Abstract:The integrated development of urban and rural areas requires that the government take responsibility for the overall development of the countryside. Chinese agricultural and rural policies characterized by state intervention and government leadership have played an important role in promoting agricultural development and increasing farmers' incomes as well as balancing development in urban and rural areas. However, the effectiveness of current agricultural policies in promoting agricultural productivity is now clearly leveling off. Given this situation, the authors argue that it is imperative to construct a new analytical framework featuring government regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development. In this framework, the government must clearly define the boundaries between its activities and those of the market and rural social organizations. While fully respecting the fundamental role of the market in allocation of resources and rural self-management, the government should exercise its power as a backstop. Further, the government needs to establish a logical sequence for government functions such as formulating the basic operating system of the market and society, correcting market failure and social dysfunction and cultivating market/social entities. To use this new analytical framework to strengthen and improve its regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development, the government needs to reform the basic rural management and agricultural support and protection systems and to pay attention to the cultivation of market entities in agricultural production on the basis of agricultural marketization. Furthermore, it needs to construct a basic urban-rural integrated public service system with the government as the leading actor, carry out innovations in the management system of rural society and fully mobilize the social forces to take part in the administration of public affairs. It also needs to reconstruct the system of government administration and management to ensure the thorough implementation of agricultural and rural development policies.

The Supply of Rural Public Utility and the Construction a New Comprehensive Well-off Society in Rural Areas

STUDY ON THE CONSISTENCY OF THE RURAL PUBLIC GOODS CONSTRUCTION——Based on Empirical Study on Survey Data of "ten Counties and A Hundred Villages"

Research on Power Supply Service under New Urbanization and Beautiful Countriside Construction

Study on the Public Goods Supply of Gap Between City and Village and Orchestration Reform

Measures of Optimizing the Rural Public Service Supply Mechanism

Research on the Water Supply Construction in Rural Areas

A Study on the Construction of New Socialist Countryside that Focuses on Raising Rural Residents' Quality of Life:Based on the Survey of 1 029 Rural Residents

On Diversified Suppliers of Rural Public Goods——Based on Polycentric Governance Theory

Diverging Water from Countryside to Urban Use and Its Impact on Rural Development——A Case Study of Zhuanzhougou Village, Xinglong County, Hebei Province in China

The Relationship Between Government on One Side and the Market and Society on the Other in China's Agricultural and Rural Development: an Analytical Framework

On Rural Comprehensive Well-off and Agriculture Industrialization

DEVELOPMENTAL STRATEGY OF RURAL ENERGY IN BUILDING A WELL-OFF SOCIETY

Toward a Sustainable Rural Governance? the Public Goods Provision in Question Amidst the State-led Rural Construction in China

Multi-objective Water Supply of Irrigation Districts and Agricultural Water Shortage——A Theoretic Model and Implications for Policies

Why is Public Goods Underprovided in Rural China?

Rural Public Service System and Environmental Development in Rural Areas

The Construction of Comprehensive Well-off Society for the Establishment of Sustainable development of Societism

Research on the Collaborative Mechanism of Rural Public Service Supply

Some Problems Concerning Rural Construction in Suzhou

Research on Digital Rural Construction and Public Service Supply: Taking the Anhui, Zhejiang and Jiangsu as an Example

Rural Public Investment and Benefit in Sichuan's Hilly and Mountainous Areas.