The health, climate, and equity benefits of freight truck electrification in the United States

Eleanor M Hennessy,Corinne D Scown,Inês M L Azevedo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad75a9
IF: 6.7
2024-09-21
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:Long-haul freight shipment in the United States relies on diesel trucks and constitutes ∼3% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and a significant share of local air pollution. Here, we compare the climate and air pollution-related health damages from electric versus diesel long-haul truck fleets. We use truck commodity flows to estimate tailpipe emissions from diesel trucks and regional grid emissions intensities to estimate charging emissions from electric trucks under various grid scenarios. We use a reduced complexity air quality model combined with valuation of air pollution-related premature deaths (using two hazard ratios (HRs)) and quantify the distributional health impacts in different scenarios. We find that annual health and climate costs of the current diesel fleet are 249/capita compared to 205/capita for a new diesel fleet, and 177/capita for an electric fleet, depending on the HR. We find that freight electrification could avoid 32.3–39.2 billion in avoided damages annually and health benefits throughout the U.S. Electrifying transport of consumer manufacturing goods (including electronics, transport equipment, and precision instruments) and food, beverage, and tobacco products would provide the largest absolute health and climate benefits, whereas mixed freight and manufacturing goods would result in the largest benefits per tonne-km. We find small variations in health damages across race and income. These results will help policymakers prioritize electrification and charging investment strategies for the freight transportation sub-sector.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?