Abstract:Using public goods games in a laboratory setting, we study team-level production, where two teams compete for the resources of a common-member who can benefit from and provide effort in both teams. Intrinsically, the common-member faces divided loyalties. We examine such competition in a setting in which the common-member has productive abilities equal to that of the other team members (dedicated-members), and in two settings where he/she has greater relative potential. When effort (contributions) by the common-member have greater productivity (coupled with higher opportunity costs to contribute) in providing the public good relative to that of dedicated-members, we find team performance is not significantly increased. On the other hand, when the common-member has a greater endowment, sufficient to match the absolute contributions of team members in both teams, there is a significant increase in team performance. The evidence suggests that a norm of reciprocity by dedicated-members based on absolute contributions of the common-member better explains behavior than a norm based on the value added of the common-member's contributions. This behavior, along with fairness norms elicited in a survey, suggests that on average dedicated members do not sufficiently incorporate the common-members' higher opportunity costs in the treatment where his/her productivity is increased. This setting provides an important illustration of where the behavioral response to the type of inequality matters, leading to differences in team efficiency.

Heterogeneous productivity stabilizes public good contributions under certainty, uncertainty and ambiguity

Heterogeneous contributions can jeopardize cooperation in the Public Goods Game

Analysis of a Dynamic Voluntary Contribution Mechanism Public Good Game

Competition for talent: heterogenous abilities in team production

Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games

Contingent Reasoning and Dynamic Public Goods Provision

Heterogeneous Investment with Dynamical Feedback Promotes Public Cooperation and Group Success in Spatial Public Goods Games

Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games

Game of Variable Contributions to the Common Good under Uncertainty

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Heterogeneity in Social Preference,Individual Rationality and Contribution Cooperation：A Study Based on a VCM Experiment

Cooperation and confusion in public goods games: confusion cannot explain contribution patterns

Private provision of public goods under price uncertainty: a comment

Continuous-Time Public Good Contribution under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Control Approach

The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on contributions in best-shot public good games

The Effect of Subgroup Homogeneity of Efficacy on Contribution in Public Good Dilemmas

Cooperation in public goods experiments with random and finite stopping rules

Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games

Beyond a binary theorizing of prosociality

Position uncertainty in a sequential public goods game: an experiment

Self‐love, growth, and competition in a public good game