareto Optimal Sharing Rules Belancing Budget

Competition for talent: heterogenous abilities in team production

Reputation-based synergy and discounting mechanism promotes cooperation

Dynamics of Profit-Sharing Games

Solving the collective-risk social dilemma with risky assets in well-mixed and structured populations

The Team Allocator Game: Allocation Power in Public Goods Games

Evolution of cooperation with joint liability

Resolving social dilemmas with minimal reward transfer

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation: A fairness preference perspective

Strategic formation of collaborative networks

The regulation of good and evi promotes cooperation in public goods game

Effects of morality and reputation on sharing behaviors in human-robot teams

Cooperative Emergence of Spatial Public Goods Games with Reputation Discount Accumulation

Reputation and the Realization of Collective Actions in the Chinese Relation-based Society

Optimizing Contracts in Principal-Agent Team Production

Cooperation Enforcement and Collusion Resistance in Repeated Public Goods Games

The evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games under a risk-transfer mechanism