Abstract:In a series of papers Holmstrom, Milgrom and Roberts have argued that incentives for agents tend to be complementary under certain conditions. A growing body of empirical literature also appears to support this notion. Data constraints, however, have limited the studies to some particular industries or to a selective few aspects in agency contracts. This paper examines the complementarity and substitutability of CEO incentives of more than 300 Chinese state-owned enterprises from a panel data set. The data contain rich information about CEO pay sensitivity; whether the CEO posted performance bond; managerial discretion in production, in employee wage discretion, share of output to sell to the market (versus being required to deliver to the state at lower price); and contract duration. In explaining the interaction of incentives, we extend the framework of Holmstrom and Milgrom (1994) to accommodate the case of multiple signals for the manager's effort for each task. We classify the various incentive instruments into three tasks of CEOs: to pursue current financial performance, to invest for future financial performance, and to work on other activities that yield private benefits. The model then suggests that these three incentive indices should be complementary, and the individual incentives within an incentive index should be substitutes. Our empirical examination confirms these predictions. A side product of getting the conditional correlations is to be able to examine the determinants of the three incentive indices. We find that the determination of CEO incentives for current performance is consistent with the risk-incentive tradeoff hypothesis. The determination of managerial discretion is consistent with the incomplete contract literature that control rights should be matched with the party with superior information and ability. There is also evidence that the government uses contract duration to elicit information.

Does unfairness reduce efficiency? Within-industry CEO pay inequity and firm efficiency in China

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Pay Disparity In Multinational And Domestic Firms In China: The Role Of Pro-Disparity Norm

Could Executive Compensation Incentive Enhance the Efficiency of Enterprise Resource Allocation? An Empirical Study from China

The Impact of the CEO Pay Ratio on Firm Value

Top executive pay and firm performance in China

Incentive Pay and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China

The effect of CEO's compensation in driving corporate ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China

Troubled by unequal pay rather than low pay: The incentive effects of a top management team pay gap

Not all stakeholders are created equal: executive vertical pay disparity and firms’ choice of internal and external CSR

The implications of inefficient markets for executive pay comparison: The case of China and Poland

Do Executive Equity Incentives Improve the Efficiency of Corporate Investment? ‐‐ An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Listed Companies

CEO Pay Cuts and Investors’ Perceptions of Earnings Quality

Incentives to Move Up the Echelon: Impact of Inter-hierarchical Pay Gaps on Employee Performance

Do all CEO pay regulations hurt firm performance? Evidence from China

On the Director Compensation, CEO Compensation and Firm's Performance

Complementarity and Substitutability of CEO Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Within-Firm Income Inequality: Evidence from China

Pay disparities within top management teams, marketization and firms’ innovation: evidence from China

Do equity incentives for the managements have impact on stock-pricing efficiency? Evidence from China

The Dark Side of the Chinese Stock Market: Managerial Rent-Seeking Through Equity Incentives