Abstract:We consider the fundamental problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among strategic agents with additive valuation functions. It is well known that, in the absence of monetary transfers, Pareto efficient and truthful rules are dictatorial, while there is no deterministic truthful mechanism that allocates all items and achieves envy-freeness up to one item (EF1), even for the case of two agents. In this paper, we investigate the interplay of fairness and efficiency under a relaxation of truthfulness called non-obvious manipulability (NOM), recently proposed by Troyan and Morrill. We show that this relaxation allows us to bypass the aforementioned negative results in a very strong sense. Specifically, we prove that there are deterministic and EF1 algorithms that are not obviously manipulable, and the algorithm that maximizes utilitarian social welfare (the sum of agents' utilities), which is Pareto efficient but not dictatorial, is not obviously manipulable for $n \geq 3$ agents (but obviously manipulable for $n=2$ agents). At the same time, maximizing the egalitarian social welfare (the minimum of agents' utilities) or the Nash social welfare (the product of agents' utilities) is obviously manipulable for any number of agents and items. Our main result is an approximation preserving black-box reduction from the problem of designing EF1 and NOM mechanisms to the problem of designing EF1 algorithms. En route, we prove an interesting structural result about EF1 allocations, as well as new "best-of-both-worlds" results (for the problem without incentives), that might be of independent interest.

Pareto Optimal Sharing Rules Belancing Budget

Best Cost-Sharing Rule Design for Selfish Bin Packing

Team Production, Collective Reputation and Sharing Rule

A Best Cost-Sharing Rule for Selfish Bin Packing

From Packing Rules to Cost-Sharing Mechanisms.

Optimal sharing, equilibria, and welfare without risk aversion

Competitive Equilibria with Unequal Budgets: Supporting Arbitrary Pareto Optimal Allocations

Optimal Budget Aggregation with Star-Shaped Preferences

Team Signaling and Collective Reputation with an Application to the Optimal Sharing Rule

The Balancing Act: the Optimal Assignment of New Players in Sports Leagues

RISK-SHARING MATCHING AND MORAL HAZARD

Sharing Non-anonymous Costs of Multiple Resources Optimally

Optimal Sharing Rule for a Household with a Portfolio Management Problem

Optimizing Contracts in Principal-Agent Team Production

On Improving Resource Allocations by Sharing

A fixed point approach for computing actuarially fair Pareto optimal risk-sharing rules

Optimal risk sharing under distorted probabilities

Optimal Risk Allocation in Alliance Infrastructure Projects:A Social Preference Perspective

Fair and Efficient Allocations Without Obvious Manipulations

Sharing a Reward Based on Peer Evaluations

The Price of Fairness with the Extended Perles–Maschler Solution